The Telegraph, on West Bank, 25 October 2026

8.8out of 10Serious

Israel imposes military lockdown on West Bank

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.5 findings

The Israeli military has , closing all border crossings and prohibiting Palestinian workers from . The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said Palestinian workers “will not be permitted” to enter Israeli settlements in the West Bank “with the exception of industrial zones and a limited number of other approved areas”. The army added that the government had decided to impose a ban on the entry and exit of Palestinian workers throughout the West Bank , including industrial zones, after a “recommendation by the security establishment”.

The move will affect some 9,000 Palestinians who, according to data from last year, have permits to work in settlements and industrial zones. The decision to impose a lockdown comes after a shooting attack committed by two Palestinians in the West Bank on Friday morning left two Israeli soldiers dead. The assailants, Mohammad Jaaba and Firas Jaaba, both 27 years old, were killed during their attack on a military checkpoint near Hebron, where they both resided.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The Telegraph presents the lockdown only as a response to Friday's shooting. It never mentions that the closure runs through Israel's national election on Tuesday. It also omits that the army imposed similar restrictions on Palestinians during previous elections, and that this was the fourth closure in a month, which its own earlier report stated. Without this, a reader believes the lockdown is a one-off security reaction to the attack.

How we know

Eyal Zamir, the head of the IDF, said that “a large quantity of ammunition” had been found in their vehicle, and that it had been “intended to be used to carry out a larger-scale attack”. Following the attack against the checkpoint near Hebron, Benjamin Netanyahu , the Israeli prime minister, announced “a very broad IDF operation in Judea and Samaria [the West Bank], the likes of which have not been done since the Six-Day War”. He added: “The IDF is ready to carry it out, and we will determine the timing, but it is on its way.”

Mr Netanyahu said that the IDF would “evacuate the residents [of Hebron], we will go house to house, we will remove the weapons there as well, and all the terrorist infrastructure will be dealt with and destroyed”. , targeting 40 areas and 400 locations during the weekend. About 40 Palestinians have been arrested, including members of Hamas and Islamic Jihad, and suspects involved in “incitement, public disorder, and rock-hurling”, according to the IDF.

In the northern West Bank, Israeli forces also dismantled memorials “commemorating terrorists who took part in terror attacks in which Israeli civilians were killed”, and arrested two Palestinians suspected of carrying out terror attacks in the area of Burin. . “Selected army units are now operating there.

They will not be allowed to return to their neighbourhood until we’ve finished dealing with all the Hamas issues in Hebron,” Mr Katz said. Since the Hamas-led terror attack on Oct 7, 2023, the IDF has launched several major operations . The operations forced tens of thousands of Palestinians to be displaced.

Read the original article on telegraph.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (5)

The Telegraph reports the West Bank lockdown and the Hebron operation largely in the army's and ministers' terms. In its own voice it calls the operation an anti-terror offensive and calls Jenin and Tulkarm Hamas and Islamic strongholds. It never tells the reader the West Bank is occupied or the settlements illegal. It ties the lockdown only to Friday's shooting, leaving out that the closure runs through Israel's election, as others and its own earlier report showed.

  1. Uses the occupation's words

    Serious

    “The IDF has since launched a major anti-terror offensive in Hebron and other areas of the West Bank”

    Why this matters
    The Telegraph adopts the army's label "anti-terror offensive" in its own voice, with no attribution, for a raid on a whole city.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the operation is a targeted strike on terrorists, as an established fact.
    The context
    The same article reports, through the defence minister, that about 2,000 Palestinians had been displaced in Hebron and barred from returning. Other outlets describe a siege of the city and the displacement of residents. "Anti-terror" is the army's description, not a fact the Telegraph established.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli occupation forces have since launched a major raid on Hebron and other areas of the occupied West Bank, which the army calls an anti-terror offensive, displacing about 2,000 Palestinians from Hebron according to the defence minister.

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “against Hamas and Islamic strongholds in the West Bank , including Jenin and Tulkarm”

    Why this matters
    The Telegraph calls Jenin and Tulkarm "Hamas and Islamic strongholds" in its own voice. The phrase brands whole places, home to refugee camps, as militant and religious bases.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes Jenin and Tulkarm were bases of armed groups, so the operations there were aimed at fighters.
    The context
    The Telegraph's own earlier report describes forced evacuations of the Jenin, Tulkarm and Nur al-Shams refugee camps, carried out on security grounds, that displaced tens of thousands of people. The article itself says the operations displaced tens of thousands of Palestinians. "Strongholds" is the army's justification stated as fact. "Islamic" attaches a religion to the label.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Since 7 October 2023, Israeli occupation forces have launched several major raids in the occupied West Bank, including on the Jenin and Tulkarm refugee camps, which Israel said targeted armed groups. The operations displaced tens of thousands of Palestinians.

  3. Hedges the documented record

    Serious

    “imposed a lockdown on the West Bank”

    Why this matters
    The Telegraph names the West Bank throughout without once saying it is occupied. It also speaks of "border crossings" as if they lay between two states.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes Israel is closing its border with a neighbouring territory, not imposing military rule on people it occupies.
    The context
    The ICJ found Israel's occupation of the West Bank unlawful. Other outlets reporting the same event call it the occupied West Bank. The Times of Israel and Middle East Eye describe the crossings as land crossings into Israel.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “entering Israeli settlements”

    Why this matters
    The Telegraph calls the settlements simply "Israeli settlements" here and in S2. It never says they sit on occupied land or are illegal.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the settlements are ordinary Israeli towns that Palestinian workers are being kept out of.
    The context
    The ICJ found Israel's settlements in the West Bank illegal under international law. The article turns on Palestinian access to them.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli occupation forces have imposed a lockdown on the occupied West Bank, closing land crossings into Israel and barring Palestinian workers from settlements the ICJ has found illegal.

  4. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    The Telegraph presents the lockdown only as a response to Friday's shooting. It never mentions that the closure runs through Israel's national election on Tuesday. It also omits that the army imposed similar restrictions on Palestinians during previous elections, and that this was the fourth closure in a month, which its own earlier report stated. Without this, a reader believes the lockdown is a one-off security reaction to the attack.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  5. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “Israel Katz, the defence minister, told Kan, Israel’s public broadcaster, on Saturday that about 2,000 Palestinians had been displaced in Hebron so far”

    Why this matters
    The Telegraph's only account of the displacement in Hebron comes from the Israeli defence minister. The army, the army chief, Netanyahu and Katz are all quoted, while no Palestinian speaks.
    The impression it gives
    A reader hears the operation described only by those carrying it out, with Palestinians reduced to counts of workers, arrests and displaced.
    The context
    Hebron's mayor described the city to Middle East Eye as "a disaster zone" on the same day. Palestinians are quoted least when the story concerns them.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Telegraph

Everything we scored from The Telegraph