LBC, on UK Politics, 9 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Goods made using slave labour in new crackdown

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Businesses which trade goods made with slave labour will have to withdraw them from sale, the Government has said, revealing it will change the law to enforce the new ban. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said he plans to introduce new legislation to introduce mandatory human rights due diligence for companies, which will require them to remove products made with forced labour and modern slavery. He outlined the move in a letter to the Commons Business, Innovation, Science and Trade (BIST) Committee, which has been calling for new business safeguards against modern slavery for nearly two years.

The new duty will apply to British businesses with a global turnover of more than £350 million, and non-UK businesses with a UK-generated turnover of more than £350 million. Those who do not comply with the new duty may be forced to withdraw products from sale which have come from forced labour or modern slavery, Mr Reynolds said. “We believe this package of measures strikes the right balance: safeguarding the competitiveness of responsible businesses, strengthening confidence in UK markets and helping to ensure that goods linked to forced labour do not reach UK consumers,” the Business Secretary said in his letter to the BIST committee.

The group of cross-party MPs has been calling for modern slavery protections to be strengthened since it heard evidence from Chinese-owned clothing company Shein in January 2025. In that session, the firm repeatedly declined to confirm whether its products contained cotton sourced from China, including Xinjiang, where it is believed that the Uighur minority are subject to forced labour. 'Outrage' Liam Byrne, chair of the BIST committee, said: “For too long, it has been an outrage that our great country which led the abolition of slavery has had weaker defences against forced labour imports than either the EU or the United States.

“Now, almost two years on from our hearings with Shein, when the firm repeatedly refused to confirm in Parliament whether its products contained cotton from China, including Xinjiang, we have a clear commitment to change the law.” Mr Byrne welcomed the Government’s commitment, adding: “Now we need a clear timetable, a regulator with the resources to enforce the rules, and meaningful consequences for companies that fail to comply.”

Read the original article on lbc.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

LBC reports the Business Secretary's plan to make large companies remove goods made with forced labour, and it attributes the plan to him and to his letter throughout the body. The headline states the withdrawal of goods as a settled outcome, while the body describes a planned law with no timetable and a penalty that companies "may" face. Nothing else in the article misleads.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “will be be withdrawn from sale”

    Why this matters
    The headline says goods made using slave labour "will be be withdrawn from sale", with no attribution to the Government and no sign that this depends on a law not yet introduced.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it that a ban is in force or certain, and that such goods will come off the shelves.
    The context
    The body reports a plan. Reynolds "plans to introduce new legislation", firms that do not comply "may be forced to withdraw products from sale", and the committee chair says a timetable is still needed.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“he plans to introduce new legislation”
    • Elsewhere in the article“may be forced to withdraw products from sale”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Now we need a clear timetable”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said he plans to introduce new legislation”

    The article names the minister behind the plan and reports it as his stated plan, not as an accomplished fact.

  • “British businesses with a global turnover of more than £350 million, and non-UK businesses with a UK-generated turnover of more than £350 million”

    It gives the threshold and its base, so readers can see the duty covers only large firms.

  • “Now we need a clear timetable, a regulator with the resources to enforce the rules, and meaningful consequences for companies that fail to comply.”

    It ends on the committee chair's point that enforcement and timing are still open, which tells readers the plan is not yet law.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from LBC

  1. 9 NovGen Zs ‘buoyed’ by Budget but older investors feeling worse off, survey finds3.0
  2. 8 NovLabour grants energy firms access to customer tax records, as party accused of 'big brother' tactics6.0
  3. 8 NovSchools to stop teaching GCSEs before Year 10 in major curriculum overhaul3.0
  4. 8 NovLisa Nandy rejects 'really crass' accusations she insulted veterans with Remembrance Sunday ‘EU pitch’3.0
  5. 8 NovBurnham vows to tackle veteran homelessness0.0

Everything we scored from LBC