The Telegraph, on Gaza, 28 September 2026

9.4out of 10Severe

How children’s YouTube entertainer Ms Rachel became

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.7 findings

From Andy Pandy onwards, children’s TV has been an apolitical sanctuary where parents can relax, knowing their little ones are being entertained by hosts as politically neutral as Topsy and Tim. It is an unwritten rule that presenters – whether on Blue Peter or CBeebies Bedtime Stories – steer clear of controversial topics both inside and outside the studio. But Rachel Accurso doesn’t seem to have received the memo. A total unknown to anyone without young children or grandchildren, the American YouTube educator – known as Ms Rachel – is as big as Beyoncé in the world of under-fours.

Her popular channel, Ms Rachel – Toddler Learning Videos , has more than 21 million subscribers and has had more than 16 billion views. Last year, she signed with Netflix and her series has been streamed more than 69 million times. Parents love her too – her gentle, slow-paced songs encouraging speech development in children have been praised by mothers and fathers worldwide for their evidence-based techniques (informed by Accurso’s master’s degree in music education).

She has also amassed a huge following on social media (11 million on TikTok and 5.5 million on Instagram), where she talks about parenting struggles, “mum guilt” and mental health. It makes the 43-year-old married mother-of-two from New York, who won a Glamour magazine Woman of the Year award in 2025, one of the most influential figures in early childhood education. But Accurso is also one of the most controversial, because in the seven years since she uploaded her first video, she has rarely shied away from sharing her views on various political issues of the day.

Whether it is family immigration detention centres in the United States or “LGBTQ+” rights (she received criticism from some quarters for using they/them pronouns for one non-binary musician), she is fast becoming an unlikely champion of the American Left. It is her opinions on that are attracting the most scrutiny, however. and intentionally targeting children, leading some to brand her anti-Semitic , something she vehemently denies.

“I care deeply for all children. Palestinian children, Israeli children, children in the US – Muslim, Jewish, Christian children – all children, in every country. Not one is excluded,” she wrote in the caption for one TikTok video. But earlier this month she prompted controversy again. The online star – whose annual earnings in 2025 were estimated at $26m (£19m) by Forbes magazine – announced she was matching the $1m donation to Palestinian aid organisations made by the rapper Macklemore, who was fired as the opening act on Ed Sheeran’s US tour after saying “Free Palestine” on stage in New Jersey.

“I invite every wealthy white celebrity to match it and speak out against the genocide in Gaza ,” she wrote on Instagram. “Over 20,000 precious Palestinian children have been killed, and children continue to be killed every day. We have a moral obligation to use our privilege and platforms to protect children and human rights.” Her supporters have praised her generosity. But her activism has generated more criticism, particularly considering her audience is mostly younger families.

“She’s the cuddly face of anti-Semitism,” says children’s author and mother of one Hilary Freeman. “Like Paloma Faith saying ‘Free Palestine’ to her young children every night, she epitomises the way that this particular cause has seeped into the culture as ‘proof’ of being ‘a good person’. “I’m sure she doesn’t believe she’s anti-Semitic, but she’s sharing Hamas propaganda to her adult followers on TikTok and Instagram. – some even as young as 13.

“But to what parents tell their children , because it’s the ‘caring, humanitarian woman from YouTube who does the nursery rhymes’ saying it, so it must be true.” Accurso grew up religious in the state of Maine. Raised alongside an older sister by a single mother, she announced at the age of nine that, even though her mother, Susannah, could no longer take her to church because Susannah had a new weekend job, she would attend by herself.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says in its own voice that Israeli occupation forces have killed Palestinians, including children, in Gaza. The only toll in the piece is Accurso's, and critics label it misinformation. A reader comes away believing that the killing of children in Gaza is itself an unproven claim, when Gaza's Ministry of Health records tens of thousands of Palestinians killed by the Israeli occupation.

How we know

  • On the recordGaza's Ministry of Health recorded the Israeli occupation as having killed 74,392 Palestinians, a cumulative toll that NewsCord's reading of BBC coverage cites as of October 2026.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
  • On the recordThe UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry found, on 16 September 2025, that Israel has committed genocide in the Gaza Strip.ohchr.org (opens in a new tab)

Later, she considered joining a seminary, but got the teaching bug while working at a school for children with disabilities and, in 2009, moved to New York to complete a master’s degree in music education. A long-standing fan of the performing arts, she met her husband, Aron, a composer and musician who has worked on Broadway productions such as Billy Elliot and Aladdin , shortly after moving to New York, and the couple had their first child, Thomas, in 2018.

