City AM, on UK Politics, 6 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Burnham

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Andy Burnham has called on businesses to publish salaries in job adverts rather than wait for a new law to take effect which will mandate them to do so. The government said it is planning to bring forward legislation to make it compulsory for salaries to be visible on job adverts before people apply to them, making employers legally required to be transparent about pay. The government said on Thursday it “will bring forward legislation as soon as possible”.

It said the move will help tackle “a common frustration” among job-seekers, particularly those applying to a job for the first time, and may help address gender pay inequalities. “Whether you’re a young person starting out or a parent trying to support your family, you should know what a job pays before spending your time and effort applying for it. That’s why we will make it a legal requirement for all employers to say what you pay,” the prime minister said.

Burnham added: “But breaking down barriers is only one part of the job. We also need businesses to open more doors and give young people the experience and confidence to take that first step into the world of work.” The prime minister’s push for firms comes after chancellor John Healey in his Autumn Budget said the government was planning to address “calls” to introduce mandatory pay transparency in job adverts and tackle gender pay gaps at firms.

EU transparency laws a ‘patchwork’ among firms The announcement comes after British businesses continue to face headaches over complicated European Union pay transparency laws after a delayed, fragmented rollout across the bloc. The EU pay transparency directive requires member states to mandate that companies disclose starting salaries and pay ranges in job listings, and some businesses must also report gender pay gaps. The rules aim to ensure equal pay for equal work, or work of equal value, between men and women across all 27 EU countries.

As the UK is not part of the EU, this directive does not apply, but many British companies are multinational and employ staff across the continent. Amy Bird, a top partner at Magic Circle law firm Clifford Chance, previously told City AM that compliance can be difficult for businesses because implementation is “patchwork” after some have managed to roll it out, but many have either delayed or not implemented it.

Read the original article on cityam.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

City AM reports the government's plan to make employers state salaries in job adverts, attributing the plan and its aims to the government and the prime minister. Its headline and opening line say Burnham urged firms to publish pay before the law arrives, but none of the words it quotes from him say that. Otherwise the report is plainly attributed and nothing else in it misleads.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “urges firms to publish pay in job adverts ahead of new law”

    Why this matters
    The words "urges firms to publish pay in job adverts ahead of new law" present Burnham as calling on employers to act voluntarily before legislation.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes Burnham asked businesses to start publishing salaries now, without waiting for the law.
    The context
    The only words the article quotes from him announce a legal requirement and ask businesses to "open more doors" for young people. That second appeal is about experience and confidence, not about publishing pay early. Other reports of the same announcement say only that employers will be made to state pay.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “The government said on Thursday it “will bring forward legislation as soon as possible”.”

    City AM attributes the timing of the legislation to the government and quotes it, rather than stating it as settled fact.

  • “As the UK is not part of the EU, this directive does not apply”

    City AM tells readers plainly that the EU rules do not bind the UK, so the EU material is not mistaken for UK law.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from City AM

  1. 6 NovHMRC bank account raid powers spark concern over burden of proof0.0
  2. 6 NovFestus Akinbusoye: I’m more fun than Cleverly 3.0
  3. 5 NovNew Mandelson files to be released ‘by Christmas’3.0
  4. 5 NovConsultancies vulnerable as government plots non-compete axe0.0
  5. 5 NovBurnham’s Ten Year Plan: a Poundland in every postcode?0.0

Everything we scored from City AM