The Guardian, on Iran, 6 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

‘We’ve been preparing for the worst all year’: uncertainty grips Iran after Trump midterms defeat

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

J ust hours after the US midterm election results delivered a crushing defeat for the Republican party, gathered in Tehran’s Enghelab Square to set fire to a giant banner depicting Donald Trump , his vice-president, JD Vance, the US envoy Steve Witkoff and the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. Iranian officials have since issued defiant statements celebrating the Republican losses, portraying the results as a rejection of Trump’s war against Iran .

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says that the Enghelab Square rally and banner burning took place on 4 November, the annual state commemoration of the 1979 US embassy takeover (Students' Day). By opening with crowds gathering "just hours after" the results, it leads a reader to believe the rally was called in response to Trump's midterm defeat. In fact it was a scheduled anniversary event that coincided with the results.

How we know

Iran’s supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, whose father and predecessor, Ali Khamenei, , said: “The process of the US’s collapse has accelerated.” In another display, Iranian state television broadcast footage of a mock hanging of Trump in Tehran’s Tajrish Square that featured an actor wearing a mask of the US president and an orange prison uniform. Inside the country, however, some Iranians describe a sense of apprehension, pointing to the worsening economic situation and uncertainty over what Trump’s political setback could mean for their future.

For Mehnaz, a Tehran-based journalist, the mood is one of hopelessness, as people struggle to make sense of what lies ahead. “I am really fearful. Of what? I still don’t know. It’s a weird feeling,” she said. “Frankly, it’s a truly strange scenario here. People have set their sights on the US and Israel, hoping that this will bring change. I found that very strange and still do.” Some of those she has spoken to believe that Trump’s midterm loss could make another full-scale war more likely.

“Many think since this is Trump’s second term, and he therefore doesn’t need to be re-elected, he might continue the war,” she said. “But what worries me is that the [Iranian] regime has been executing people daily and this is only getting worse, with or without war.” View image in fullscreen Schoolgirls walk past a portrait of Iran’s late supreme leader Ali Khamenei during an a pro-government rally on Wednesday. Photograph: Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto/Shutterstock According to the Oslo-based NGO Iran Human Rights (IHR), Iranian authorities have executed at least 696 people this year.

Alborz, a 36-year-old writer in Tehran, said the appearance of ordinary life masked an increasingly precarious reality. “In the shops, people can still be seen browsing for clothes and other goods, just as before. Yet actual purchases have become rare, and a single T-shirt now costs what a full suit might have set you back a year ago,” he said. “Amid the banter and everyday chatter, you overhear passersby debating whether a kerosene heater is better than a wood-burning one, readying themselves, in their own way, for the possibility that the infrastructure may one day be destroyed.

“It is a resilience born of compulsion. There is nothing noble in it,” added Alborz. Unlike those who fear Trump’s defeat could bring renewed conflict, Alborz said people around him appeared to believe the likelihood of another full-scale war had diminished. “There’s a general feeling that with what happened in the US election and with Israel, the likelihood of a full-scale war resuming has decreased. Still, no one is certain.” View image in fullscreen Alborz, a 36-year-old writer in Tehran, said the appearance of ordinary life masked an increasingly precarious reality.

Photograph: Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto/Shutterstock But while Iranians who are opposed to the government differ over whether another war is likely, a common fear among those interviewed is that the repression at home will continue regardless of what happens in the US. For Noor, 24, a resident of Karaj who spent three weeks in prison after taking part in protests in January, that fear has only intensified. “They arrested me during the war, so their repression mechanism is like a well-oiled machine which won’t stop working whether it’s under clouds or bombs.”

Asked how she felt about the days ahead following Trump’s midterm defeat, she said uncertainty had become a part of life. “If someone tells you inside the country what they predict will happen next, they are lying. No one, absolutely no one, knows what will happen. We have been preparing for the worst all year. “But I know what won’t happen. This repression will not end,” said Noor. Moein, a medic in central Iran, believed the US and the west underestimated the strength of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), particularly the loyalty of its personnel and its strategic capabilities.

