Ynet News (English), on Lebanon, 5 November 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.6 findings

The pilot program in Lebanon is increasingly looking like a failure, with potentially serious security consequences for Israel. More than 100 days have passed since the IDF handed control of three villages in southern Lebanon to the Lebanese army, but Hezbollah is gradually returning to the areas it evacuated.

Instead of the gradual dismantling of Hezbollah's infrastructure and the expansion of Lebanese army control, is managing to return to the area, reactivate parts of its civilian networks and reestablish its influence among the local population.

As the results of the pilot become increasingly clear, in Lebanon for the first time in several weeks. The military deployed a Zik drone against in the southern Lebanese village of Qabrikha, killing at least one of them. The man killed was identified as Nasr Mohammed Younes, a medical team member with the Amal movement's Risala Scouts. The relatively unusual targeted strike was the first in several weeks against suspects who, according to Israeli security officials, posed an immediate threat to troops by approaching too closely.

the IDF's ongoing strikes against Hezbollah infrastructure.

Against the backdrop of the pilot's apparent failure is political uncertainty in both Israel and the United States. Talks between the parties over a mechanism to monitor the agreement have been stalled for months, and there is still no agreement on how to ensure that the Lebanese army is actually dismantling Hezbollah's infrastructure. Israeli officials say the Lebanese army is not conducting sufficient searches and, as previously reported, is avoiding entering private homes or searching private property.

The IDF, meanwhile, , although with significantly fewer troops than during the ground maneuver and the period leading up to the demolition of the tunnel network beneath the Ali al-Taher Ridge in early September. Troops continue clearing the area and preparing for the possibility of renewed fighting. Since completing operations on the ridge, the forces have shifted to a defensive deployment, with a much smaller presence than during the period of intensive operations.

The military does not disclose details about the devices it intercepts along the northern border, but at least some are believed to be Hezbollah drones used for reconnaissance and surveillance.

One of the clearest examples of the gap between the pilot's objectives and the reality on the ground comes from Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh, the village where implementation of the arrangement began. After the Lebanese army deployed there in late July 2026, Hezbollah-affiliated organizations began reappearing. Reports and footage collected by the Alma Research and Education Center indicate the return of civilian organizations linked to Hezbollah, including the Islamic Health Organization and the Wataawano Association, whose name means "Help One Another."

In other words, it is not only residents who are returning to the village, but also organizations affiliated with Hezbollah.

Hezbollah's comeback

In one video, members of Hezbollah's Islamic Health Organization are seen recovering the bodies of the group's operatives in the village, accompanied by Lebanese army personnel. The fact that the organization itself publicly released documentation of the activity indicates that its presence is open, rather than concealed from the Lebanese military. The Islamic Health Organization, which operates under Hezbollah's Executive Council, provides medical services.

But according to information presented by the Alma Center, it also forms part of the organization's broader support network.

The Wataawano Association, another civilian organization affiliated with Hezbollah, has also returned to the village. The association describes itself as a charity, but an analysis of publicly available materials indicates that its activities also serve to establish influence and create social and economic dependence among local residents.

The activity in Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh is not an isolated incident. Since the first ceasefire in November 2024, the Wataawano Association has launched a campaign to install dozens of portable structures across southern Lebanon, ostensibly to provide temporary housing for residents whose homes were damaged. However, , providing an alternative network to facilities previously associated with the Green Without Borders organization, which had been targeted by the IDF.

Some of the new structures were subsequently destroyed by Israeli forces.

The test in Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh is not simply about who finances reconstruction or who delivers housing units to residents. The central question is who is actually present on the ground, who distributes assistance, who accompanies residents as they return and who they perceive as the authority providing for their needs. The emerging picture suggests that Hezbollah and Amal continue to play a central role in civilian life alongside Lebanese state institutions.

Additional footage from October demonstrates that this presence extends beyond Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh. In Froun, another village included in the pilot, Lebanese army soldiers were documented alongside members of Hezbollah's Islamic Health Organization and Amal's Risala Scouts during the recovery of a body following an explosion caused by remnants of war. As in the first pilot village, civilian organizations affiliated with the Shiite movements were seen operating alongside Lebanese soldiers.

