‘Get Focused on London’: How Iran’s Agents Attacked European Targets

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings See them marked on nytimes.com

As the U.S.-Israel war in Iran raged earlier this year, a man linked to Iranian criminal networks perched in front of a computer, on a video call with a teenager in London. The man wanted to make sure the teen, who was moments away from setting fire to a synagogue, carried out his plans. “Light it up like a Christman tree,” the man, an Iraqi named Mohammad Ali al-Hassani, urged the 17-year-old, according to U.S. prosecutors. The teen climbed over a wall and tossed a bomb through a broken window.

“J’s mic is muted,” read the text on Mr. al-Hassani’s computer screen. The synagogue arson in April was a small, violent part of Iran’s efforts to force an end to the bombing campaign that was pummeling the country, according to American investigators. The attack was described in a federal indictment filed in New York this week. It revealed extensive new details about a wave of violence against Jewish institutions in Europe and U.S. targets, including a British air base used by American bombers.

Prosecutors hold Iran’s agents responsible for the assaults. Within days of the war starting, Mr. al-Hassani and at least two associates, including an operative for Iran’s powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, began plotting the attacks in Europe, prosecutors said. The men talked about procuring drones and missiles from contacts in Iran. They pored over a map of London, with one saying they should “get focused” on targeting the British capital.

Soon after, attacks hit temples and other Jewish sites in London. In the fight against much stronger conventional forces, Iran has found ways to impose costs on its adversaries without inviting a full military response. One major aspect of Iran’s strategy is its embrace of small-time criminals to conduct low-cost assaults against vulnerable targets that are part of everyday life. We are having trouble retrieving the article content. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times. Thank you for your patience while we verify access. Already a subscriber? Log in . Want all of The Times? Subscribe .

Read the original article on nytimes.com

What we found (2)

The New York Times reports a U.S. federal indictment accusing a man tied to Iran of directing a teenager to set fire to a London synagogue, and other attacks in Europe. The body credits these accusations to prosecutors, but the headline drops that attribution and states as fact that Iran's agents carried out the attacks. In its own voice the article also links later attacks on Jewish sites to the plot and describes Iran's strategy, both of which rest only on the prosecution's case.

Headline goes beyond the article
Serious
“How Iran’s Agents Attacked European Targets”
Why this matters
The headline says as plain fact that Iran's agents attacked European targets. It names no prosecutor, indictment or allegation.
The impression it gives
A reader takes it as established that Iranian agents carried out the attacks.
The context
The body rests the link on U.S. prosecutors and investigators and a newly filed indictment. No court has ruled on these accusations, and the article reports no other source for them.
How we know
- Elsewhere in the article“Prosecutors hold Iran’s agents responsible for the assaults.”
- Elsewhere in the article“according to American investigators”
- Elsewhere in the article“described in a federal indictment filed in New York this week”
Show it in the article
Written straight
U.S. Prosecutors Accuse Iran's Agents of Attacks on European Targets
States one side's claim as fact
Serious
“Soon after, attacks hit temples and other Jewish sites in London.”
Why this matters
The Times places the attacks straight after the men's alleged planning, in its own voice and with no attribution, so the order of sentences does the work of proving cause.
The impression it gives
A reader believes the plotters described in S10 to S12 are shown to be behind the London attacks.
The context
That link is the prosecution's case in an indictment. The surrounding sentences attribute the plotting to what prosecutors said, but this sentence drops that.
How we know
- Elsewhere in the article“began plotting the attacks in Europe, prosecutors said”
- Elsewhere in the article“Prosecutors hold Iran’s agents responsible”
Show it in the article
“Iran has found ways to impose costs on its adversaries without inviting a full military response”
Why this matters
The Times states in its own voice what Iran's government has done and why. It gives no source for the claim.
The impression it gives
A reader takes Iran's government's deliberate use of these attacks as an established finding of the newspaper.
The context
The only basis in the article is the accusation by U.S. prosecutors and investigators in an indictment filed that week.
How we know
- Elsewhere in the article“according to American investigators”
- Elsewhere in the article“The attack was described in a federal indictment”
Show it in the article
“One major aspect of Iran’s strategy is its embrace of small-time criminals to conduct low-cost assaults against vulnerable targets that are part of everyday life”
Why this matters
The Times turns a prosecution allegation into a settled account of a state strategy, calling it a 'major aspect' in its own voice.
The impression it gives
A reader believes it is proven that Iran's government deliberately recruits criminals to attack everyday targets.
The context
The article's own sourcing for this is prosecutors' accusations in an indictment, which it attributes elsewhere but not here.
How we know
- Elsewhere in the article“Prosecutors hold Iran’s agents responsible for the assaults.”
Show it in the article
Written straight
U.S. prosecutors allege that Iran's government has used small-time criminals to carry out low-cost attacks, and that the London attacks on Jewish sites followed the men's planning.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The New York Times

Everything we scored from The New York Times

‘Get Focused on London’: How Iran’s Agents Attacked European Targets

Headline goes beyond the article

States one side's claim as fact

More from The New York Times