The Independent, on Iran, 4 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Iran leads global reactions to Trump’s midterms disaster:

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Become an Independent member to bookmark this article Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Membership today. Join today Already a member? Log in With the world closely watching a historic defeat for the Republicans in Tuesday’s midterms election , Iran has said the results are an emphatic public rejection of Donald Trump ’s war in the Middle East. Though results are still being counted, the Democrats have been projected as clear winners in the race to control both houses of Congress .

Iranian parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said the results showed Americans were opposed to war, suggesting voters had punished the Trump administration over the conflict and its economic consequences. In a post on X, Mr Ghalibaf wrote: “Conscience or the cost of living, Americans said NO TO WAR, and we endorse this message. If the US govt betrays their public will to serve international paymasters and blackmailers, it will learn our NO comes with a Nightmare.”

Mr Trump himself acknowledged that the war with Iran may have contributed to his party’s electoral losses. He nonetheless refused to take personal blame for the defeat, claiming that if his name had been on ballots the Republicans would have won “by a landslide”. On X, Iran’s mission in India posted an AI video mocking Mr Trump, which showed four men carrying the president out of the White House and throwing him into a rubbish bin with the words “Hazardous Waste” written on it.

International coverage of the results has largely framed it as a message to the president, with Le Monde , the Parisian newspaper, calling the election a “stunning rebuke for Trump” and a “major blow” for a leader who spent “nearly every day of the last month holding rallies to energise his supporters”. Global markets have fallen slightly on the Democrats ’ strong performance, reflecting investor concerns that tighter regulation and local restrictions could slow America’s AI infrastructure boom.

The Financial Times reported that investors were particularly concerned about Democratic victories in Texas and Ohio , major data-centre hubs, where governors have powers over construction permits, zoning and potential building moratoriums. The Nasdaq 100 futures fell 0.7 per cent, while Japan’s Nikkei dropped 2.7 per cent and South Korea’s Kospi fell as much as 4 per cent. Asian technology stocks, including SoftBank, Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, also came under pressure.

“Asia is not very good at digesting US political risk or news flow,” William Bratton, head of Asia-Pacific cash equity research at BNP Paribas told the outlet, suggesting that the market has “overreacted”. The British government said that it will continue to have an “excellent relationship” with Mr Trump’s administration despite the electoral drubbing. Health minister James Frith said: “It looks like an enormous night for American democracy and for the Democrats.

We will see where the final numbers end up, but it looks like a seismic shift in domestic politics for the Americans.” Mr Frith said the result would not fundamentally change the UK-US relationship. He told Times Radio : “The change of emphasis of power in the States is frequent. But the mainstay of the relationship with the UK Government, as its closest ally, is unwavering and unchanging. “So I don’t expect it to change the nature of the relationship at all, it remains very strong.”

China said that it was willing to continue working with the United States to implement the consensus reached by the leaders of both countries during Xi Jinping’s recent state visit to Washington. Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said on Wednesday that Beijing was also willing to work on improving communication with Washington, adding that the midterms result was a matter of “US internal affairs”. An Italian MEP (Member of the European Parliament), Ilaria Salis wrote on X: “Crushing defeat for Donald Trump, the ally-master of the pseudo-patriots in Italy and Europe.

A victory made possible also by the growing strength of the socialist component within the American Democratic Party. Meloni, you’re next! The wind is changing…#NOKINGS.”

Read the original article on independent.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Independent reports international reactions to the Democrats' midterm gains, leading with Iran's parliament speaker and giving his words with attribution. Its headline puts in quotation marks a phrase, 'Americans are saying no to war', that nobody in the article says; Mr Ghalibaf's actual words are 'Americans said NO TO WAR'. Otherwise the body attributes each claim to its source and does not mislead.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “‘Americans are saying no to war’”

    Why this matters
    The headline puts the words 'Americans are saying no to war' in quotation marks, with no speaker named in the headline itself.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes this as a verbatim quotation from someone, and may take it as the outlet's own summary of the vote.
    The context
    Nobody in the article says these words. The only source is Iranian parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, who wrote 'Americans said NO TO WAR' on X. The meaning is close, but the quotation marks attach to a phrase of the outlet's making, and the headline drops who said it.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Americans said NO TO WAR, and we endorse this message.”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “Iranian parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said the results showed Americans were opposed to war”

    The article reports Iran's reading of the vote as the claim of a named official, not as the outlet's own conclusion.

  • “Mr Trump himself acknowledged that the war with Iran may have contributed to his party’s electoral losses.”

    The article sets Trump's own admission alongside Iran's claim, so the link between the war and the vote rests on more than one party's word.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Independent

  1. 3 NovMore bombing, a nuclear strike or a peace deal: Three scenarios for the war in Iran after the midterms3.0
  2. 3 NovIran's chief negotiator says the US must act to prevent renewed war, and other Mideast news6.0
  3. 3 NovUS strikes Iran with explosions heard on Qeshm Island in Strait of Hormuz0.0
  4. 3 NovUS military attacks Iran's Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz on the eve of midterm elections6.0
  5. 3 NovStreeting condemns Iran for labelling RAF and Royal Navy terrorist organisations6.0

Everything we scored from The Independent