From Israel's perspective, the situation is particularly troubling because the pilot was intended to test whether the Lebanese army could fill the vacuum left by the IDF and prevent Hezbollah's return. Yet on the ground, at least in some of the areas meant to serve as a model for implementing the agreement, the organization's networks are becoming active again. Hezbollah does not necessarily need to display an overt military presence at this stage to reestablish its grip.

It can rely on its civilian organizations instead.

Israeli officials also assess that Hezbollah is using the current period to rebuild its military capabilities and prepare for the possibility of another round of fighting. At the same time, it is important to remember that Hezbollah is in its weakest position in years. Its military capabilities have suffered significant damage, and its standing within Lebanon has also been severely weakened. , is itself in a difficult position.

For its part, the IDF continues operating in the area, . But these activities are taking place under the restrictions of the agreement and in a reality in which, according to Israeli officials, the Lebanese army is failing to provide the response expected of it.

Yet the ability to change the situation does not depend on the IDF alone. Political uncertainty in Israel and the United States, combined with the deadlock over the monitoring mechanism and the lack of agreement on implementing existing understandings, has created a diplomatic impasse that makes decision-making increasingly difficult.

Read the original article on ynetnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (6)

Ynet calls the two men an Israeli drone attacked "suspects" in its own voice, though its only basis is Israeli security officials and it identifies the man killed, Nasr Mohammed Younes, as a medical team member with the Amal movement's Risala Scouts. It states Israeli officials' assessments of Hezbollah's rebuilding, and a claim about what temporary housing was intended for, as fact without attribution. It also calls the drone killing "the incident" and calls Hezbollah "the terrorist organization" in its own voice.

  1. Labels people on one side's word

    Serious

    “the IDF has struck suspects approaching its forces”

    Why this matters
    Ynet calls the people the IOF struck "suspects" in its own voice, with no attribution in this sentence.
    The impression it gives
    The two men were suspected fighters or a hostile threat, and the strike was aimed at legitimate targets.
    The context
    The only basis the article offers is Israeli security officials, and the article itself identifies the man killed as a medical team member with the Amal movement's Risala Scouts.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“according to Israeli security officials, posed an immediate threat”
    • Elsewhere in the article“a medical team member with the Amal movement's Risala Scouts”

    Show it in the article

    “two suspects riding a motorcycle”

    Why this matters
    Ynet repeats the label in the very sentence that reports the drone killing, so the dead man enters the story as a suspect before he is named.
    The impression it gives
    The man killed was a suspect, and the killing needs no further explanation.
    The context
    The next sentence names him as Nasr Mohammed Younes, a medic with the Risala Scouts. Nothing in the article shows he was suspected of anything beyond the Israeli officials' claim that he came too close.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The man killed was identified as Nasr Mohammed Younes”
    • Elsewhere in the article“according to Israeli security officials”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    An Israeli drone strike in Qabrikha killed Nasr Mohammed Younes, a medical team member with the Amal movement's Risala Scouts. Israeli security officials claimed the two men on the motorcycle posed a threat by approaching troops.

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “Hezbollah is exploiting this period to rebuild its capabilities, bring operatives back into the area and gather intelligence on IDF forces.”

    Why this matters
    Ynet states as established fact that Hezbollah is rebuilding, returning fighters and gathering intelligence, with no source.
    The impression it gives
    These activities are confirmed facts.
    The context
    Later the article presents the same claim as an assessment by Israeli officials, so in this sentence Ynet turns one party's assessment into its own statement.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Israeli officials also assess that Hezbollah is using”

    Show it in the article

    “some of the structures were also intended to allow Hezbollah to restore its civilian and intelligence activities in the south”

    Why this matters
    Ynet states as fact what temporary housing for residents with damaged homes was "intended" for, with no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    The housing units were proven to be cover for Hezbollah intelligence work, which then makes their destruction by Israeli forces in S30 look justified.
    The context
    The article's claims about these organisations rest on material from the Alma Research and Education Center, which this sentence drops.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Reports and footage collected by the Alma Research and Education Center”
    • Elsewhere in the article“according to information presented by the Alma Center”

