The Spectator opinion piece, by Andrew Gilligan, on UK Politics, 6 June 2026

8.0out of 10Severe

Did Haringey’s new Labour leader ?

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

It’s not just the Greens who attract people with shameful records of extremism. In the London borough of Haringey, Labour has appointed a former spokesman for the terrorist-sympathising group Cage as its new group leader. Cllr Ibrahim Ali, also known as Ibrahim Mohamoud, was for at least two years communications officer at Cage. The organisation became notorious after its research director, Asim Qureshi, described Britain’s Islamic State executioner and former Cage client Mohammed Emwazi – otherwise known as ‘Jihadi John’ – as a ‘beautiful young man’.

Qureshi said Emwazi’s transition to sadistic murderer was a search for ‘belonging’ triggered by Britain’s ‘alienating’ national security policy. As Qureshi put it: When are we going to finally learn that when we treat people as if they’re outsiders, they will inevitably feel like outsiders and they will look for belonging elsewhere? Our entire national security strategy for the last 13 years has only increased alienation… And when somebody [i.e., the Islamic State] is giving them a message, come, we will give you a sense of belonging, then how can we argue against that?

As Cage spokesman, the future Cllr Ali defended these comments to a parliamentary committee. Asked what he thought of them, he replied : Given Ali’s record, I think it’s fair to assume that this ‘sensitive’ job of his is not with MI5 [Emwazi’s] teacher called him… hard-working, a lovely boy. Another member of staff, a former headteacher, said he was a very hard-working, aspirational young man. He claimed Qureshi’s comments did not refer to ‘the person [Emwazi] became and the acts he committed’.

Asked why Cage had not condemned the Paris terror attacks, which killed 130 people the week before the committee hearing, Ali replied: ‘On the Friday of the attacks, we were very busy.’ Ali’s other contributions to community harmony include describing the UK as an ‘Orwellian police state’ and claiming that the Prevent counter-extremism programme fosters ‘an environment of hate’. He also amplified a claim that Prevent ‘openly targeted…normal Muslim religious practice’; praised the Cordoba Foundation, linked to the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood; and described the Muslim anti-extremism group, Quilliam, as ‘scum’.

Ali served as the vice president of student affairs for the Federation of Student Islamic Societies, which hosted numerous extremist speakers and was condemned by the government for its failure to ‘fully challenge terrorist and extremist ideology’. In this capacity, he claimed that intimidation was used to silence Muslim students, who were also being surveilled in their prayer rooms and that they felt threatened by the security services’ attempts to blackmail them into spying on their fellow students.

When he was first elected to Haringey council in May 2022, his comments about Jihadi John got Ali suspended from the Labour party. By September that year, he was back, though his statement announcing the fact contained no expression of regret or apology for his ealier words, or any sense that he’d repudiated them. He spent the next four years as a backbencher and was briefly appointed to the council’s cabinet this year until Labour lost power at last month’s local elections.

He’s now leader of the opposition, though the ruling Greens are one seat short of a majority, meaning that a return to power is not completely out of the question. One other fascinating thing about Cllr Ali is that he declares he has another job – but withholds all details about what it is from his official council declaration of interest on the grounds that it’s ‘sensitive’. It’s quite common and understandable for councillors to withhold their home addresses from such declarations – but it surely defeats the entire object of registers of interest if they’re allowed not to tell us what other activities they carry out for money.

Given Ali’s record, I think it’s fair to assume that . The Spectator contacted Cllr Ali to ask whether he had changed his views since working for Cage or whether he would now apologise for them. We have received no reply.

Read the original article on spectator.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Andrew Gilligan's column suggests, with nothing behind it, that Cllr Ibrahim Ali may secretly work for Cage or another 'Islamist organisation'. Its only basis is that Ali lists a second job as 'sensitive'. Its question headline also goes slightly beyond the body, which shows Ali defending a colleague's comments rather than Emwazi's crimes.

NewsCord staff selected this article for review and pointed the model at passages to examine. Every finding quotes the article.

Opinion piece: read for false claims of fact and for fairness to the people it names, not for its opinions.

  1. Smears a named person

    Severe

    “Could he still be working for Cage, or another Islamist organisation, in some capacity?”

    Why this matters
    The question “Could he still be working for Cage, or another Islamist organisation” suggests that a named councillor secretly works for an extremist body.
    The impression it gives
    That Ali’s undeclared job is probably with Cage or a similar extremist group.
    The context
    The only fact the article gives is that Ali lists another job as ‘sensitive’ on his declaration of interest. Nothing in the piece links that job to Cage or to any organisation at all. The Spectator also concedes that councillors commonly withhold some details from these registers.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“withholds all details about what it is”
    • Elsewhere in the article“It’s quite common and understandable for councillors to withhold”

    Show it in the article

    “this ‘sensitive’ job of his is not with, for instance, MI5”

    Why this matters
    The sarcastic line about MI5 tells the reader that Ali’s record makes any innocent explanation of the job laughable. It sets up the insinuation in the next sentence.
    The impression it gives
    That Ali’s private employment is suspect because of who he is and what he has said.
    The context
    The article has no information about the job beyond the word ‘sensitive’. The suspicion rests only on Ali’s past views, and The Spectator reports no reply from him, not a refusal to explain.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“We have received no reply.”

    Show it in the article

  2. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “once defend Jihadi John”

    Why this matters
    The headline asks whether Ali defended “Jihadi John”, the Islamic State executioner himself.
    The impression it gives
    That Ali spoke up for Emwazi or his killings.
    The context
    The body says Ali defended Asim Qureshi’s comments to a committee. It reports him saying those comments did not refer to the person Emwazi became or his acts. The ‘lovely boy’ and ‘hard-working’ words were attributed to Emwazi’s teacher and a former headteacher, not to Ali.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the future Cllr Ali defended these comments to a parliamentary committee”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Qureshi’s comments did not refer to”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Another member of staff, a former headteacher, said”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Spectator

  1. 26 AugMiddle East Eye seems to get stupider and stupider6.0
  2. 25 AugFarah Ahmed: study engineering ‘to produce weaponry for Jihad’3.0
  3. 18 AugCambridge University-linked project erases Israel6.0
  4. 15 AugWhy is Cambridge platforming Islamic creationism?3.0
  5. 11 AugMeet Farah Ahmed, Jason Arday’s colleague3.0

Everything we scored from The Spectator