“Even I underestimated how powerful and strategically well placed the IRGC is,” he said. “I used to think, or at least like to think of the whole system as fossilised mullahs and corrupt, out-of-touch military men. But it’s clear to me now that they’re somewhat competent. And still loyal, despite how corrupt they can be.” View image in fullscreen Iranian government supporters rally in Enghelab Square, Tehran, after the Republican party’s defeat in the US midterm elections.

Photograph: Vahid Salemi/AP For Moein, that recognition has brought a bitter sense of contradiction: “A state capable of enduring decades of sanctions and confronting the world’s most powerful military, yet willing to turn its coercive machinery against its own population.” “It’s a shame, really. For them to fight back against the sole superpower of the world and last half a century under sanctions, only to kill young girls in the streets.”

Asked whether he expected world leaders to react to the continuing repression in Iran, he said he had fewer and fewer expectations of the European leaders. For Mehnaz, the celebrations by pro-government crowds were only getting more “outrageous” by the day. “And why won’t they celebrate? They [IRGC] have just found a hope for survival,” she said. Explore more on these topics Iran Donald Trump US midterm elections 2026 US foreign policy US-Israel war on Iran Middle East and north Africa Republicans features Share Reuse this content

Read the original article on theguardian.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Guardian reports that Ali Khamenei was killed during strikes in February but never says who carried them out, although its own tags call this the US-Israel war on Iran. It presents the Tehran rally as a crowd gathering in response to the midterm results and leaves out that it was the annual 4 November commemoration of the 1979 embassy takeover. It also calls the crowd pro-regime in its own voice, while elsewhere it uses neutral terms.

  1. Hides who did it

    Serious

    “was killed during strikes in February”

    Why this matters
    The words "was killed during strikes in February" report the killing of Iran's head of state in the passive. No one is named as having carried out the strikes.
    The impression it gives
    A reader learns that Iran's former supreme leader died in strikes but is not told by whom. The killing reads as something that happened in the course of events, not an act by named states.
    The context
    The Guardian's own tags place the story under the "US-Israel war on Iran". The article itself speaks of "Trump's war against Iran". Coverage of the same event describes the war as launched by Trump. The actor was known to the outlet and is left out of the sentence that reports the killing.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Iran's supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, whose father and predecessor, Ali Khamenei, was killed when the US and Israel struck Iran in February, said: "The process of the US's collapse has accelerated."

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “pro-regime crowds”

    Why this matters
    In its own narration The Guardian calls the Tehran crowd "pro-regime", a term that carries a verdict on Iran's government.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the outlet's own description of the government as a regime as neutral reporting.
    The context
    Elsewhere the article describes the same kind of gathering in neutral terms, as a pro-government rally and as government supporters. The loaded word in the opening line is the outlet's own choice, not a quotation.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Iranian government supporters rally in Enghelab Square”
    • Elsewhere in the article“during an a pro-government rally on Wednesday”

    Show it in the article

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says that the Enghelab Square rally and banner burning took place on 4 November, the annual state commemoration of the 1979 US embassy takeover (Students' Day). By opening with crowds gathering "just hours after" the results, it leads a reader to believe the rally was called in response to Trump's midterm defeat. In fact it was a scheduled anniversary event that coincided with the results.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Guardian

  1. 5 NovSouth Korea says it will expand naval operations closer to strait of Hormuz3.0
  2. 4 NovIran unveils ‘We will kill Trump’ banner – but US president may now be tempted to resume bombing3.0
  3. 3 NovWill Trump relaunch his war on Iran after the midterm elections?0.0
  4. 2 NovOil price falls amid hope of a breakthrough to end Iran war3.0
  5. 1 NovNegotiators ‘braced for worst’ over US-Iran talks to reopen strait of Hormuz 3.0

Everything we scored from The Guardian