Evening Standard, on Climate, 6 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Swinney’s response on oil and gas ‘is incoherent’

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

The Scottish Government’s stance on oil and gas is “incoherent”, campaigners have claimed. First Minister John Swinney told MSPs on Thursday that . Mr Swinney was accused of a “U-turn” on the issue, given Nicola Sturgeon’s administration had supported a presumption against new oil and gas, a position which has softened in the year since.

In a statement on Friday, Dr Rosie Hampton, principal policy adviser at anti-fossil fuel campaigners Uplift, said: “The First Minister’s response is incoherent. “New licensing will do nothing meaningful for Scotland’s energy security or the industry’s future. “After 50 years of drilling, the North Sea is an ageing basin in decline, with industry-supported jobs more than halving in the past decade. “Even the oil and gas lobby accepts that the ban on new exploration licences is right.

“Worse, this debate distracts from Scotland’s real energy problems. “It won’t cut a penny from people’s bills, which is what’s worrying people, while our continued reliance on fossil fuels is driving the wildfires, flooding and extreme weather we’re increasingly experiencing. “The SNP’s response to both crises is wholly inadequate. “The Scottish Government must urgently deliver a coherent transition plan – that means public investing in homegrown renewables, creating secure, long-term jobs and powering Scotland’s future – not siding with oil profiteers like some tartan Trump.”

The Scottish Government has been contacted for comment. Scottish Green energy spokesman Kristopher Leask said the First Minister’s stance was akin to “pouring petrol on a fire”. “He is betting Scotland’s energy future on a dwindling supply of North Sea oil and gas, when the ones who stand to benefit are the multinational billionaire oil and gas giants, whilst Scottish households won’t see a penny off their bills as we stay hooked on the fuels driving the climate crisis,” he said.

“Oil and gas jobs are being lost because oil and gas is running out. The Scottish Government must properly invest in the oil and gas workforce, particularly in the North East, Orkney, and Shetland. “Our economy is changing as our energy system does, and instead of properly planning for that change and giving certainty to workers long term, the Tories, Reform, Labour, and the SNP use oil and gas to score political points.” While Scottish Tory leader Russell Findlay said: “He’s not a Tartan Trump – he’s a Slippery Swinney who’s being shamelessly two-faced.

“The SNP still have a presumption against new drilling no matter what Swinney is now apparently suggesting. And he’s repeatedly refused to back our calls for new North Sea drilling. “ People across Scotland, but especially oil and gas workers, will see right through this fork-tongued First Minister.” Reform UK energy spokesman Duncan Massey said the ban would be an act of “perverse economic self-harm”, adding: “Renewables have a role to play but the hard reality is a modern economy needs cheap, abundant, reliable energy – and that means fossil fuels for years to come.

“Wind and solar cannot keep the lights on by themselves and much of the net zero programme is still pie in the sky. “Reform will maximise domestic oil and gas in the medium term, move decisively to nuclear as the long-term foundation and use renewables to fill in the gaps.” Scottish Lib Dem environment spokeswoman Sanne Djikstra-Downie said: “In an uncertain world, we need energy security and to reduce our country’s exposure to global shocks.

“Putin’s invasion of Ukraine and Trump’s reckless war with Iran has shown how dangerous and expensive it is to depend on imported fossil fuels. “It’s time to drive down demand for gas and wean ourselves off fossil fuels. “It’s why Scottish Liberal Democrats are calling for the rapid expansion of climate-friendly heating systems like heat pumps, an emergency insulation programme that makes homes warmer and cheaper to heat, and for people to get the full benefits of renewable energy.”

Read the original article on standard.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Evening Standard reports reactions from campaigners and opposition parties to John Swinney's opposition to the UK Government's ban on new North Sea exploration. It states his position without the condition he attached to it, that new developments should face climate compatibility tests. A reader therefore meets the charges of siding with oil profiteers against an unconditional pro-drilling stance that the outlet's own earlier report shows he did not take.

  1. Drops what it reported before

    Serious

    “his Government was against the UK Government’s attempts to ban all new exploration in the North Sea”

    Why this matters
    The words "was against the UK Government’s attempts to ban all new exploration" give Swinney's position as a bare rejection of the ban. The article never says what he wanted in its place.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes Swinney backs new North Sea exploration with no conditions. That is the stance the critics quoted below attack as "siding with oil profiteers" and "betting Scotland’s energy future" on oil and gas.
    The context
    The Evening Standard's own report of the same FMQs exchange the day before said Swinney opposed the ban because he believed new developments should be subject to climate compatibility tests. It also said he repeated that any approvals must be assessed for their impact on emissions. This article drops that condition. The only line for his side is that the Scottish Government "has been contacted for comment".

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    First Minister John Swinney told MSPs on Thursday that his Government did not support the UK Government's ban on new North Sea exploration, saying instead that new developments should be subject to climate compatibility tests and assessed for their impact on emissions.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Evening Standard

  1. 5 NovSwinney: Scottish Government does not back ban on new oil and gas3.0
  2. 5 Nov65% of Labour voters want Government to approve Rosebank oil field – survey6.0
  3. 5 Nov65% of Labour voters want Government to approve Rosebank oil field – survey6.0
  4. 4 NovWilliam calls threat of wildfires ‘terrifying’ on visit to see Welsh fire crews6.0
  5. 4 NovMinisters urged to set target to almost treble Scotland’s onshore wind power0.0

Everything we scored from Evening Standard