Ynet News (English), on Gaza, 6 November 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

Palestinians push as EU struggles to agree

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

As Israel navigates the process of forming its next government, the Palestinians are preparing to advance at the United Nations aimed at challenging the country's international standing. The proposals are expected to come before the UN General Assembly for approval throughout November. The Palestinian delegation is seeking to advance resolutions critical of Israel, with particular emphasis on the consequences of the war that began on October 7, 2023.

Among the proposals are resolutions addressing assistance to Palestinian refugees, protection of their property and livelihoods, and condemnation of Israeli settlements in and the Syrian Golan Heights. The resolutions are also expected to include a formal condemnation of plans to advance construction tenders in the E1 area, a strategically sensitive corridor east of Jerusalem in the West Bank.

In addition, the Palestinians are seeking, for the first time, a formal UN declaration refusing to recognize , alongside a demand for a policy of "differentiation" . The draft resolutions are currently the subject of negotiations over their final wording between the Palestinian delegation and European Union member states. Particularly intensive talks took place this week with EU representatives.

Despite significant Palestinian pressure, a week of internal consultations and marathon diplomatic discussions among the bloc's 27 member states failed to produce a consensus on any of the proposed resolutions. Nevertheless, diplomatic officials believe the Palestinians are unlikely to abandon the initiative. Despite the differences between EU member states and the lack of broad European agreement, the Palestinian delegation may still decide to bring the resolutions to a vote without a consensus or widespread European backing.

Meanwhile, Israel's UN mission and Ambassador Danny Danon are working behind the scenes to soften the language of the resolutions and reduce the number of countries expected to support them. "," Danon said. "The Israeli delegation is working closely with our allies to confront this diplomatic attack."

Read the original article on ynetnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

Ynet calls Palestinian UN resolutions on refugees and illegal settlements "anti-Israel" in its own voice. It reduces the occupation to territories merely "described as occupied" and writes the West Bank as part of Israel, though the ICJ has held the occupation unlawful and the settlements illegal. Only Israel's ambassador is quoted, so his account that this is a "diplomatic attack" stands alone.

  1. Hedges the documented record

    Serious

    “territories described as occupied, including East Jerusalem”

    Why this matters
    The words "described as occupied" turn the occupation of East Jerusalem into a description someone else offers, not a fact.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it that whether East Jerusalem is occupied is a matter of opinion, and that condemning settlements there is a political stance.
    The context
    The ICJ's July 2024 advisory opinion holds Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful and the settlements illegal. The resolutions turn on exactly this point, and the article never says the settlements are illegal under international law.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe ICJ's July 2024 advisory opinion holds Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful and the settlements illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “illegal” and “unlawful”.

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Among the proposals are resolutions condemning Israeli settlements in the occupied territories, including East Jerusalem, which the ICJ held in 2024 to be illegal under international law.

  2. Uses the occupation's words

    Serious

    “between the West Bank and the rest of Israel”

    Why this matters
    The words "the rest of Israel" place the West Bank inside Israel in the outlet's own voice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the West Bank to be Israeli territory, and the Palestinian demand for differentiation to be a demand to split up Israel.
    The context
    The West Bank is occupied territory. The ICJ's 2024 advisory opinion holds the occupation unlawful. The article itself places E1 "east of Jerusalem in the West Bank" and speaks of territories under occupation, yet here it folds the West Bank into Israel.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe ICJ's July 2024 advisory opinion holds Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful and the settlements illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Elsewhere in the article“a strategically sensitive corridor east of Jerusalem in the West Bank”

    Show it in the article

    “Israel's presence in the West Bank”

    Why this matters
    The word "presence" stands in for the occupation. It describes military rule and settlement as a neutral fact of being there.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it that the Palestinians want the UN to refuse to recognise a lawful Israeli presence.
    The context
    The ICJ's 2024 advisory opinion holds Israel's occupation of the West Bank unlawful. Refusing to recognise it follows from that opinion. It is not a new challenge to a lawful situation.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe ICJ's July 2024 advisory opinion holds Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful and the settlements illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The Palestinians are also seeking, for the first time, a UN declaration refusing to recognise Israel's occupation of the West Bank, which the ICJ has held unlawful, and a policy of differentiation between the occupied West Bank and Israel.

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “anti-Israel UN resolutions”

    Why this matters
    The headline labels the resolutions "anti-Israel" in Ynet's own voice before saying what they contain.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the resolutions to be hostile to Israel as such.
    The context
    The body lists resolutions on aid to Palestinian refugees, protection of their property and condemnation of settlements. Those are measures on specific policies, not opposition to Israel itself.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“resolutions addressing assistance to Palestinian refugees, protection of their property and livelihoods”

    Show it in the article

    “a series of anti-Israel resolutions”

    Why this matters
    The opening sentence repeats the label and adds that the resolutions are "aimed at challenging the country's international standing". This presents a motive as fact.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the purpose of the resolutions to be harming Israel, not addressing refugees or settlements.
    The context
    Ynet's own later sentence calls them "resolutions critical of Israel". That is a fair description, and the opening label goes beyond it.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“seeking to advance resolutions critical of Israel”

    Show it in the article

  4. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “They are trying to exploit the situation to challenge us from the UN podium”

    Why this matters
    Danon is the only person quoted. His charge that the Palestinians are exploiting the situation, and his phrase "diplomatic attack", close the article.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the Israeli ambassador's reading of the Palestinian motive as the account of what the resolutions are for.
    The context
    The Palestinian delegation is the subject of the story, but it is never quoted. Its own reasons for the resolutions on refugees, settlements and E1 are not given.

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Ynet News (English)

  1. 8 Nov‘Every day, I move from grief to the life I’m trying to build. It’s emotional torture’0.0
  2. 8 Nov‘I wish Gaza would be swallowed by the sea’: Ben-Gurion’s 1956 warning revealed3.0
  3. 5 NovTony Blair meets Herzog in Israel as US pushes to revive stalled Gaza reconstruction plan6.0
  4. 5 Nov‘Troubling résumés’: Meet the newly elected judges at The Hague and their ties to Israel6.0
  5. 4 NovOctober 7: New details reveal five red-hot Hamas warnings Israel missed0.0

Everything we scored from Ynet News (English)