Reuters, on Gaza, 19 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Israel to resume commercial shipments to Gaza after Hamas fee dispute

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Palestinians walk through a street market in Gaza City, October 16, 2026. REUTERS/Dawoud Abu Alkas Purchase Licensing Rights , opens new tab CAIRO, Oct 19 (Reuters) - Israel said on Monday it would resume allowing commercial goods shipments into Gaza after a days-long halt over ​involving Hamas and merchants, restoring a key route for food and ‌other essentials to the aid-dependent enclave. COGAT, the Israeli military agency overseeing humanitarian affairs in Gaza, said it made the decision after merchants reported that Hamas authorities had withdrawn ​demands for payments of 10,000 shekels ($3,225) per truck.

Sign up here. "The resumption of coordination ​is being carried out in accordance with Israel's commitment to ⁠the humanitarian provisions of the ceasefire agreement," it said. COGAT said the merchants' ​accounts had not been independently verified and shipments would resume gradually, with ​priority given to essential goods ahead of winter. Oversight would be tightened to ensure payments are made and received only through documented bank transfers, with any merchant found to ​have paid Hamas facing exclusion from the system.

Hamas said the 10,000-shekel fee ​was a voluntary contribution by better-off Gazans to a national fund supporting people in ‌need ⁠in the war-ravaged territory. Most Gazans remain dependent on aid after three years of war, repeated displacement and , opens new tab . While last year's US-brokered ceasefire halted the heaviest fighting, it has not ended Israeli attacks. Local health ​officials said on ​Monday that at ⁠least five Palestinians, including a 14-year-old boy, were killed in separate Israeli strikes in Gaza City and Khan Younis. ​The Israeli military did not immediately comment.

Israel says Hamas ​has continued ⁠to rearm and carry out attacks in violation of the ceasefire, while Hamas accuses Israel of undermining the agreement. Gaza health officials say about 1,500 Palestinians ⁠have been ​killed by Israeli fire since the October ​2025 ceasefire, while Israel says four of its soldiers have been killed by militants in ​Gaza over the same period. ($1 = 3.0991 shekels) Reporting by Nidal al-Mughrabi Editing by Ros Russell Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. , opens new tab Suggested Topics: Middle East Human Rights X Facebook Linkedin Email Link Purchase Licensing Rights

Read the original article on reuters.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Reuters reports that Israel will resume commercial shipments into Gaza after it halted them over a payment dispute. Reuters attributes COGAT's account and Hamas's account to each of them. It names Israeli strikes as the cause of new deaths. It handles the casualty figures from each side in the same way. Reuters makes two small slips. It gives the aid restrictions with no actor, so the reader never learns who imposes them. It also calls the payments a tax in its own voice.

  1. Hides who did it

    Minor

    “severe restrictions on aid deliveries”

    Why this matters
    The phrase "severe restrictions on aid deliveries" names the restrictions but not who imposes them.
    The impression it gives
    A reader could take the restrictions as a general condition of the territory rather than a policy of a named party.
    The context
    The article's own opening shows Israel decides what enters Gaza: it halted the shipments and is now allowing them again. The restrictions are Israel's.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Israel said on Monday it would resume allowing commercial goods shipments into Gaza”

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “a tax dispute”

    Why this matters
    Reuters calls the payments a "tax" in its own voice, so it settles what the payments were.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established that Hamas was levying a tax on merchants.
    The context
    The article itself gives two accounts: COGAT says merchants reported payment demands, and Hamas says the fee was a voluntary contribution. Reuters does not attribute the word to either side.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“was a voluntary contribution by better-off Gazans”
    • Elsewhere in the article“merchants reported that Hamas authorities had withdrawn”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “it has not ended Israeli attacks”

    In its own voice Reuters says Israeli attacks continued after the ceasefire. It does not let the ceasefire suggest the killing stopped.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Reuters

  1. 22 OctIsraeli fire kills four people in Gaza, medics say7.3
  2. 20 OctIsraeli fire kills four people in Gaza, medics say3.0
  3. 19 OctWorld Food Programme cuts aid to 500,000 Palestinians in Gaza, cites funding shortages0.0
  4. 16 OctItaly names senior Israelis, Katz in probe over Gaza flotilla activists3.0
  5. 16 OctUN says Gaza malnutrition gains fragile as commercial supplies halt6.0

Everything we scored from Reuters