The New York Times, on Gaza, 9 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Navi Pillay, South African Jurist, Is Awarded the Nobel Peace Prize

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

A South African lawyer with a long record in human rights work, including leading a U.N. commission that said Israel had committed genocide, won the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday, a decision that drew Israel’s condemnation and underscored the country’s deep isolation on the world stage. The lawyer, Navanethem Pillay, known as Navi, has worked for decades on human rights issues, defending anti-apartheid activists like the future president and Nobel laureate Nelson Mandela.

Over the years, she has variously served as a top U.N. official and as a judge on the International Criminal Court and a tribunal investigating genocide in Rwanda. But it was Ms. Pillay’s work last year on a U.N. commission on Israel that made the Nobel committee’s announcement on Friday , as it put the prize in the middle of . That commission said that Israel was committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, a finding that Israel rejected.

Announcing the award, the Nobel committee did not explicitly mention Gaza, instead citing Ms. Pillay’s long career in human rights and a global shift toward “power politics” that had undermined respect for law and justice. The committee chair, Jorgen Watne Frydnes, called the award “a message to those who are attacking” international law. Ms. Pillay, 85, is “one of the most respected international jurists of our time,” the committee said, calling her “instrumental in ensuring that war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide are prosecuted.”

We are having trouble retrieving the article content. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings. Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times. Thank you for your patience while we verify access. Already a subscriber? Log in . Want all of The Times? Subscribe .

Read the original article on nytimes.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The New York Times reports Navi Pillay's Nobel Peace Prize and says plainly that the UN commission she led found Israel had committed genocide. In its own voice it calls the award an intensely political decision and places it in one of the world's most divisive issues, though the committee gave legal reasons. These are loaded words in an article that otherwise attributes and reports accurately.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “an intensely political decision”

    Why this matters
    The Times calls the Nobel committee's choice "an intensely political decision" in its own voice, with no one quoted saying so.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as settled that the prize was a political act rather than a recognition of legal work.
    The context
    The committee gave its reasons as Ms Pillay's legal career and the defence of law and justice, which the article itself reports. Other outlets reported the award as recognising her work for peace and international law. Calling it political is the outlet's verdict, not a reported fact.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “one of the world’s most divisive issues”

    Why this matters
    The Times describes the subject of the commission's genocide finding as one of the world's "most divisive issues".
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away thinking whether Israel is committing genocide in Gaza is a matter of divided opinion.
    The context
    The UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry found that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza. That is a documented finding, not one side of a divisive argument. Israel's rejection of it is a party's denial.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry found, on 16 September 2025, that Israel has committed genocide in the Gaza Strip.ohchr.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “leading a U.N. commission that said Israel had committed genocide”

    The Times names the genocide finding in its opening sentence and does not reduce it to accusations or allegations.

  • “That commission said that Israel was committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, a finding”

    The Times calls the commission's conclusion a finding and names both the perpetrator and the victims.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The New York Times

  1. 14 OctJudge Blocks Trump Administration’s Sanctions on 2 Groups Aiding the I.C.C.0.0
  2. 11 OctWringing Hope From the Rubble of Gaza3.0
  3. 9 OctIsrael Denounces the Decision to Award the Nobel Peace Prize to Navi Pillay3.0
  4. 7 OctOn This Day, Oct. 7: In 2023, Hamas-led Militants Launched Surprise Attacks on Israel3.0
  5. 6 OctWhat Went Wrong in the Effort to Free the Oct. 7 Hostages?0.0

Everything we scored from The New York Times

See how 241 outlets covered this story