The Jerusalem Post, on Iran, 9 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Iran defends two-day peace proposal as 'most reasonable,' slamming Rubio's remarks as unjustified

Findings are available in the analysis below.1 finding

Iran defended a proposal on Monday to restart peace talks in as few as two days as the most reasonable offer on the table, after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio called some of Iran's conditions "outrageous and ridiculous.""Is it unreasonable that Iran demands that US illegal sanctions and its naval blockade must be lifted before negotiations start and that the war should end on all fronts?" Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei told a weekly press conference in response to Rubio's remarks.Iran has made the offer to shorten the time to restart talks from an earlier seven-day proposal, which calls for Washington to first meet conditions including halting hostilities, lifting a blockade and waiving sanctions.Baghaei also said US pressure on Iraq to close most of its borders with Iran should not affect bilateral ties with Baghdad, after Iraq's foreign minister said Washington was pushing for such a move.Baghaei dismissed a US military task force aimed at restricting Iran's land trade as a diversion following President Donald Trump's Republicans' losses in midterm elections.Trump administration favors diplomatic solution, Iran strikes on the tableSpeaking to reporters ahead of his departure for France to attend a meeting of G7 foreign ministers, Rubio said, "I have no progress to report.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article quotes Baghaei's questions about sanctions and the blockade but drops his charge, made at the same press conference, that the US attacked Iran in the middle of negotiations. Without it a reader believes Iran's objection concerns only preconditions, not US military action during talks.

How we know

There are several countries that continue to engage with Iran and put forward various ideas, but I would not say that we are on the verge of a breakthrough."Rubio said US President Donald Trump continues to favor a diplomatic solution, but acknowledged that Iranian demands remain a major obstacle to reaching an agreement.Rubio also addressed the possibility of additional US strikes on Iran, saying Washington would act if American forces or shipping in the region came under threat.Idan Kweller contributed to this report.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Jerusalem Post runs a Reuters report that quotes Iran's foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei on sanctions and the blockade. It leaves out his charge, made at the same press conference and reported by Antiwar.com, that the US attacked Iran in the middle of negotiations. The gap is minor, because the article already quotes his call for the war to end on all fronts and mentions possible additional US strikes on Iran.

  1. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article quotes Baghaei's questions about sanctions and the blockade but drops his charge, made at the same press conference, that the US attacked Iran in the middle of negotiations. Without it a reader believes Iran's objection concerns only preconditions, not US military action during talks.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 9 NovTrump to meet Qatar's prime minister as Iran diplomacy faces hurdles3.0
  2. 9 Nov'Iranian demands are outrageous,' Rubio says as talks fail to make progress3.0
  3. 8 NovThe US wants to cut off Iran’s access to weapons via its land borders, will this work? - analysis3.0
  4. 8 NovIran-backed Iraqi militias may lash out amid increased pressure from US - analysis3.0
  5. 8 NovIran-linked ships suspected of mapping, placing mines around undersea telecommunications cables6.0

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post