Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on Gaza, 26 October 2026

9.4out of 10Severe

UN commission accuses Israel of 'extermination'; Israel slams 'misinformation campaign'

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.7 findings

A United Nations Human Rights Council-appointed commission on Monday leveled new accusations against Israel, alleging that the Jewish state has committed crimes against humanity, including "extermination," , while . The Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel claimed that Israeli military operations in Judea and Samaria since Hamas' October 7, 2023, massacre constituted a "widespread and systematic attack" against Palestinian Arab civilians.

The commission accused Israeli authorities and security forces of extermination, torture, rape, other forms of sexual violence, and persecution based on nationality, race, and ethnicity. It also alleged that Israeli authorities had deliberately incorporated into a broader policy of displacing Palestinian Arabs. The report further sought to link Israel's current security policies to the events surrounding its establishment in 1948, alleging that successive Israeli governments had pursued a continuing policy of territorial expansion and Palestinian Arab displacement.

The Israeli Mission to the United Nations in Geneva strongly rejected the accusations, describing the report as part of a campaign to undermine Israel's legitimacy and distort the history of the Jewish state's establishment. "The latest report of the Commission of Inquiry is yet another manifestation of its misinformation campaign to demonize the State of Israel and portray its very existence as criminal," the mission stated. "Reflecting the institutional bias of this mechanism, the report fundamentally distorts history, recasting Israel's defensive war for survival following the invasion by five Arab armies in May 1948 as a colonial 'expulsion' policy," the statement continued.

Israeli Ambassador to the UN in Geneva Daniel Meron stated: "The attempt to destroy the Jewish state did not end in 1948. It continues today through efforts by actors such as the UN Commission of Inquiry to undermine Israel's legitimacy and deny its fundamental right to exist and defend itself." The Israeli mission also accused the commission of squandering substantial UN resources on misinformation, historical revisionism, and extremist ideologies.

"The international community must reject these distortions, repudiate the Commission's findings and demand its immediate dissolution," the mission concluded. The 19-page report was released on Monday, one day before Israel's general election. The three-member investigative commission was established by the UN Human Rights Council in 2021 and does not speak on behalf of the United Nations itself. According to the report, the commission investigated seven cases and documented six additional cases involving Palestinian Arabs killed or injured between November 2023 and June 2026.

The investigators claimed that Israeli security personnel had intentionally killed civilians who posed no immediate threat. The commission also challenged Israeli military explanations for several incidents and alleged that security forces were operating under increasingly permissive rules of engagement. The report specifically criticized Operation Iron Wall, , claiming that military activity in Jenin, Tulkarm, and other areas of northern Samaria had resulted in widespread destruction and the displacement of tens of thousands of Palestinian Arabs.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says the commission found that Israeli forces deliberately killed and maimed children in the West Bank, amounting to age-based persecution. A reader does not learn that children were among those the commission found were intentionally targeted.

How we know

The commission claimed that Israeli military operations had shifted toward the extensive destruction of housing and infrastructure in . and restore operational freedom for Israeli forces. Turning to Gaza, .

The commission first made that determination in September 2025. Its latest report alleged that Israeli military operations following the October 2025 ceasefire demonstrated the continuation of what it described as genocidal acts. The investigators examined Israeli airstrikes carried out in October 2025, as well as separating areas under Israeli military control from other parts of Gaza.

and attributed additional military action to ceasefire violations. Nevertheless, the commission alleged that the strikes and the expansion of Israeli-controlled territory demonstrated a continuing intention to destroy Palestinian Arab communities. The commission also renewed allegations of sexual violence and mistreatment involving Palestinian Arab detainees and participants in the 2025 Global Sumud Flotilla.

It called on Israel to end in Gaza, withdraw from Palestinian territories, remove Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria, and provide compensation to Palestinian Arabs harmed during military operations. The commission additionally urged countries to investigate and prosecute suspected Israeli violations of international law and called on the International Criminal Court prosecutor to examine the allegations in connection with existing and potential arrest warrants.

The report also examined the conduct of Palestinian Authority security forces, finding that the PA had violated the rights of Palestinian Arabs through killings, excessive force, arbitrary detention, and the suppression of political dissent. According to the commission, Palestinian security forces killed at least 14 Palestinian Arabs, including two minors, between October 2023 and October 2025. The investigators cited Operation Protect the Homeland, which Palestinian Authority security forces launched against armed groups in Jenin in December 2024, and documented cases in which security personnel allegedly killed or injured individuals who posed no immediate threat.

The report also examined the killing of a female journalism student in Jenin in December 2024 who had reportedly published criticism of Palestinian security forces before her death. The commission accused the Palestinian Authority of suppressing journalists, human rights activists, and political opponents while failing to properly investigate killings attributed to its security personnel. It concluded that the PA had violated the right to life and personal security and had failed to provide effective remedies to victims and their families.

The commission called on the Palestinian Authority to conduct independent investigations, prosecute those responsible for violations, and stop targeting journalists and human rights defenders. The commission is scheduled to present its report to the UN General Assembly in New York on Monday.

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (7)

Israel National News reports the UN Commission of Inquiry's new findings but writes the commission's 2025 genocide finding, part of the documented record, as an accusation Israel rejects. It turns killings at Gaza's Yellow Line into 'incidents', uses settler names for the occupied West Bank and its settlements, and labels an IOF raid a 'counterterrorism operation' in its own voice.

