Press TV, on Iran, 26 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Tehran quadrilateral meeting fruit of Iranian nation’s resistance and Armed Forces’ valor: Bagheri Kani

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.5 findings

A senior Iranian security official has described Monday’s quadrilateral meeting in Tehran between Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey as the direct fruit of the Iranian nation’s heroic resistance and the triumphant valor of the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Speaking after the high-level gathering hosted by Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) Secretary Major General Mohsen Rezaei, Deputy Secretary of SNSC Ali Bagheri Kani said the meeting reflected a shared understanding among the four parties of the need for cooperation, even as priorities and approaches differ.

He stressed that relying on internal capabilities remains the key to progress and security.

“Some regional countries once imagined that by aligning themselves with a major power like the United States they could shield themselves from any threat. In practice, however, they discovered that this notion did not align with reality,” Bagheri Kani said.

“Consequently, these nations have concluded that there is no alternative but to rely on regional engagement and to establish security based on cooperation and synergy among the countries of the region,” he stated.

He noted that Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey had previously held meetings among themselves and had expressed strong interest in Iranian participation, but conditions for Tehran’s attendance were not met. Later, the three countries themselves proposed traveling to Iran so the gathering could take place in Tehran.

During a recent visit to the Iranian capital, Pakistan’s Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir conveyed to Major General Mohsen Rezaei that one of the primary objectives of his trip was to inform Iranian officials of the three nations’ desire to convene jointly in Tehran.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says that the Saudi Foreign Ministry described the Pakistan-initiated visit as an effort to prevent further escalation. Nor does it say the meeting took place as Iran-backed Houthi forces were attacking Saudi Arabia. Without this, the reader believes the visitors came to Tehran as the fruit of Iran's victory and to join a consensus around Iran. Saudi Arabia, a party to the meeting, presented it as de-escalation while it was under attack.

How we know

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article describes Munir's earlier trip only as conveying the three nations' wish to meet in Tehran. It does not mention that he presented Tehran with a diplomatic proposal after receiving Trump's approval to pursue negotiations. That leaves the reader unaware that the gathering was tied to a US-approved mediation effort.

How we know

Bagheri Kani linked the momentum for such dialogue to the destabilizing role of the Zionist regime.

He said that in recent years the regime had sought to project power but in reality only demonstrated its savagery and an unbridled appetite for expansion.

The concept of a “Greater Israel,” which encompasses many nations in the region, . .

The Tehran meeting took place in the wake of significant strategic developments driven primarily by the and .

Bagheri Kani emphasized that the resistance of Iran’s Armed Forces and people, under the prudent leadership of Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Mojtaba Khamenei, not only thwarted the United States from achieving its objectives but left it in a state of desperation.

The Zionist regime, he added, is also not in a favorable position; the scenario it envisioned following its aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran did not unfold according to its plans.

He highlighted two fundamental points: first, that the Islamic Republic of Iran, relying on its own national and internal capabilities, stood firm against two overt acts of aggression by two different regimes and succeeded in both instances; second, that the capacity to counter these aggressions stemmed entirely from domestic resources.

“Our equipment and weaponry are the products of the intellect and ingenuity of our nation’s young scientists, as well as the efforts of our nation’s industrial experts and technologists. These capabilities were effectively proven in the field,” he stated.

Despite decades of Western sanctions aimed at denying Iran advanced equipment and technology, particularly in the military sphere, the advancements achieved through the dedication of young personnel within the Armed Forces have proven their efficacy.

“The clearest evidence of this is the fact that both the United States and the Zionist regime failed to achieve their objectives,” Bagheri Kani stated. Sanctions have taken on new forms, while .

The quadrilateral talks, also attended on the Iranian side by Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, brought together Saudi Defense Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman, Pakistani Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir, and Turkish intelligence chief Ibrahim Kalin.

A joint statement issued afterward said the participants agreed to continue the dialogue to strengthen cooperation among the four regional countries, including for peace and security in the region.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian separately hosted the visiting officials and underscored support for any understandings that reinforce unity and constructive cooperation among Muslim nations in West Asia.

The gathering aligns with broader efforts to advance endogenous security in the region, .