    Show it in the article

  3. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “Hezbollah is back: Lebanese army fails to fill the vacuum left by IDF”

    Why this matters
    Ynet's headline declares as settled that Hezbollah is back and that the Lebanese army has failed.
    The impression it gives
    The pilot has definitively failed and Hezbollah has returned in force.
    The context
    The body says the pilot is "increasingly looking like a failure" and calls the failure "apparent". It limits the return to "at least in some of the areas" and says Hezbollah is in its weakest position in years. The claim that the Lebanese army is failing is attributed to Israeli officials.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“increasingly looking like a failure”
    • Elsewhere in the article“the pilot's apparent failure”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Hezbollah is in its weakest position in years”
    • Elsewhere in the article“according to Israeli officials, the Lebanese army is failing”

    Show it in the article

  4. Tells the event as something else

    Minor

    “continues to hold defensive positions”

    Why this matters
    Ynet describes IOF troops stationed inside southern Lebanon as holding "defensive positions".
    The impression it gives
    Israeli troops are defending against an attack rather than holding foreign territory.
    The context
    Israel invaded southern Lebanon and occupies a self-declared security zone there. Other coverage of the same campaign describes forces crossing into Lebanon and launching an assault.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “holding defensive positions and clearing territory”

    Why this matters
    Ynet repeats the defensive description in its closing passage, after reporting that the same forces killed a man in Qabrikha and destroyed housing units.
    The impression it gives
    The IOF presence in Lebanon is passive and defensive at the moment the article ends.
    The context
    The article itself reports a drone killing, ongoing strikes and demolition of structures, all inside Lebanese territory that Israel occupies.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the IDF's ongoing strikes against Hezbollah infrastructure”
    • Elsewhere in the article“subsequently destroyed by Israeli forces”
    • On the recordIsrael occupies a self-declared security zone in southern Lebanon.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

  5. Sanitises violence or disorder

    Minor

    “Tensions are already rising”

    Why this matters
    Ynet introduces a drone killing with the words "tensions are already rising".
    The impression it gives
    What follows is a rise in mutual friction.
    The context
    What follows is a single Israeli drone strike that killed a medic.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The military deployed a Zik drone”

    Show it in the article

    “The incident comes alongside”

    Why this matters
    Ynet calls the drone killing "the incident".
    The impression it gives
    It was a minor security event.
    The context
    An Israeli drone killed a named man, a member of a medical team.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The man killed was identified as Nasr Mohammed Younes”

    Show it in the article

  6. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “the terrorist organization”

    Why this matters
    Ynet calls Hezbollah "the terrorist organization" in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    Hezbollah is only a terrorist group.
    The context
    The article itself describes Hezbollah's civilian networks, medical services and political standing within Lebanon, which this label erases.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“its standing within Lebanon has also been severely weakened”

    Show it in the article

    “Its principal patron, Iran”

    Why this matters
    Ynet defines Hezbollah by its relationship to Iran in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    Hezbollah is chiefly an Iranian client rather than a Lebanese political actor.
    The context
    The article's own reporting on Hezbollah's role in civilian life in southern Lebanese villages shows a domestic political presence.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“continue to play a central role in civilian life”

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Ynet News (English)

  1. 4 NovIDF strikes suspects approaching troops in Lebanon for first time in weeks8.7
  2. 26 OctReport: Hezbollah rebuilds drone arsenal with Iranian cash, braces for renewed war with Israel3.0
  3. 26 OctHe flew a plane out of Beirut. Israel scrambled F-16s to intercept him3.0
  4. 21 OctIsrael, Lebanon hold US-mediated military talks as tensions mount over Hezbollah disarmament7.3
  5. 21 OctIsrael's olive oil harvest set to nearly double, but farmers warn of a ...0.0

Everything we scored from Ynet News (English)

See how 7 outlets covered this story