Ynet News (English), on UK Politics, 9 October 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

UK Green Party leader Zack Polanski suffers election defeat after

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

British Green Party leader Zack Polanski suffered overnight Thursday in an election for the parliamentary seat vacated by former Labour leader Keir Starmer. He lost to Labour candidate Sagal Abdi-Wali, . The election, held in the Holborn and St. Pancras constituency in central London, followed a highly controversial resolution adopted by the Green Party under Polanski's leadership.

by passing a resolution declaring Zionism to be racism and calling for the establishment of "a single democratic Palestinian state in all of historic Palestine with Jerusalem as its capital." While Polanski, who is Jewish, and had remained silent since its passage, Abdi-Wali sharply criticized it. "It has been brought up to me by people literally at the school gates this morning, of how like divisive they found that motion and how worried they are by it," she said.

"I think it's worrying for anyone who believes in a two-state solution." The resolution also drew criticism from lawmakers within the Green Party, numerous Jewish organizations in Britain and other political parties. Following the election results overnight Thursday, Polanski addressed the resolution for the first time but . "I grew up in a Zionist household and I grew up with the idea that that region was a land without a people and a people without a land and as I've educated myself, learned, discovered, I don't believe that's true.

And what we're seeing is an ongoing genocide and the displacement of the Palestinian people. I believe that's clearly racist." He also said he had no intention of stepping down as Green Party leader. The election was seen as a major test for Labour, which faces growing competition from the Green Party for left-wing voters. The result is considered a setback for Polanski, 43, who had pledged to transform his party into an "eco-populist" movement and draw support away from Labour — a strategy that had worked until Andy Burnham came to power.

Starmer was replaced as prime minister in July and resigned from Parliament in September after losing the support of his Labour Party following a series of defeats, policy reversals and disastrous results in May's local elections. The Greens made record gains in London in those elections, largely at Labour's expense, capitalizing on Starmer's unpopularity. However, the party has since lost ground in national polls after Burnham unveiled several policy proposals that bolstered Labour's support among left-wing voters, including a tougher stance on Israel and a more ambitious approach to relations with the European Union.

Read the original article on ynetnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

Ynet tells readers in its own voice that the Green Party 'effectively voted in favor of Israel's destruction' and calls the motion 'anti-Israel' in the headline. It prints a winning vote total that other outlets contradict, and twice tells readers Polanski took no position on the motion when the Telegraph reports he said he would have voted against it. A 33 per cent second place with a 13 per cent swing becomes a 'crushing defeat'.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “The party effectively voted in favor of Israel's destruction”

    Why this matters
    Ynet states as its own fact that Green members voted for 'Israel's destruction', with no attribution to anyone who holds that reading.
    The impression it gives
    The Green Party has formally backed destroying a state, and this is an established description of the motion.
    The context
    This is one side's interpretation. Other outlets describe the same motion as one defining or equating Zionism with racism. The quoted text calls for a single democratic state. Ynet gives the reading as fact rather than as a claim by the motion's critics.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Green Party members voted 1,022 to 813 for a motion declaring Zionism to be racism and calling for a single democratic state in historic Palestine; critics said it amounted to rejecting Israel's existence.

  2. Makes a false claim

    Serious

    “who received 12,929 votes to Polanski's 8,928”

    Why this matters
    Ynet gives Abdi-Wali 12,929 votes.
    The impression it gives
    Labour won by about 4,000 votes.
    The context
    The Mirror and the Sun both report 12,292 votes. The Telegraph gives the margin as 3,364, which matches 12,292 less 8,928. Ynet's figure inflates the winning margin by more than 600 votes.

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    He lost to Labour candidate Sagal Abdi-Wali, who received 12,292 votes to Polanski's 8,928.

  3. Makes a false claim

    Serious

    “Nevertheless, Polanski did not say whether he supported the resolution adopted by his party.”

    Why this matters
    Ynet tells readers flatly that Polanski gave no view on whether he backed the motion.
    The impression it gives
    Polanski dodged the question and still refuses to take a side.
    The context
    The Telegraph reports that on Friday Polanski said he would have voted against the motion, opposing its one-state demand while agreeing with its substance.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “again stopped short of taking a clear position on it”

    Why this matters
    Ynet uses 'again stopped short' to present Polanski's first comments as more evasion.
    The impression it gives
    Polanski had a chance to state his view and refused for a second time.
    The context
    Reported the same day, Polanski said he opposed the motion's demand for a one-state solution and would have voted against it.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Polanski said he would have voted against the motion because he opposed its call for a one-state solution, though he agreed with its substance.

  4. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “anti-Israel vote”

    Why this matters
    The headline labels the members' motion 'anti-Israel' in Ynet's own voice.
    The impression it gives
    The vote was hostility to Israel as such, and it caused the defeat.
    The context
    The motion declared Zionism to be racism. Other outlets describe it in those terms rather than with Ynet's label.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “a crushing defeat”

    Why this matters
    Ynet calls the result 'crushing' in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    The Greens collapsed at the polls.
    The context
    Polanski took 33 per cent in a long-held Labour seat, with a 13 per cent swing to the Greens. The article never gives the swing.

    Show it in the article

    “abstained from voting on the resolution”

    Why this matters
    Ynet says Polanski 'abstained', which suggests a deliberate choice not to vote.
    The impression it gives
    Polanski was present and chose to sit the vote out.
    The context
    The Telegraph reports he did not vote because he was out campaigning.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Ynet News (English)

Everything we scored from Ynet News (English)

See how 78 outlets covered this story