Reuters, on Lebanon, 15 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Hezbollah says it owned confiscated explosives, meant to attack Israel

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Item 1 of 2 Hezbollah members take part in a military exercise during a media tour organized for the occasion of Resistance and Liberation Day, in Aaramta, Lebanon. REUTERS/Aziz Taher/File photo [1/2] Hezbollah members take part in a military exercise during a media tour organized for the occasion of Resistance and Liberation Day, in Aaramta, Lebanon. REUTERS/Aziz Taher/File photo Purchase Licensing Rights , opens new tab Summary Lebanon's government has sought to control weapons flow Hezbollah military activities banned after rockets hit Israel Iran-backed group asks for explosives to be returned BEIRUT, Oct 15 (Reuters) - A Hezbollah lawmaker said on Thursday that hundreds of kilograms of explosives seized ​last week by Lebanese security forces belonged to his group, as tensions persist over the government's push to disarm the ‌.

Lebanese authorities stopped the explosives-laden vehicle at a checkpoint in the eastern Bekaa region last week and arrested two people in the car. Sign up here. At the time, authorities did not say who the vehicle belonged to, prompting widespread worry in Lebanon that the explosives were intended for car bomb assassinations or other destabilising attacks inside ​the country. Speaking to reporters at the Lebanese parliament on Thursday, lawmaker Hassan Fadlallah said Hezbollah had intended to use the explosives ​against Israel, whose troops are occupying swathes of Lebanese territory seized in this year's war.

PRESIDENT CALLS FOR ISRAELI COMPLIANCE A ⁠Hezbollah official and a Lebanese security source told Reuters that the explosives seized in the car last week were intended to be used ​in explosive drones targeting Israeli troops. Fadlallah said Hezbollah had immediately contacted security agencies to clarify that it owned the vehicle and the cargo, and ​to demand the materials be returned and those detained be released. Fadlallah's acknowledgment reflects Hezbollah's efforts to continue transporting weapons across Lebanon despite the government's vow to bring all arms in the country under state control.

On March 2 , the government specifically banned Hezbollah's military activities, hours after the movement , ​pulling Lebanon into the regional war begun by US and Israeli strikes on Iran. The government decision was an attempt to reverse the relative ​freedom Hezbollah had enjoyed for years in transporting military equipment across Lebanon. The group's main arms supply route through Syria was severed when its ally, then-president Bashar ‌al-Assad, was ⁠ousted in late 2024.

The new Syrian authorities have regularly announced seizures of weapons along their border with Lebanon that they say are intended for Hezbollah. Throughout 2025, Lebanese troops seized and destroyed Hezbollah weapons depots in southern Lebanon in line with the government's plan to exert state control over all weapons, but that roadmap was put on pause when the new war erupted. President Joseph Aoun told US Secretary of State Marco Rubio ​in a telephone call on Thursday ​that the Lebanese army and ⁠security forces were fully carrying out decisions to prevent armed displays, confiscate weapons and ammunition, and combat smuggling, the presidency said.

Aoun said recent measures taken by the security services fell within that effort, and said judicial ​authorities would pursue all cases referred to them, with no leniency for offenders. Under a deal reached through ​US-brokered talks between ⁠Lebanon and Israel this year, Beirut has vowed to disarm Hezbollah, which would in turn lead to Israeli troops gradually withdrawing from Lebanon. But Hezbollah has refused to disarm as long as Israeli forces remain on Lebanese land and Israel has continued carrying out strikes across southern Lebanon.

Israel says its ⁠actions in ​the area are aimed against Hezbollah. Aoun asked Rubio to pressure Israel to halt what ​the presidency described as attacks on southern Lebanese towns and villages, comply with the framework agreement, stop bulldozing work and allow farmers to reach their land without being targeted, the ​presidency said. Adds phone call between Aoun and Rubio in paragraphs 12,13,16 Reporting by Laila Bassam, Jana Choukeir and Tala Ramadan; Writing by Jana Choukeir and Maya Gebeily; Editing by Emelia Sithole-Matarise and Andrew Heavens Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. , opens new tab Suggested Topics: Middle East X Facebook Linkedin Email Link Purchase Licensing Rights

Read the original article on reuters.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Reuters reports, with clear attribution, a Hezbollah lawmaker's statement that seized explosives belonged to the group and were meant for use against Israeli troops occupying Lebanese land. It names Israel's occupation and strikes plainly. In its own voice it calls Hezbollah 'Iran-backed' with no source, defining a Lebanese party by Iran.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Iran-backed movement”

    Why this matters
    Reuters attaches "Iran-backed" to Hezbollah in its own voice as the group's defining label, and repeats it in the summary line "Iran-backed group".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes Hezbollah chiefly as a foreign proxy rather than a Lebanese party with a lawmaker in parliament.
    The context
    The article itself quotes a Hezbollah lawmaker speaking at the Lebanese parliament. The label is the outlet's choice and is not attributed to any source.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Speaking to reporters at the Lebanese parliament”

    Show it in the article

    “launched rockets at Israel to back up Tehran”

    Why this matters
    Reuters states Hezbollah's motive, "to back up Tehran", as fact in its own voice with no source.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as settled that Hezbollah acted on Iran's behalf, which casts the Lebanese party as Iran's instrument.
    The context
    No one in the article is cited for this motive. It is the outlet's own characterisation.

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “whose troops are occupying swathes of Lebanese territory”

    Reuters states Israel's occupation of Lebanese land plainly, in its own voice.

  • “Israel has continued carrying out strikes across southern Lebanon”

    It names Israel as the actor of the strikes instead of writing them without a subject.

  • “the regional war begun by US and Israeli strikes on Iran”

    It names who started the regional war rather than leaving Hezbollah's rockets as the first act.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Reuters

  1. 17 OctLebanon says military delegation will press for halt to Israeli attacks at US talks3.0
  2. 15 OctRubio urges Lebanon to not return confiscated explosives to Hezbollah, US official says3.0
  3. 14 OctUN peacekeeping chief says talks on future of Lebanon mission must begin soon3.0
  4. 13 OctHezbollah outlines financial aid plan for Lebanese with destroyed homes3.0
  5. 8 OctDrones, explosions and soldiers in bulldozers: surrounded by Israelis in Lebanon's 'model town'3.0

Everything we scored from Reuters