Reuters, on Gaza, 15 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Israel says commercial goods no longer entering Gaza

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Palestinians shop at a market in Nuseirat, in the central Gaza Strip, October 28, 2025. REUTERS/Mahmoud Issa/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights , opens new tab JERUSALEM, Oct 15 (Reuters) - Israel said commercial goods were no longer entering Gaza over what it said was a dispute over taxes between local merchants and Hamas, shutting off a vital source of food ​and other goods in the territory where the population is dependent on aid.

COGAT, the ‌Israeli military body that oversees humanitarian affairs in Gaza, made the announcement in a statement on Wednesday, citing what it said was a decision by Gazan merchants to stop coordinating with COGAT on the entry of commercial goods. Sign up here. It ​said the Gazan merchants had told COGAT that they had made the decision in ​response to a 10,000 shekel ($3,220) fee imposed by Hamas on each truck entering ⁠Gaza and a demand for 30% of all of their sales in Gaza to be carried ​out in cash.

Hamas later said that the 10,000 shekel fee was a voluntary payment by wealthy ​Gazans to a national fund that seeks to provide for those in need such as widows and orphans. It also said that cash payments were encouraged due to what it described as an acute cash shortage in the ​war-torn territory. A majority of Gazans are dependent on aid supplies, following three years of war, repeated ​displacement and severe restrictions imposed by Israel on aid deliveries.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

Reuters reports Hamas's explanation of the fee but not that Gaza's government media office rejected COGAT's account outright. It also omits that the truckers' union head Nahed Shhaibar, whom the article quotes only on truck counts, said Israel imposed the restrictions, and that Palestinian importers denied the claim. Without this, a reader believes the merchants' decision to stop coordinating is undisputed and that Israel is merely relaying it.

How we know

A global hunger monitor in July warned that more than two ‌thirds ⁠of Gazans could face acute hunger by the year-end. Around 2 million Gazans live in the territory, most in makeshift shelters. Nahed Shhaibar, the head of the private transport union in Gaza, said that not a single truck carrying commercial products from Israel entered Gaza on Thursday. However, he said trucks ​carrying humanitarian aid had ​entered, as had trucks ⁠carrying commercial goods from Egypt via an Israeli-controlled crossing.

COGAT said the decision by Gazan merchants would cut the total number of trucks, which carry ​both humanitarian and commercial goods, entering Gaza each day to around 300 — ​or half. Diplomats say ⁠that far fewer than 600 trucks normally enter Gaza each day. Shhaibar said the figure was closer to 300, with two thirds carrying commercial goods. Israel is obliged under a US-mediated agreement to allow a ⁠minimum of ​600 trucks carrying humanitarian aid to enter Gaza each day. ​However, it says it is required to allow only 600 trucks and that commercial goods are needed to supplement aid ​supplies. ($1 = 3.1038 shekels) Reporting by Alexander Cornwell in Jerusalem and Nidal al-Mughrabi in Cairo; Editing by Alison Williams Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. , opens new tab Suggested Topics: Middle East X Facebook Linkedin Email Link Purchase Licensing Rights

Read the original article on reuters.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Reuters reports Israel's claim that commercial goods stopped entering Gaza because Gazan merchants suspended coordination over Hamas fees. It leaves out that the Gaza truckers' union head, whom Reuters quotes on truck numbers, and Gaza's media office both rejected that account and blamed Israel. A reader is left thinking only the nature of the fee is in dispute, not who stopped the goods. The headline also drops the attribution the body gives to the merchants' decision.

  1. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    Reuters reports Hamas's explanation of the fee but not that Gaza's government media office rejected COGAT's account outright. It also omits that the truckers' union head Nahed Shhaibar, whom the article quotes only on truck counts, said Israel imposed the restrictions, and that Palestinian importers denied the claim. Without this, a reader believes the merchants' decision to stop coordinating is undisputed and that Israel is merely relaying it.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  2. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “after merchants suspend coordination”

    Why this matters
    The headline attributes the halt to Israel but states "after merchants suspend coordination" as a plain event. The body only reports this as COGAT's account.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established that Gazan merchants chose to stop coordinating, and that this caused the halt.
    The context
    The body presents the merchants' decision only as what COGAT said. Other outlets report that Gaza's truckers' union head said Israel imposed the restrictions.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Reuters

  1. 20 OctIsraeli fire kills four people in Gaza, medics say3.0
  2. 19 OctIsrael to resume commercial shipments to Gaza after Hamas fee dispute3.0
  3. 19 OctWorld Food Programme cuts aid to 500,000 Palestinians in Gaza, cites funding shortages0.0
  4. 16 OctItaly names senior Israelis, Katz in probe over Gaza flotilla activists3.0
  5. 16 OctUN says Gaza malnutrition gains fragile as commercial supplies halt6.0

Everything we scored from Reuters