Daily Express, on UK Politics, 2 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Moment GB News star : ‘Nasty!’

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Moment GB News star loses it in furious Labour eruption: ‘Nasty!’ The MP took umbrage at a question about his living arrangements. Share Article Share Article Facebook X LinkedIn Reddit Bluesky Email Copy Link Link copied Add us as preferred source Comments By Fran Winston , Showbiz Reporter 08:15, Mon, Nov 2, 2026 Updated: 09:31, Mon, Nov 2, 2026 Peter Bleksley Slams Labour MP Over 2nd Home Labour MP and GB News regular Barry Gardiner lashed out at former Scotland Yard officer Peter Bleksley after he probed him about his housing arrangements live on air.

The pair were appearing on the news channel discussing the money spent on activities for migrants when the subject turned to Gardiner's own finances. Bleksley enquired: "How far is your constituency from Westminster ? About eight miles. So why did you need a second taxpayer-funded home close to Parliament?" he asked. , Gardiner shot back: "When I was a minister, I wasn't living in the constituency at the time, and...I had to have a driver for the red box.

Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT "As a result of that, you had to, as a minister, be located in Westminster because otherwise your driver couldn't get home and get you the red box. Bleksley tried to interject, but Gardiner was determined to have his say and defend himself. "It was a nasty question," . "And you tried to catch me out, but actually there was a perfectly legitimate reason for it. Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT "And if you knew how Parliament operated, you wouldn't have tried it," he insisted.

Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT Barry Gardiner and Peter Bleksley clashed on GB News (Image: GB News) "It was a perfectly legitimate question," Bleksley insisted. "And I stand by why I said MPs should live in the constituencies that they should represent. "One who's got a constituency eight miles from central London does not, in my opinion, deserve or need a second home in Westminster," he said. Gardiner faced public and media scrutiny during the 2009 expenses scandal over his use of Parliamentary housing and travel allowances.

He bought a flat in Pimlico in 2003 for £246,500 and sold it in 2007 for £445,000, making a profit of £198,500. Over four financial years, he claimed roughly £81,935 in additional costs allowances to cover mortgage interest and council tax of about £1,000 a month on the property. Barry Gardiner took umbrage at being quizzed about his living arrangements on GB News (Image: GB News) Doctor Who and Dad's Army icon dies as son pays heartbreaking tribute Strictly's Jaime Winstone shares dad Ray's advice after feeling 'vulnerable' His expense claims for the flat included over £11,000 for renovations, including a kitchen, plumbing, and rewiring, and specific furnishings and accessories such as £235 Harrods bed linen and a £248 Christopher Wray light.

Meanwhile, he had designated his family home in Chorleywood, Hertfordshire, outside London, as his main residence, using the Westminster-area flat as a second home for late-night parliamentary work. This was despite his Brent North constituency being a short commute away on the Jubilee line. At the time, he maintained that he followed the rules in place, paid capital gains tax on the property's profit, and argued that the arrangement was comparable to the cost of renting.

GB News Labour Party Share Article Share Article Facebook X LinkedIn Reddit Bluesky Email Copy Link Link copied Add us as preferred source Comments

Read the original article on express.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Daily Express reports a GB News exchange in which Peter Bleksley asked Labour MP Barry Gardiner about a second taxpayer-funded home, then recaps Gardiner's 2009 expenses record. In its own voice the outlet describes Gardiner as losing it, clearly thrown and fuming, though the quotes it prints show him explaining his reasons and calling the question nasty. The expenses recap is sourced in detail and ends with Gardiner's defence.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “loses it in furious Labour eruption”

    Why this matters
    The headline says Gardiner "loses it" in a "furious Labour eruption", words of a man out of control.
    The impression it gives
    A reader expects to see an MP lose his temper on air.
    The context
    The quotes the article prints show Gardiner giving a reason for the second home and objecting to the question. The strongest words he uses are that it was a nasty question.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“actually there was a perfectly legitimate reason for it”
    • Elsewhere in the article“you had to, as a minister, be located in Westminster”

    Show it in the article

    “Clearly thrown”

    Why this matters
    The Express tells the reader in its own voice what state Gardiner was in before quoting his answer.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as fact that the question rattled him.
    The context
    The article prints an answer that explains his ministerial arrangements in detail. Nothing in the quotes shows he was thrown. That is the outlet's reading, not a reported fact.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“otherwise your driver couldn't get home and get you the red box”

    Show it in the article

    “he fumed”

    Why this matters
    The verb "fumed" is attached to a short remark, after "lashed out" and "determined to have his say" earlier in the piece.
    The impression it gives
    A reader hears the line as an angry outburst.
    The context
    The article reports only that he called the question nasty and said there was a legitimate reason. Bleksley's replies get the neutral verbs "insisted" and "said".

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“It was a perfectly legitimate question," Bleksley insisted”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “he maintained that he followed the rules in place, paid capital gains tax on the property's profit, and argued that the arrangement was comparable to the cost of renting”

    After recapping the expenses claims, the article gives Gardiner's own defence instead of leaving the allegation unanswered.

  • “does not, in my opinion, deserve or need a second home in Westminster”

    Bleksley's view is quoted and kept as his opinion, not turned into the outlet's verdict.

  • “He bought a flat in Pimlico in 2003 for £246,500 and sold it in 2007 for £445,000, making a profit of £198,500”

    The expenses history is given with specific dates and figures that a reader can check.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Express

  1. 2 NovIs Rachel Reeves right to say the UK should rejoin the EU?0.0
  2. 2 NovAngela Rayner gives even more rights to small boat migrants – they can sue7.3
  3. 2 NovI asked Andy Burnham's Makerfield about his 'Brexit U-turn' - he should be worried3.0
  4. 2 NovLabour's latest scandal adds insult to injury - it's laughable0.0
  5. 2 NovShabana Mahmood to water down key immigration crackdown after Labour backlash0.0

Everything we scored from Daily Express