Read the original article on presstv.ir (opens in a new tab)
What we found (5)

Press TV reports the Tehran quadrilateral meeting largely through Ali Bagheri Kani's account. It then repeats his case in its own voice: Iran's model is "successful", the region has reached a "consensus" around Iran, and the US government is a "terrorist administration". It leaves out what other outlets reported: Pakistan initiated the visit, Saudi Arabia said its aim was to prevent further escalation, and the meeting came as Iran-backed Houthi forces were attacking Saudi Arabia.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “has underscored that the regime acts as a source of instability”

    Why this matters
    Press TV states, with no speaker attached, that the "Greater Israel" concept proves Israel is a source of instability. The words follow Bagheri Kani's remarks but carry no "he said".
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes this as the outlet's established finding rather than one official's argument.
    The context
    This is Bagheri Kani's political argument, set out in the sentences before it. Press TV drops the attribution and adopts it as its own conclusion.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Bagheri Kani linked the momentum for such dialogue”

    Show it in the article

    “This recognition has created a framework for consensus among regional countries aimed at establishing internal security, making bilateral and multilateral meetings centered on the Islamic Republic of Iran a necessary undertaking”

    Why this matters
    Press TV asserts in its own voice that a regional consensus exists and that meetings centred on Iran are now a necessity.
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Turkey share Iran's view and have organised their diplomacy around Tehran.
    The context
    Bagheri Kani himself said priorities and approaches differ. The Saudi Foreign Ministry described the visit, initiated by Pakistan, as an effort to prevent further escalation, not as a consensus centred on Iran.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “drawing on Iran’s successful model of national security-building through indigenous capabilities and the participation of regional actors, free from foreign interference”

    Why this matters
    Press TV closes the article by calling Iran's security model "successful". It also says the gathering draws on that model, in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    The reader leaves believing the other three states came to Tehran to follow an Iranian model.
    The context
    Other reports describe a Pakistan-initiated effort to ease tensions. Munir also carried a proposal under which Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Pakistan and Qatar could act as guarantors of a future agreement. Nothing in the material shows the visitors adopting an Iranian model.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Bagheri Kani argued that the region was moving towards a consensus on security without outside powers. The Saudi Foreign Ministry said the Pakistan-initiated visit was intended to prevent further escalation.

  2. Smears a named person

    Minor

    “the terrorist administration of the United States”

    Why this matters
    Press TV labels the US government a "terrorist administration" in its own narration, with no speaker attached and no facts given for the charge.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes terrorism as an established description of the US government.
    The context
    The article gives no evidence for the label and attributes it to no one. Other outlets report US strikes on Iran and a US blockade of Iranian ports, and describe these without the terrorism charge.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “brutal aggression of the Zionist regime”

    Why this matters
    Press TV calls Israel "the Zionist regime" in its own narration, outside any quotation.
    The impression it gives
    The reader receives a political verdict on Israel's government as the outlet's plain description.
    The context
    The sentence carries no attribution. "Zionist regime" belongs inside quotation marks, attributed to whoever used it.

    Show it in the article

    “the horrific and barbaric nature of those imposing them has become increasingly apparent to the world”

    Why this matters
    Press TV calls those imposing sanctions "horrific and barbaric" in its own voice. It also claims the world increasingly sees them that way.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes a moral verdict and an unsourced claim about world opinion as reported fact.
    The context
    No speaker or source is given for either the verdict or the claim about how the world sees it.

    Show it in the article

  4. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says that the Saudi Foreign Ministry described the Pakistan-initiated visit as an effort to prevent further escalation. Nor does it say the meeting took place as Iran-backed Houthi forces were attacking Saudi Arabia. Without this, the reader believes the visitors came to Tehran as the fruit of Iran's victory and to join a consensus around Iran. Saudi Arabia, a party to the meeting, presented it as de-escalation while it was under attack.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  5. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article describes Munir's earlier trip only as conveying the three nations' wish to meet in Tehran. It does not mention that he presented Tehran with a diplomatic proposal after receiving Trump's approval to pursue negotiations. That leaves the reader unaware that the gathering was tied to a US-approved mediation effort.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Press TV

  1. 26 OctVessels violating Iran’s protocols in southern waters will suffer damage: Top commander3.0
  2. 26 OctLeader outlines roadmap for an ‘ever-stronger Iran,’ urges elites to break scientific boundaries3.0
  3. 26 OctIran, Pakistan, Turkey, Saudi Arabia hold security meeting in Tehran7.3
  4. 26 OctIran’s president urges regional unity as he hosts Pakistani, Saudi, Turkish officials3.0
  5. 26 OctIran, Turkey, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia could advance region-led security framework in Tehran: FM spox3.0

Everything we scored from Press TV

See how 187 outlets covered this story