Evening Standard, on Climate, 5 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

65% of Labour voters want Government to approve Rosebank oil field – survey

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Almost two thirds of Labour supporters want to see UK ministers approve the controversial Rosebank oil and gas field, a survey suggests. Polling for Offshore Energies UK (OEUK) found 65% of those who backed Labour in the 2024 general election wanted to see the project – which is the largest undeveloped oil field in UK waters – get the green light. Despite Labour’s manifesto in 2024 under Sir Keir Starmer pledging that no new oil and gas licences would be granted, less than a fifth (17%) of the party’s voters said that Rosebank – which lies to the north west of Shetland – should be rejected.

,. (Andrew Milligan/PA) With the UK Government , now under Andy Burnham , having already approved the Jackdaw gas field off the coast of Aberdeen, the Opinium research found 68% of Labour supporters agreed this was the right decision. Almost three quarters (72%) of those who voted for the party in 2024 agreed that oil and gas are “essential for the foreseeable future”.

The polling – which questioned 2,050 adults across the UK – found that overall 55% of people were in favour of increasing the country’s domestic oil and gas production, with more than three out of five (63%) saying Rosebank should be given the go-ahead. said the survey results “offer Government an opportunity to align with public opinion and start working through the pipeline of North Sea projects that are awaiting approval”.

He added: “The public are clearly in agreement with the new Prime Minister’s ‘pragmatic’ policy on the North Sea, which will once again be tested as the final decision on Rosebank is made in the coming months.” Mr Whitehouse went on to say that “investing in North Sea energy strengthens Britain’s economy, supports UK supply chains and industrial communities, and builds our energy resilience”. PA Graphics His comments came after the UK Government introduced its Energy Independence Bill, which includes a commitment to issue no new oil and gas licences to explore new fields in the North Sea.

Rosebank had however previously been granted a licence by the Conservative government – though it was later ruled that this was unlawful leading to the project having to be considered again. Speaking about the new legislation Energy Secretary Miatta Fahnbulleh said: “Through this Bill, we will build a clean energy future which people feel in their pockets, households and communities, ensuring support reaches those who need it most.” Conservative shadow energy secretary Andrew Bowie said the new poll showed that “the message from the public could not be louder or clearer – support the extraction of North Sea oil and gas before it’s too late”.

Mr Bowie, the MP for West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine, added: “This poll shows that Labour are blatantly ignoring the needs of the public, and even their own voters. “These findings make yesterday’s move by Labour to ban any new exploration for oil and gas in the North Sea even more ludicrous, highlighting how disconnected they are from what people in the real world think. “The reality is Andy Burnham is scared to back oil and gas because he is too weak to stand up against net zero zealots, both inside and outside his party.

“If Labour continue to wage war on oil and gas then it’s inevitable businesses will cut jobs and head for the exit, never to return. “That is why Andy Burnham must stop his reckless playground politics, listen to the public, and finally approve Rosebank to ensure North Sea drilling continues for years to come.”

Read the original article on standard.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Evening Standard reports a poll on Rosebank but never tells its reader that Offshore Energies UK, which commissioned the poll and whose chief executive it quotes at length, is the North Sea oil and gas trade body. The article gives the industry and the Conservatives most of its space, while environmental campaigners get one caption line with no reason for their opposition.

  1. Hides who the source is

    Serious

    “OEUK chief executive David Whitehouse”

    Why this matters
    The words "OEUK chief executive David Whitehouse" introduce the industry's spokesman, whose claims fill three sentences, with no word on whose interests he speaks for.
    The impression it gives
    A reader hears Mr Whitehouse's claims that the public backs drilling and that North Sea investment strengthens the economy as the view of an independent expert.
    The context
    He leads the North Sea oil and gas trade body, which is pressing for Rosebank and other projects to be approved. His own words ask ministers to work through the pipeline of North Sea projects, yet the article never identifies him as a lobbyist for those projects.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“investing in North Sea energy strengthens Britain’s economy”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Polling for Offshore Energies UK (OEUK), the trade body for North Sea oil and gas companies, found 65% of those who backed Labour in 2024 wanted Rosebank approved.

  2. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “Environmental campaigners are urging ministers to reject drilling at Rosebank”

    Why this matters
    This single sentence, a photo caption, is the only place opponents of Rosebank appear. It gives them no name, no voice and no reason.
    The impression it gives
    A reader gets three sentences from the oil and gas trade body and six from the Conservative shadow energy secretary arguing for drilling, but never learns why anyone objects.
    The context
    The objection to Rosebank is about climate. Other coverage of the same poll reports that Ed Miliband called the field climate vandalism and that several Labour MPs criticised the Jackdaw approval. The article contains no word on climate or emissions.

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Evening Standard

  1. 6 NovSwinney’s response on oil and gas ‘is incoherent’0.0
  2. 6 NovSwinney’s response on oil and gas ‘is incoherent’6.0
  3. 5 NovSwinney: Scottish Government does not back ban on new oil and gas3.0
  4. 4 NovWilliam calls threat of wildfires ‘terrifying’ on visit to see Welsh fire crews6.0
  5. 4 NovMinisters urged to set target to almost treble Scotland’s onshore wind power0.0

Everything we scored from Evening Standard