Fox News, on Iran, 8 November 2026

8.2out of 10Serious

Trump ‘holds all the cards’ in , White House says

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.6 findings

JERUSALEM — With Iran’s missing-in-action Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei taunting Americans about the "collapse" of the U.S. after the midterm elections, the White House and Middle East experts argue President Donald Trump is positioned to defeat .

The remaining two years of Trump’s Iran policy have profound implications for his legacy and could lay the foundation for a new Middle East devoid of the region’s worst state sponsor of terrorism, the Islamic Republic of Iran, should Trump pursue new military actions to dislodge Khamenei’s regime, according to experts.

Khamenei, who has not been seen in public since a joint U.S.-Israel airstrike killed his father, former Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, and members of his family, boasted on X following the Republican defeat in the midterms: "The process of the US's collapse has accelerated."

on Iran’s theocratic state.

A White House spokesperson told Fox News Digital, "The United States is in a very strong position with control of the Strait of Hormuz and the Iranian economy collapsing. Iran has been decimated, and things will go one of two ways; the easy way or the hard way. President Trump holds all the cards and will do whatever is best for the United States."

The spokesperson added, "Only President Trump knows what he will do and when."

The Islamic Republic ramped up its over the last week. Tehran presented a "Trump in a Cage" exhibit with a mock execution of Trump to coincide with the regime’s anniversary of its illegal seizure of the U.S. Embassy and kidnapping of its personnel on Nov. 4, 1979.

to the U.S. An AI-generated video published by state-controlled Iranian media outlets shows the spokesperson of the headquarters of the Islamic Republic of Iran Armed Forces threatening Western Europe.

"We are not like you," the spokesperson said. "Iran does not harm innocents. You are not our enemy. But anyone, anywhere in Europe, who assists America in harming our women and children is our enemy, and we will punish them."

The video features military targets in France, Germany and Britain.

Navid Mohebbi, who worked as a Persian media analyst for the State Department's Public Affairs Bureau, told Fox News Digital that Mohsen Rezaei, secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, went so far as to claim that Iran had inflicted a political defeat on Trump in Washington, in addition to its supposed victories on the battlefield and in the Strait of Hormuz.

"Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf similarly portrayed the election results as an American rejection of the war," Mohebbi said.

He argued it was part of a broader psychological and political campaign.

"Tehran, along with commentators sympathetic to the regime in the United States, ," Mohebbi said. "Evidence does not support the claim that the Iran war alone caused the Republican defeat. According to national exit polling, only 4% of voters identified foreign policy as the country’s single most important issue."

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says that Trump acknowledged the war was partly to blame for the midterm losses, or that JD Vance said "the reason we lost is the war". Without this, a reader takes the link between the war and the defeat to be Iranian propaganda, when the US president and vice president made it themselves.

How we know

The phrase "finish the job" has become synonymous with toppling .

"I believe President Trump should finish the job, because the fundamental threats posed by the Islamic Republic remain unresolved," Mohebbi said, adding the nuclear file is far from closed.

"Iran’s highly enriched uranium stockpile remains unaccounted for under international verification, and the regime has retained the ability to rebuild elements of its ballistic missile program," he said. "More importantly, its underlying strategic behavior and hostility toward the United States and its regional allies have not fundamentally changed."

Former Pentagon official Simone Ledeen told the London-based Iran International news organization the Islamic Republic "needs to end" and the regime will never change its behavior. She called for support for Iran’s people on the ground and opposes putting American troops on the ground.

was one of the most decisive foreign policy achievements of his administration, according to popular American commentators like Ben Shapiro.

Shapiro termed Trump’s Operation Epic Fury campaign against Iran "the single bravest foreign policy move of my lifetime."

"What you’re watching him [Trump] do in Iran is not only unprecedented in terms of its political courage. I think that it is and has the potential to be a true game changer for America’s role in the world, not only for the next 10 or 20 years, but for the coming century," Shapiro told Lara Trump on Fox News' "My View" in March.

Mohebbi said there is also a critical factor that Washington must understand: the Islamic Republic is attempting to wait out the Trump administration. Even if Trump were to negotiate the strongest possible agreement today, he believes Tehran would view it as a temporary arrangement rather than a permanent change in its strategic direction.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article does not mention that negotiations mediated by Qatar are under way between Iran and the US, aimed at ending the war. A reader is left with military action as the only live option.

How we know

"The regime calculates that a future Democratic administration would not resort to military action against it," he said. "Once Tehran believes the threat of military force is off the table, it will become even more defiant in its behavior and more brazen at the negotiating table."

