Al-Monitor, on Iran, 9 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Trump says Iran war 'highly unlikely' to resume

Findings are available in the analysis below.1 finding

US President Donald Trump cast doubt on renewed fighting with Iran, telling CNN it was "highly unlikely," ahead of a meeting with mediator Qatar's prime minister on Monday. Trump has threatened to resume strikes in recent weeks, with US media reports suggesting that hostilities could restart after last Tuesday's midterm elections. The president told CNN in an interview on Sunday that renewed fighting was "highly unlikely," but warned that his decision "depends on whether or not they sign a very strong agreement."

"I would if necessary, but we hit them really hard. I hit them so hard. You don't know how hard I hit them," he said. Trump is scheduled to meet Qatar's Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, who is also the country's foreign minister, at the White House on Monday. The meeting will be Trump's first with a foreign leader since a massive midterm loss that saw his Republican Party lose control of Congress. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi suggested on Sunday that peace talks had been paused while the political fallout of the vote was being assessed.

"For the past few days, there has been no more travel (by mediators), and the reason for this is the shock that the election results in the United States have caused to everyone," Araghchi told state television. "We now have to see how long it will take for them to digest these results, in order to determine how we are going to move forward," he added. - 'They had enough' - Trump has acknowledged that the highly unpopular war with Iran -- which began with US-Israeli strikes in late February -- was at least partially responsible for the Republicans' defeat.

Araghchi said Monday that the US president "clearly recognizes that the vast majority of Americans are disgusted with Israel." "Americans are evidently sick and tired of Israel bamboozling US administrations into Forever Wars," Araghchi said on X. "They had enough. So has our region." In Sunday's CNN interview, Trump once again suggested that the economic pressure Iran is under will force its leaders into accepting the United States' terms.

"They're a failing nation. It just came out, you saw this year, 301 percent inflation," Trump claimed. "They're withering away financially. We've hit them militarily. We could finish them off." Iran's official figures put inflation at nearly 90 percent year-on-year in September. Iranian state television said the island of Qeshm in the Strait of Hormuz was attacked overnight Sunday, hours after the official IRNA news agency reported two explosions there.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article reports that Qeshm was attacked overnight and frames the story around whether Trump will 'resume strikes'. It never says that US forces struck Qeshm Island on 2 November and struck Iran again on Friday. Without this, a reader may take 'resume' and 'renewed fighting' to mean US strikes had stopped, and has no context for a second attack on the same island. The article's line that fighting has 'largely subsided' only partly covers this.

How we know

Various regional powers, including Qatar and Pakistan, have been trying for months without success to bring a definitive halt to the war. Outright fighting has largely subsided, but Iran continues in its efforts to blockade the Strait of Hormuz, vital to global energy supplies, while the US Navy maintains its own counterblockade of Iranian ports. pnb/md/lkd/ami

Read the original article on al-monitor.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Al-Monitor reports Trump's CNN remark that renewed war with Iran is 'highly unlikely', with Araghchi's response and the Qatar mediation. It names the US and Israel as the side whose strikes began the war, and it checks Trump's inflation claim against Iran's official figure. One gap: the article does not tell readers that US forces had struck Qeshm and Iran again in the previous week. Nothing in it seriously misleads.

  1. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article reports that Qeshm was attacked overnight and frames the story around whether Trump will 'resume strikes'. It never says that US forces struck Qeshm Island on 2 November and struck Iran again on Friday. Without this, a reader may take 'resume' and 'renewed fighting' to mean US strikes had stopped, and has no context for a second attack on the same island. The article's line that fighting has 'largely subsided' only partly covers this.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “which began with US-Israeli strikes in late February”

    In its own voice, the outlet names the US and Israel as the parties whose strikes started the war, rather than saying the war simply broke out.

  • “Iran's official figures put inflation at nearly 90 percent year-on-year in September.”

    The outlet does not let Trump's '301 percent inflation' claim stand. It sets an official figure against it straight away and marks his line as 'Trump claimed'.

  • “Trump claimed”

    Trump's figure is attributed to him as a claim, not repeated as fact.

How other outlets reported it

Our analysisThe Nothing-to-Lose Attitude After the Midterms: Will Trump Escalate the War on Iran?

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Al-Monitor

  1. 9 NovTrump to meet Iran war mediator Qatar, no imminent deal seen to end the war0.0
  2. 9 NovIran defends two-day proposal for peace talks after US rejects conditions0.0
  3. 9 NovUAE's Gargash warns of prolonged regional uncertainty, says US-Iran settlement appears difficult3.0
  4. 9 NovTrump to meet Qatar's prime minister as Iran diplomacy faces hurdles3.0
  5. 8 NovUS asks Iraq to shut most Iran border crossings, Iraqi foreign minister says0.0

Everything we scored from Al-Monitor