Press TV, on Iran, 27 October 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

US ‘guarantees’ proven ineffective; region must rid itself of foreign interference: Rezaei

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

Iran’s top security official says the US's "guarantees" on regional security have benefited none of the states that trusted Washington's promises

“The United States has failed to bring security to any country in the region, and the ineffectiveness of Washington’s security guarantees has become evident,” Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, Major General Mohsen Rezaei, wrote in an Arabic-language post on X on Tuesday.

“Security in West Asia must be endogenous, and any form of foreign interference must be prevented,” he added.

Iran responded to the latest round of that lasted from February 28 until April 7 with at least 100 waves of .

in countries such as Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Jordan, with Washington’s logistical facilities in Bahrain being among the facilities that suffered exceptional destruction.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says that Gulf states said Iran's strikes also hit civilian facilities and infrastructure in their countries. Without it a reader believes Iran's strikes fell only on 'hostile targets' and 'American outposts'.

How we know

American officials themselves have admitted to the debilitating extent of the damage, and now, Washington is reportedly revisiting the extent of its regional military presence.

Iran retaliation prompts US Department of War review of military bases across West Asia: Reporthttps://t.co/zxnPDnp9T5

— Press TV 🔻 (@PressTV) October 22, 2026

Rezaei’s comments came a day after he hosted a four-day security meeting between senior officials from Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan. Iranian officials hailed the development as a positive step towards regional cooperation.

Meanwhile, Alaeddin Boroujerdi, a member of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, spoke to Lebanon’s al-Mayadeen television channel, saying the three states had announced their respective intentions to send security delegations to the Iranian capital.

🔴 Statement: Quadrilateral Tehran meeting agreed to continue talks to promote regional peace and security

— Press TV 🔻 (@PressTV) October 26, 2026

Follow: https://t.co/oa9JV4iSOo pic.twitter.com/v3Kx7jjbdI

He noted that regional countries had lost confidence in Washington’s ability to guarantee their security and were reassessing their policies.

The lawmaker urged regional governments to understand that “the United States cannot help [them] provide their security.”

Read the original article on presstv.ir (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

Press TV reports Mohsen Rezaei's post on US security guarantees, but in its own voice it calls the February to April war 'unprovoked American-Israeli aggression' answered by 'decisive and successful retaliatory strikes against hostile targets'. It states sweeping damage to US bases in five countries as plain fact with no source, and it does not mention that Gulf states said Iran also hit civilian facilities and infrastructure.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “unprovoked American-Israeli aggression”

    Why this matters
    Press TV calls the US and Israeli attacks 'unprovoked American-Israeli aggression' in its own narration, with no attribution to Iranian officials.
    The impression it gives
    That it is an established fact that the war was unprovoked aggression by the US and Israel.
    The context
    This is Iran's characterisation of the war. The article gives no facts about how the fighting started that would let it state the verdict in its own voice. Other outlets describe it neutrally as 'the war that started on Feb. 28'.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Iran says it responded to US and Israeli attacks between February 28 and April 7, which it calls unprovoked aggression, with at least 100 waves of strikes across the region.

  2. Tells the event as something else

    Serious

    “decisive and successful retaliatory strikes against hostile targets across the region”

    Why this matters
    Press TV calls Iran's strikes 'decisive and successful retaliatory strikes against hostile targets', while the other side's strikes are 'aggression' in the same sentence.
    The impression it gives
    That Iran only struck legitimate hostile military targets, in justified retaliation, and with complete success.
    The context
    The Gulf states said Iran also attacked civilian facilities and infrastructure in their countries. The article offers no fact that separates 'retaliation' from 'aggression' beyond the labels themselves.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Iran carried out at least 100 waves of strikes across the region, which it describes as retaliation against hostile targets; Gulf states said civilian facilities and infrastructure were also hit.

  3. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “The reprisal either caused substantial damage or completely laid waste to American outposts”

    Why this matters
    Press TV states in its own voice, with no source, that Iran's strikes caused substantial damage to or 'completely laid waste to' US bases in five countries.
    The impression it gives
    That the scale of destruction to US bases is a verified fact.
    The context
    The article names no source for the damage assessment: no official, no report, no images. It is a claim about battle damage given as the outlet's own finding.

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Iran says its strikes caused heavy damage to US bases in Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Jordan; a report says Washington is reviewing its regional military presence.

  4. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says that Gulf states said Iran's strikes also hit civilian facilities and infrastructure in their countries. Without it a reader believes Iran's strikes fell only on 'hostile targets' and 'American outposts'.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Press TV

  1. 27 OctIran censures UN Security Council double standard on nuclear inspections6.0
  2. 27 OctPezeshkian tells Putin US actions make closer ties among sanctioned countries necessary0.0
  3. 27 OctUS aggression in Persian Gulf threatens energy security, economic growth, Pezeshkian tells GECF0.0
  4. 27 OctNo talks with US before Iran’s conditions are met: Senior lawmaker6.0
  5. 27 OctTrump peddles fresh falsehoods, claims Iran ‘started the war’ as US aggression drags on6.0

Everything we scored from Press TV