Daily Mirror, on UK Politics, 11 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Reform's deputy chief in Scotland

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

We do not republish articles from Daily Mirror. Our findings are below, each quoting the words it is about. Read the full article on the outlet's own site.

Read the original article on mirror.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Mirror reports Thomas Kerr's remarks about Malcolm Offord's performance at First Minister's Questions, attributes his burka comments to him and gives space to a Muslim women's group that calls them misogynistic and racist. Its headline turns Kerr's hedged "might not be" into a flat "is not", and it calls a donations story "dodgy" in its own voice without saying what happened. Neither problem changes the picture of the event.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “says his boss is not 'most charismatic' leader”

    Why this matters
    The words "says his boss is not" give Kerr a flat verdict on Offord. Kerr hedged it and gave a reason.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes Kerr declared outright that his leader lacks charisma.
    The context
    Kerr said Offord "might not be the most charismatic person at FMQs, because he's still learning on the job". He added that he was still learning too, and that the party had full confidence in Offord. The headline drops the "might" and the reason.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Malcolm might not be the most charismatic person at FMQs, because he’s still learning on the job”
    • Elsewhere in the article“He said the party had “100%” confidence in Lord Offord”

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “dodgy donations scandal”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Mirror calls the donations affair "dodgy" and a "scandal". It gives no detail of what happened or who says so.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes wrongdoing over donations has been established.
    The context
    The article gives no facts about the donations, no source and no allegation. The verdict rests on the outlet's word alone.

What it gets right

  • “after saying Muslim women should not be allowed to wear niqabs and burkas publicly in a “Christian nation””

    It attributes the burka position to Kerr as his own words. It does not take on his framing in the outlet's voice.

  • “Mariam Ahmed, chief executive of Amina, the Muslim Women’s Resource Centre, said Mr Kerr’s views on the burka are misogynistic and racist.”

    It names a Muslim women's organisation and gives its response, so the people Kerr's remarks target have a voice in the piece.

  • “accusing Lord Offord and chief of staff Martyn Greene of misogynistic abuse”

    It reports a grave allegation against named people as an accusation by a named person. It does not state it as fact.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Mirror

  1. 11 Nov'No one in charge' of social care as governments branded 'asleep at the wheel'0.0
  2. 11 NovSome 13 million adults won't have enough money this Christmas to pay even essential bills0.0
  3. 10 NovEdinburgh Academy pupils suffered 'dreadful abuse' over four decades as 'complaints ignored'3.0
  4. 10 NovTeacher dies after morning assembly as school shares heartbreaking update0.0
  5. 10 NovOnlyFans livestreaming must be banned say MPs in 'e-pimps' warning3.0

Everything we scored from Daily Mirror