Al-Monitor, on Climate, 13 November 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

COP31 talks face early friction over future of fossil fuels

No framing issues found.

ANTALYA, Turkey, Nov 13 (Reuters) - Big fossil fuel producers and consumers at the COP31 climate talks are resisting any deal that would specify firm new targets or a shift away from oil, gas and coal, observers said on Friday as the first week of talks drew to a close. That poses a challenge for summit host Turkey and lead negotiator Australia, which has another week to land the kind of ambitious agreement climate advocates say is needed to address the worsening impacts of global warming.

"Positions are still quite entrenched in terms of where they are, but that's pretty normal at this stage," said Cosima Cassel, an observer to the talks from environmental group E3G. Major oil producers such as Saudi Arabia and Russia have traditionally resisted language constraining fossil fuels, while large developing economies such as India have opposed measures they say could limit their development and energy choices, a dynamic that has compromised the outcomes of past deals.

The world’s biggest oil consumer, the United States, meanwhile, has skipped the talks for the second year in a row under President Donald Trump, who has called global warming a hoax and promoted continued use of fossil fuels. The stance is at odds with the increasing severity of global warming, scientists and campaigners say. A UN report last month found the world is on course to exceed the 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) warming limit that countries had agreed to pursue under the 2015 Paris Agreement to prevent the worst effects of climate change.

As temperatures have risen, this year has been marked by extreme heatwaves across Western Europe and a glacier collapse in Nepal that triggered a flood that killed more than 1,450 people. Thousands more are still ​missing. ELECTRIFICATION AND NO FIRM TARGETS COP31 host Turkey is striving to place a proposal to expand global electrification at the centre of an eventual deal, saying the plan will lead to emissions cuts by speeding the shift away from fossil fuel-powered cars, boilers and other equipment.

The proposal does not require the increased electricity use come from renewable sources, although some countries, including last year’s COP host Brazil, are advocating for progress on a plan to require countries to more clearly map out their transition away from fossil fuels. Katrine Petersen, another E3G observer, said whether those measures survive the talks depends on conversations in the days to come. "We've also heard quite clearly from countries like India, the G77, that they don't want any firm targets.

They don't want any kind of technology or fuel-specific language," she said. "(These are) the kind of consistent and ongoing divides that we've seen from those different parties before." Representatives from India, Saudi Arabia and Russia did not immediately comment. Diana Acconcia, head of the EU delegation, said Europe backed the electrification goal. "Electrification is, in a way, an inclusive agenda because it is non-prescriptive in a way on how the electrification is achieved," she said.

"Of course, for the European Union electrification is to be achieved by clean sources of energy." The Australian team, which is leading negotiations under a split presidency arrangement, spent the first few days of the summit gathering views on what should be included in a political text agreed by consensus that will be followed by all the negotiated technical points. Australia is taking further submissions from countries until Saturday night, with a view to formulating a draft text early next week. (Reporting by William James, Sarah McFarlane, Valerie Volcovici, Simon Jessop and Richard Valdmanis; editing by Barbara Lewis)

Read the original article on al-monitor.com (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

The article reports early resistance at the COP31 talks in Antalya to firm targets or language on moving away from fossil fuels, and Turkey's push for an electrification goal. It attributes positions to named observers and delegates, places the warming and its harms in the outlet's own voice, and notes that the electrification plan does not require renewable sources. Nothing in it misleads the reader.

What it gets right

  • “As temperatures have risen, this year has been marked by extreme heatwaves across Western Europe and a glacier collapse in Nepal that triggered a flood that killed more than 1,450 people”

    Reuters states the rise in temperatures as fact in its own voice, links the year's extremes to it, and says plainly that the flood killed people.

  • “The proposal does not require the increased electricity use come from renewable sources”

    The article tells readers the host's flagship plan carries no requirement for clean power, so readers can judge for themselves how much it would cut emissions.

  • “who has called global warming a hoax and promoted continued use of fossil fuels”

    The article reports the hoax claim as Trump's own words, not as a view to weigh. The next sentences set it against the evidence of worsening warming.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Al-Monitor

  1. 12 NovTurkey inks $5.1B in climate loans at COP31: What to know0.0
  2. 12 NovWorld leaders set out clashing priorities as COP31 turns to negotiations0.0
  3. 12 NovVenezuela tells COP31 it has a sovereign right to pump more oil0.0
  4. 11 NovIran tells COP31 it wants compensation for environmental damage from US-Israeli strikes0.0
  5. 11 NovWorld leaders speak at COP31 climate conference0.0

Everything we scored from Al-Monitor