Their second, Susannah, was born via surrogate last year, but it was Thomas’s severe speech delay, requiring expensive specialised therapy, that inspired the Accursos to make their first YouTube videos in 2019. When the pandemic spread across the globe in 2020, and parents were clamouring for ways to educate and entertain their children at home, the channel took off and soon hit one million subscribers. The bright, colourful videos – such as the recent Caterpillar Song , which has attracted 18 million views in one month – may look deceptively simple.

But Accurso’s degree, plus a second master’s in early childhood education, mean there is a gravitas behind the bubblegum aesthetic. There are also many ill-informed opinions about Israel on her social feeds, say her critics. After the atrocities of October 7 2023, Accurso posted several messages on Instagram and TikTok calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, and urged followers to donate to humanitarian organisations supporting Palestinian children.

Then, earlier this year, she was criticised for “liking” an Instagram post that read: “Free America from the Jews”. She said the “like” was an accident while she was trying to delete it and issued an apology, saying she was only human and “makes mistakes”. She has also featured Motaz Azaiza, a Palestinian photojournalist, whom she called her “friend”, in one of her videos.

In 2025, nominated Accurso for “anti-Semite of the year”, claiming that she had inflated death statistics coming out of Gaza and had shared “Hamas propaganda”. In a recent interview, Accurso defended her actions: “It’s good to criticise governments for violating children’s rights,” she said. “It’s something that everyone should be doing. Because we’re the grown-ups of this world and we’re meant to keep children safe.

And the fact that we are not is horrific.” She also refuses to work with “privileged” people who have not spoken out in defence of civilians in Gaza. “I’m not interested in working with them,” she says. “Because I feel like maybe, if we all said something, the genocide would stop.” A spokesman for Campaign Against Antisemitism says: “What Ms Rachel’s output shows is how, more generally, some people’s activism on Gaza can become a springboard for incitement against Jews and the West.

People need to understand why baseless comparisons between the democratically elected government of Israel and the blood-drenched Islamist dictators of Iran, plus obsessive calls to ‘Stop killing children’, can attract even more blatant anti-Semitic conspiracy theories like claims that Jews control America. “Too many activists advocating for ‘Palestine’ are either happy to stand by and watch this extremist hatred, or indeed revel in it.

That is a massive problem.” Despite the turbulence, Accurso’s popularity among her young audience prevails. This year, she was nominated for two Children’s & Family Emmy awards, and, true to form, arrived at the ceremony in a dress embroidered with handwritten messages from 11 children living in conflict zones in Sudan and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Her fans saluted her compassion. But that, as an influential figure in young children’s education, she should perhaps put phonics before politics.

Read the original article on telegraph.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (7)

The Telegraph casts Ms Rachel's description of Israel's killing in Gaza as her personal accusation and never tells readers that a UN Commission of Inquiry has found genocide or that the ICJ has issued provisional measures. It then lets critics call her child death toll misinformation and Hamas propaganda with nothing against it. Its headline turns a critic's phrase about antisemitism into the paper's own description of the pro-Palestine movement, and it states an unsourced charge against the journalist Motaz Azaiza as fact.

  1. Hedges the documented record

    Severe

    “She has repeatedly accused the Israeli government of committing genocide”

    Why this matters
    The words "accused" and "committing genocide" present the genocide as one entertainer's charge, which the next clause links to claims that she is antisemitic.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes that calling Israel's assault on Gaza a genocide is a fringe and inflammatory opinion held by Accurso.
    The context
    A UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry found in September 2025 that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza, and the ICJ has issued provisional measures in the genocide case. The article turns on whether her statements are legitimate, yet it never mentions either finding.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry found, on 16 September 2025, that Israel has committed genocide in the Gaza Strip.ohchr.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice has issued provisional measures in the genocide case against Israel; this is a documented finding, not an allegation awaiting a reporter's verdict.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “ICJ”, “Commission” and “inquiry”.

    Show it in the article

    “the Israel-Gaza conflict”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Telegraph calls Israel's genocide in Gaza "the Israel-Gaza conflict".
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the events are a two-sided conflict, and that only Accurso's opinion makes them a genocide.
    The context
    The documented record establishes genocide. The outlet's own label softens it before the reader meets her claims.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry found, on 16 September 2025, that Israel has committed genocide in the Gaza Strip.ohchr.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    She has repeatedly said Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, a finding a UN Commission of Inquiry also reached in September 2025. Some critics have called her antisemitic, which she denies.

