The Telegraph, on Gaza, 28 September 2026

8.7out of 10Severe

Oct 7 motorcycle kidnapper blown up by IDF

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

An October 7 terrorist who abducted Israeli civilians from the Nova music festival on a motorbike has been killed in an air strike in Gaza. Saher Nidal Latfi Sakr kidnapped Noa Argamani in images that circulated widely in the aftermath of the Oct 7 attacks. Nearly three years on, the Israel Defense Forces ( IDF ) launched an operation to assassinate him inside Gaza. Israeli police released footage of the assassination, showing Sakr walking towards a house during the day.

Shortly afterwards, a car appears from the house’s driveway, and an air strike targets Sakr, who is standing next to another man. Dozens of people rush to the scene after the dust settles. The IDF said Sakr was a “terrorist operative affiliated with global jihadist organisations operating in Gaza” and that he “advanced attacks targeting Israeli civilians and IDF troops”. The IDF “eliminated” him to “remove the threat he posed”.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article places the strike only 'inside Gaza'. It never says it hit the Nuseirat refugee camp, a crowded civilian area, so a reader pictures an isolated targeted strike.

How we know

The statement was accompanied by some of the most well-known footage of kidnappings on Oct 7, showing Ms Argamani crying as she is taken away on a motorbike into Gaza . The footage of Ms Argamani circulated widely and she became a symbol of the Israeli hostages, until Israeli special forces rescued her and three other hostages in an operation in 2024. Sakr also took part in the kidnapping of Avinatan Or, who was released in a hostage deal after 738 days of captivity in Gaza.

Ms Argamani and Mr Or were a couple when they were kidnapped from Gaza but later broke up after they were reunited. The IDF told The Telegraph that Israel had killed “hundreds” of terror operatives in Gaza since the ceasefire took effect last October, including members of terror groups who posed an immediate danger and those who took part in the Oct 7 attack.

Left out here: Drops what it reported before

The Telegraph gives only the army's claim that Israel has killed 'hundreds' of terror operatives since the ceasefire. It drops its own earlier report that Israel has killed more than 1,000 further Palestinians in that period, according to the Gaza health ministry. Without it a reader believes everyone Israel has killed since the ceasefire was a fighter.

How we know

The IDF also killed Adi Adli Abd Al-Aaser, , on Sunday, saying that he had “advanced attacks” against Israeli troops and civilians and “operated to restore” Hamas’s capabilities “in systematic violation of the ceasefire”. “The terrorist was eliminated in an aerial strike in order to remove the threat. Prior to the strike, steps were taken to mitigate harm to civilians, including the use of precise munitions and aerial surveillance,” the army said.

Last week, the IDF assassinated Muhammad Hamad Muhammad Gabain, . Israel Katz, the defence minister , claimed last week that Hamas was planning to kidnap Israeli soldiers in Gaza, warning that such a move would trigger a major Israeli retaliation. He said: “If one Israeli soldier or civilian is abducted, the entire city of Gaza, with its homes and terror towers, will be evacuated south of its one million residents, as we did in Gideon’s Chariots II [military offensive] , and it will be treated in the same way Rafah, Beit Hanoun and 70 per cent of the Gaza Strip were treated, until he is returned.”

In an interview with Business Insider , which, like The Telegraph, is owned by Axel Springer, Ms Argamani said her kidnapping had made her even more of an optimist. She said: “I lost a lot of people. I saw in my own eyes hell, being in tunnels, looking in Hamas’s eyes. But I choose every day to have another part of my life, to look forward, to go to work, and not let the grief become my identity.”

Read the original article on telegraph.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

The Telegraph states the Israeli army's accusation that Sakr supplied arms to Hamas as fact in its own voice, and gives Israel's account of who it is targeting as plain fact. It labels two other men killed by Israeli occupation forces as Hamas fighters on the army's word alone. It also leaves out its own earlier report of more than 1,000 Palestinians killed since the ceasefire, and never says the strike hit the Nuseirat refugee camp.

  1. Labels people on one side's word

    Severe

    “a sniper in Hamas’s military wing”

    Why this matters
    The Telegraph calls Adi Adli Abd Al-Aaser a Hamas sniper in its own voice, before any attribution.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established that the man Israeli occupation forces killed on Sunday was a Hamas sniper.
    The context
    The only source the article gives for anything about him is the Israeli army's statement. The article offers no independent basis for the label.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the army said”

    Show it in the article

    “a commander in Hamas’s military wing, who was involved in holding a number of Israeli hostages”

    Why this matters
    The Telegraph describes Muhammad Hamad Muhammad Gabain as a Hamas commander who held hostages, with no attribution at all.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the army's description of the man it killed as verified fact.
    The context
    Other coverage shows the description comes from an announcement by the Israeli army and Shin Bet. The Telegraph drops that source.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The IOF also killed Adi Adli Abd Al-Aaser on Sunday, whom it described as a sniper in Hamas's military wing. Last week Israeli forces killed Muhammad Hamad Muhammad Gabain, whom the IOF and Shin Bet said was a Hamas commander involved in holding hostages.

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “Sakr also supplied arms to Hamas during the war.”

    Why this matters
    The Telegraph states, in its own voice and with no attribution, that Sakr supplied arms to Hamas.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as an established fact that Sakr was an arms supplier.
    The context
    This is the Israeli army's accusation. The article attributes the sentence before it to the army. Other coverage of the same killing calls it an allegation.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “Israel is targeting anyone in Gaza who took part in the Oct 7 massacre and kidnappings.”

    Why this matters
    The Telegraph gives Israel's own account of its purpose as plain fact, with no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes Israel's strikes in Gaza since the ceasefire hit people who took part in 7 October.
    The context
    The army's own statement in the next sentence says those killed include people it says 'posed an immediate danger'. The Telegraph itself reported earlier that Israel has killed more than 1,000 further Palestinians in strikes 'targeting alleged Hamas activity'.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The IOF accused Sakr of supplying arms to Hamas during the war. Israel says it is targeting those who took part in the Oct 7 attacks.

  3. Drops what it reported before

    Minor

    What is missing

    The Telegraph gives only the army's claim that Israel has killed 'hundreds' of terror operatives since the ceasefire. It drops its own earlier report that Israel has killed more than 1,000 further Palestinians in that period, according to the Gaza health ministry. Without it a reader believes everyone Israel has killed since the ceasefire was a fighter.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  4. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article places the strike only 'inside Gaza'. It never says it hit the Nuseirat refugee camp, a crowded civilian area, so a reader pictures an isolated targeted strike.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Telegraph

Everything we scored from The Telegraph