  1. Hedges the documented record

    Severe

    “the commission repeated its earlier accusation that Israel had committed genocide during the war triggered by Hamas' October 7 attack, an allegation Israel has consistently rejected”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls the commission's September 2025 genocide finding an 'accusation' and an 'allegation', then attaches Israel's denial to it in the same breath.
    The impression it gives
    That whether Israel committed genocide in Gaza is an open charge, set evenly against Israel's rejection.
    The context
    The UN Commission of Inquiry found on 16 September 2025 that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza. The article itself calls this a 'determination' one sentence later. A documented finding is not one side of a dispute.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry found, on 16 September 2025, that Israel has committed genocide in the Gaza Strip.ohchr.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Elsewhere in the article“The commission first made that determination in September 2025.”

    Show it in the article

    “what it characterized as genocide”

    Why this matters
    The phrase 'what it characterized as' turns the genocide in Gaza into the commission's own description rather than a finding.
    The impression it gives
    That 'genocide' is a contested label one body chose to use.
    The context
    The genocide finding stands on the UN commission's 2025 report, and the ICJ has issued provisional measures in the genocide case against Israel.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry found, on 16 September 2025, that Israel has committed genocide in the Gaza Strip.ohchr.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice has issued provisional measures in the genocide case against Israel; this is a documented finding, not an allegation awaiting a reporter's verdict.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    “renewing its allegations of genocide in the Gaza Strip”

    Why this matters
    The opening sentence calls the commission's restated genocide finding 'allegations'.
    The impression it gives
    From the first line, that genocide in Gaza is unproven.
    The context
    The commission had already determined in September 2025 that Israel committed genocide. The new report restates a finding, not an allegation.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Turning to Gaza, the commission, which found in September 2025 that Israel has committed genocide, said Israel has continued to commit genocidal acts since the October 2025 ceasefire. Israel rejects the finding.

  2. Writes the death out

    Severe

    “incidents involving Palestinian Arabs approaching or crossing the Yellow Line”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls what the commission investigated at the Yellow Line 'incidents'. It names no one who fired and no one who was killed.
    The impression it gives
    That the commission looked at vague events near a boundary line, with no clear harm and no clear actor.
    The context
    The commission found that Israeli forces are killing and injuring Palestinian civilians, including children, who approach or cross the Yellow Line.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The investigators examined Israeli airstrikes in October 2025 and the killing and wounding by Israeli forces of Palestinian civilians, including children, who approached or crossed the Yellow Line.

  3. Uses the occupation's words

    Serious

    “in Judea and Samaria”

    Why this matters
    The outlet uses the settler name 'Judea and Samaria' for the occupied West Bank in its own voice, and keeps using it throughout the article.
    The impression it gives
    That the territory where the commission found extermination is part of Israel's own land, not occupied territory.
    The context
    The commission's report is about the occupied West Bank. The ICJ holds Israel's occupation of it unlawful.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “violence by Jewish residents of Judea and Samaria”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls settlers 'Jewish residents', which hides that they live in illegal settlements on occupied land.
    The impression it gives
    That the commission blamed ordinary local residents for violence.
    The context
    The commission described military operations reinforced by sustained settler violence. The settlements are illegal under international law.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    It called on Israel to end what it found to be genocide in Gaza, withdraw from the occupied Palestinian territories, evacuate settlements in the occupied West Bank, and compensate Palestinians harmed.

  4. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “the IDF counterterrorism operation launched in January 2025”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls Operation Iron Wall a 'counterterrorism operation' in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    That the raids on Jenin and Tulkarm were established to be against terrorism, while the commission's account of destruction and displacement is only a claim.
    The context
    'Counterterrorism' is the IOF's own description. The article itself attributes it to the army two sentences later. The commission found the operations caused widespread destruction and displaced tens of thousands of Palestinians.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the IDF had explained the operations as efforts to dismantle terrorist infrastructure”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The report specifically criticised Operation Iron Wall, the Israeli military operation launched in January 2025, which the army describes as counterterrorism, saying it caused widespread destruction in Jenin and Tulkarm and displaced tens of thousands of Palestinians.

  5. Erases a people's national identity

    Minor

    “Arab refugee camps”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls the West Bank refugee camps 'Arab refugee camps', dropping the word Palestinian.
    The impression it gives
    That the camps hold an undefined Arab population rather than Palestinian refugees.
    The context
    The commission's findings concern Palestinians in the occupied West Bank. Elsewhere the article uses 'Palestinian Arabs' where other outlets write simply 'Palestinians'.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  6. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “The report acknowledged that the IDF had explained the operations as efforts to dismantle terrorist infrastructure”

    Why this matters
    The outlet says the report 'acknowledged' the army's 'explanation', while the commission's own findings are introduced throughout with 'claimed' and 'alleged'.
    The impression it gives
    That the commission conceded the army's account had merit.
    The context
    The commission recorded the army's position and rejected it. It challenged Israeli military explanations for several incidents.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The commission also challenged Israeli military explanations for several incidents”

    Show it in the article

    “The report acknowledged that Israel had identified sites struck during the October operations as terrorist targets”

    Why this matters
    The same verb, 'acknowledged', is used for Gaza, so Israel's targeting claim reads as something the commission granted.
    The impression it gives
    That the commission accepted the October strikes hit terrorist targets.
    The context
    The commission found Israeli forces kept using heavy munitions, drones and sniper fire in densely populated areas during the ceasefire.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  7. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says the commission found that Israeli forces deliberately killed and maimed children in the West Bank, amounting to age-based persecution. A reader does not learn that children were among those the commission found were intentionally targeted.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

  1. 28 OctTerrorist who held hostage Nimrod Cohen eliminated9.1
  2. 26 OctIDF eliminates four Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists in Gaza9.1
  3. 26 OctFootage from Khan Yunis: IDF strikes terrorists emerging from tunnel8.7
  4. 26 OctIDF eliminates two senior Hamas commanders in Gaza strikes9.1
  5. 25 OctIDF eliminates two terrorists who transferred millions to Hamas9.4

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

See how 33 outlets covered this story