  2. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Serious

    “That figure of 20,000 children includes a large percentage of 16 to 18-year-old young male combatants”

    Why this matters
    The Telegraph prints a children's author's claim that the child death toll is padded with combatants. It gives no source for the claim and no source for the figure itself.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the toll of children killed in Gaza has been shown to be inflated by teenage fighters.
    The context
    The article never says who recorded the figure. Gaza's Ministry of Health records the toll of Palestinians killed by the Israeli occupation. The article never tests the critic's claim against any record.

    How we know

    • On the recordGaza's Ministry of Health recorded the Israeli occupation as having killed 74,392 Palestinians, a cumulative toll that NewsCord's reading of BBC coverage cites as of October 2026.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “ministry”.

    Show it in the article

    “that kind of misinformation is bound to seep down”

    Why this matters
    The critic's label "misinformation" ends the passage on the death toll. The article moves straight on to Accurso's childhood.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is left believing Accurso's statement that children are being killed in Gaza has been established as misinformation.
    The context
    Nothing in the article shows the figure is false. The reader gets only one critic's word, with no response from Accurso and no check on the claim.

    How we know

    • On the recordGaza's Ministry of Health recorded the Israeli occupation as having killed 74,392 Palestinians, a cumulative toll that NewsCord's reading of BBC coverage cites as of October 2026.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Freeman claims the figure includes teenage combatants, but she gives no source. Gaza's Ministry of Health records the Palestinians killed by Israeli occupation forces, and the article does not test her claim against that record.

  3. Headline goes beyond the article

    Serious

    “the ‘cuddly face’ of the pro-Palestine movement”

    Why this matters
    The headline takes the words "cuddly face" from a critic who called Accurso the cuddly face of antisemitism. It attaches them to the pro-Palestine movement and gives no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the Telegraph itself describes her this way. The borrowed phrase also quietly equates the pro-Palestine movement with what the critic called antisemitism.
    The context
    Only one critic used the phrase, and she used it about antisemitism. Nobody in the article calls her the cuddly face of the pro-Palestine movement.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the cuddly face of anti-Semitism”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Children's YouTube star Ms Rachel faces criticism over her outspoken stance on Gaza.

  4. Smears a named person

    Serious

    “Azaiza has admitted deliberately withholding footage of Israeli hostages being beaten by a crowd in Gaza on October 7.”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Telegraph states that the Palestinian photojournalist Motaz Azaiza "admitted" deliberately hiding footage of hostages being beaten. It gives no source, no quote and no response from him.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes Azaiza is an established propagandist who concealed abuse, and that Accurso is tainted by calling him a friend.
    The context
    The article offers nothing to back the allegation: no interview, no statement and no report. It is a grave charge against a named journalist resting on the outlet's word alone.

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    She has also featured the Palestinian photojournalist Motaz Azaiza, whom she called her friend, in one of her videos.

  5. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “many believe”

    Why this matters
    The article closes on an unattributed "many believe" that she should put phonics before politics.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes a broad consensus has formed against her speaking about Gaza.
    The context
    No source is given for "many". The only critics named in the article are one author and two lobby groups.

    Show it in the article

  6. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “watchdog group StopAntisemitism”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Telegraph calls StopAntisemitism a "watchdog group".
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes a neutral monitor has judged her, rather than a campaign group making an accusation.
    The context
    The article gives nothing about the group's methods or its independence that would support the neutral label.

    Show it in the article

  7. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says in its own voice that Israeli occupation forces have killed Palestinians, including children, in Gaza. The only toll in the piece is Accurso's, and critics label it misinformation. A reader comes away believing that the killing of children in Gaza is itself an unproven claim, when Gaza's Ministry of Health records tens of thousands of Palestinians killed by the Israeli occupation.

    How we know

    • On the recordGaza's Ministry of Health recorded the Israeli occupation as having killed 74,392 Palestinians, a cumulative toll that NewsCord's reading of BBC coverage cites as of October 2026.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry found, on 16 September 2025, that Israel has committed genocide in the Gaza Strip.ohchr.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show where it belongs

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Telegraph

Everything we scored from The Telegraph