City AM, on UK Politics, 1 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Healey has left £49bn blackhole in Britain’s finances, claims Badenoch

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

John Healey has left the UK with a £49bn black hole that will require substantial tax increases, Kemi Badenoch has claimed. The Conservative party leader said Labour would have to raise taxes by £,1,700 per household annually by the 2030/31 financial year to pay for unfunded spending promises. In particular, Badenoch accused the Chancellor of failing to explain how he would meet his defence spending target of three per cent of GDP, arguing there would be an £11bn shortfall in the 2030/31 tax year.

“Rather than setting out how we will find the funding…which the Chancellor once said he was certain Britain needed for our own security, we just had vague commitments,” Badenoch wrote in the The Telegraph. Worst yet to come? Away from the Budget, Burnham has also pledged to create a National Care Service, which economists anticipate will cost up to £18bn annually. The prime minister announced plans to adjust the triple lock from 2030, effectively creating a double lock, using the savings to fund the new service, but this is not expected to completely cover Burnham’s plans.

Coupled with ambitions for council housing, Badenoch has accused Healey of creating a “£49bn black hole at the heart of the public finances”. Badenoch said: “Who’s going to pay for it? The prime minister gave the game away on Friday when he said he would have written the 2024 manifesto differently. “Let me translate that. He wishes he had more room to raise taxes even further.” Labour’s ‘welfare addiction’ She went on to accuse prime minister Andy Burnham of failing to make “tough decisions in the national interest”, instead “putting them off”.

She said: “After 100 days in office, all Burnham has got is a plan to publish a plan at some point…either they’ll have to do another Budget, perhaps before an early election, or families are in for a nasty shock.” Badenoch also called out Labour’s tax rises, with Healey’s predecessor hiking taxes on homes, pensions and farms. Healey himself increased taxes on savings, rental properties and banks. The Conservative leader .

“The country is living well beyond its means, but Andy Burnham and John Healey are making it worse,” Badenoch said. “This Government is kicking the can down the road to the end of Parliament, pretending that the same Labour MPs who blocked Keir Starmer’s tiny welfare savings are going to allow spending cuts right before a general election.”

Read the original article on cityam.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

City AM reports Kemi Badenoch's claim of a £49bn black hole in the public finances and keeps it attributed to her in the headline and body. The article gives the whole piece to her case and prints no Labour or Treasury reply, though the outlet had published Healey's own account of the benefits bill earlier the same morning.

  1. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “pinned Labour hiked taxes to the party’s inability to break its “welfare addiction””

    Why this matters
    These words carry Badenoch's charge of a Labour "welfare addiction". Like every other claim in the piece, no government response follows it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader meets only the Conservative leader's account of Labour's spending and welfare record, with nothing from the Chancellor or the Treasury against it.
    The context
    City AM had published Healey's own account of the benefits bill about an hour earlier, including his claim that its growth has slowed under Labour. The article runs from headline to close on Badenoch's words, and Labour appears only as the target of her claims.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “claims Badenoch”

    The headline keeps the £49bn figure as Badenoch's claim rather than stating it as City AM's own fact.

  • “Kemi Badenoch has claimed”

    The opening sentence attributes the black hole figure and the need for tax rises to the person who made the claim.

  • “arguing there would be an £11bn shortfall”

    The defence funding gap is reported as Badenoch's argument, not as an established figure.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from City AM

  1. 1 NovLabour will reduce ballooning benefits bill, claims John Healey3.0
  2. 30 OctRevealed: The luxury London pads getting Healey’s energy handout – while poorer areas miss out6.0
  3. 30 OctNext phase of workers rights overhaul risks hammering ‘labour market’3.0
  4. 30 OctBurnham’s former economic adviser gives Budget a four out of 100.0
  5. 30 OctThe OBR is clear: Not a single measure from this Budget will raise growth3.0

Everything we scored from City AM