Press TV, on Iran, 26 October 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

Iran, Pakistan, Turkey, Saudi Arabia hold security meeting in Tehran

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

Delegations from Iran, Pakistan, Turkey and Saudi Arabia have begun a meeting in Tehran, with regional security, the consequences of US-Israeli military aggression and support for the Palestinians and Lebanese among the main topics of discussion.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never mentions that the meeting took place as the Houthis launched new attacks on Saudi Arabia and Egypt approved military support for the kingdom. Nor does it say that the war had expanded to Saudi Arabia and Yemen. Without this, a reader believes the Saudi delegation came only to discuss the US-Israeli war and solidarity with Palestine and Lebanon. In fact Saudi Arabia was itself under attack by a group other outlets describe as Iran-backed.

How we know

The meeting, which kicked off on Monday, was proposed by Pakistan and held with Iran’s support and cooperation.

Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) Major General Mohsen Rezaei is hosting the gathering.

Pakistan’s Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir, Saudi Defense Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman and Turkish National Intelligence Organization Director Ibrahim Kalin are representing their respective countries.

Iran's SNSC Secretary Major General Rezaei welcomes senior officials from Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan as a four-way meeting gets underway in Tehran.

— Press TV 🔻 (@PressTV) October 26, 2026

The talks will focus on regional security, the fallout from military aggression, and support for Palestine and Lebanon. pic.twitter.com/Muc4XunUp6

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi also attended the four-way meeting.

Before the meeting, the three representatives met with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian.

Deputy Secretary of the SNSC Ali Bagheri Kani said earlier in the day that the visit by senior Saudi, Pakistani and Turkish officials to Tehran aims to promote regional security and draw on Iran’s defense experience during the 40-day war imposed by the United States and Israel.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article gives only an Iranian official's account of the visit's purpose: promoting security and drawing on Iran's defence experience. It omits that the Saudi Foreign Ministry said the visit was meant to prevent further escalation. It also omits that, according to a Pakistani official, Munir brought a diplomatic proposal approved by Trump, with Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Pakistan and Qatar as possible guarantors. Without this, a reader believes the visitors came to learn from Iran rather than to broker de-escalation and possible US-Iran talks.

How we know

“Iran’s defense model, based on its indigenous capabilities, has become a successful model for ensuring national security.”

Meanwhile, a senior Iranian official told Reuters that Iran would hold no nuclear discussions with the three officials until the United States meets Tehran’s conditions for a permanent end to the war, including lifting the blockade, easing oil sanctions and ending hostilities on all regional fronts.

The United States and Israel waged their against Iran on February 28.

In response, the Iranian armed forces launched decisive retaliatory attacks against US and Israeli assets in the region.

The war came to a halt after 40 days with a ceasefire, which was then formalized in mid-June through the signing of the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) by the presidents of Iran and the United States.

Read the original article on presstv.ir (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

Press TV reports the four-way security meeting in Tehran accurately on who attended and what Iran said about nuclear talks. In its own voice it rules that the US and Israeli war on Iran was illegal and that Washington has broken the ceasefire memorandum, with no source for either. It leaves out the Houthi attacks on Saudi Arabia and the Saudi and Pakistani account of the visit as a de-escalation effort, so the reader gets only Tehran's picture of why the delegations came.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “Washington has violated the MoU since.”

    Why this matters
    Press TV states in its own voice, as the article's closing line, that Washington has violated the Islamabad memorandum. It names no source, no violation and no date.
    The impression it gives
    The reader comes away believing a US breach of the ceasefire deal is an established fact.
    The context
    This is Iran's position, not a finding the article supports. Nothing in the article describes what the violation was or who says so, and none of the other coverage of the meeting reports it as fact.

    Show it in the article

    “illegal war of aggression”

    Why this matters
    Press TV calls the war "illegal" in its own narration and gives no ruling, body or official as the source of that legal verdict.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes the illegality of the war as settled in law.
    The context
    Other coverage agrees the war began with Israeli and US strikes on Iran. The legal verdict is Iran's position and belongs attributed to whoever makes it, with any supporting ruling named. The article offers none.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    The article gives only an Iranian official's account of the visit's purpose: promoting security and drawing on Iran's defence experience. It omits that the Saudi Foreign Ministry said the visit was meant to prevent further escalation. It also omits that, according to a Pakistani official, Munir brought a diplomatic proposal approved by Trump, with Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Pakistan and Qatar as possible guarantors. Without this, a reader believes the visitors came to learn from Iran rather than to broker de-escalation and possible US-Iran talks.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never mentions that the meeting took place as the Houthis launched new attacks on Saudi Arabia and Egypt approved military support for the kingdom. Nor does it say that the war had expanded to Saudi Arabia and Yemen. Without this, a reader believes the Saudi delegation came only to discuss the US-Israeli war and solidarity with Palestine and Lebanon. In fact Saudi Arabia was itself under attack by a group other outlets describe as Iran-backed.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Press TV

  1. 26 OctVessels violating Iran’s protocols in southern waters will suffer damage: Top commander3.0
  2. 26 OctTehran quadrilateral meeting fruit of Iranian nation’s resistance and Armed Forces’ valor: Bagheri Kani6.0
  3. 26 OctLeader outlines roadmap for an ‘ever-stronger Iran,’ urges elites to break scientific boundaries3.0
  4. 26 OctIran’s president urges regional unity as he hosts Pakistani, Saudi, Turkish officials3.0
  5. 26 OctIran, Turkey, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia could advance region-led security framework in Tehran: FM spox3.0

Everything we scored from Press TV

See how 187 outlets covered this story