Another school of thought is to subcontract military actions to Israel against Iran’s regime.

Mardo Soghom, an Iran expert who has written extensively about the Islamic Republic, told Fox News Digital that Tehran's strategy has always been to wait out U.S. pressure.

"They were hoping to ride out the Trump administration's pressures for two more years. Now they believe they have it," Soghom said. "I think he should give full support to Israel to do the job and not interfere. The U.S. should continue to maintain its blockade of Iran and facilitate shipping from the Persian Gulf, but except hitting well-protected and highly dangerous targets, such as nuclear sites if needed, the U.S. should stay out of continuous attacks because its internal political situation is messed up."

Soghom, who tracks Iranian regime media, added the Iranian state radio is celebrating the Democratic victory.

"Incidentally, 47 years ago today, the new Islamic regime in Tehran gave the green light to its supporters to attack and seize the U.S. embassy," he said. "This election result will embolden them, and they'll not be inclined to compromise with the Trump admin — or even a future Democrat. Like in most other things, Trump did not finish the job when he could."

Jason Brodsky, policy director at United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI), told Fox News Digital that Iran sees the midterm election results as exacting a political cost from the Trump administration for launching Operation Epic Fury.

"It hopes these electoral losses will deter this and future administrations from launching military operations against Tehran over its aggression and terrorism," Brodsky said, adding that at the same time, Iranian decision-makers are likely eyeing Trump warily.

"President Trump has proven unpredictable and, with over two years left in office, that is a lot of time for the U.S. to continue to damage the Iranian regime," Brodsky said.

He noted that while Congress can complicate and raise objections, historically, without a veto-proof majority, it retains limited options for checking executive branch operations in this space.

"The 2006 midterm elections are instructive here, where, despite the prevailing anti-war sentiment at the time, President Bush still authorized a surge in the Iraq War," Brodsky said.

Read the original article on foxnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (6)

Fox News lets a former State Department analyst wave away the link between the Iran war and the Republican midterm defeat as a "wildly exaggerated narrative" pushed by Tehran. It never tells readers that Trump and JD Vance themselves blamed the war, as CNN reported. In its own voice it also calls Iran's nuclear programme an "illegal atomic weapons system", a claim nobody in the article backs, and it fills its narration with verdict words like "rogue regime", "radical Islamist" and "jingoism" while quoting only hawkish voices.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “His decision to confront Iran’s illegal atomic weapons system”

    Why this matters
    The outlet writes "Iran’s illegal atomic weapons system" as a given. The attribution to Ben Shapiro covers only the praise for Trump's decision, not the existence of the weapons system.
    The impression it gives
    That Iran has a nuclear weapons system and that this is established fact.
    The context
    Nothing in the article shows Iran has a weapons system. The article's own most hawkish source speaks only of a uranium stockpile that is unaccounted for. The article never cites the IAEA or any finding that a weapons system exists.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Iran’s highly enriched uranium stockpile remains unaccounted for under international verification”

    Show it in the article

    “Veteran Iran observers and experts have noted Trump was the first U.S. leader not to kick the Iran nuclear weapons problem down the road.”

    Why this matters
    The outlet uses "have noted", a verb that treats a claim as fact, and attaches it to unnamed observers. "The Iran nuclear weapons problem" presupposes that a weapons programme exists.
    The impression it gives
    That a nuclear weapons programme is an agreed fact, and that a consensus of experts says so.
    The context
    No named source in the article says Iran has nuclear weapons. The only specific claim, in S27, concerns an enriched uranium stockpile and missile capacity.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the regime has retained the ability to rebuild elements of its ballistic missile program”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Ben Shapiro called Trump's decision to strike Iran over its nuclear programme one of his administration's most decisive achievements. Analyst Navid Mohebbi says Iran's highly enriched uranium stockpile remains unaccounted for.

  2. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Serious

    “is trying to promote the wildly exaggerated narrative that confronting the Islamic Republic carries an unbearable electoral cost for American politicians”

    Why this matters
    Mohebbi casts the idea that the war cost Republicans votes as propaganda from Tehran and its sympathisers. The article sets nothing against it.
    The impression it gives
    That only Iran and "commentators sympathetic to the regime" link the war to the Republican defeat.
    The context
    CNN reported that Trump himself told Fox News the war was partly to blame, and that Vice President JD Vance said outright that the war was the reason Republicans lost.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Mohebbi argued the war alone did not cause the defeat, citing exit polls. Trump himself said the war was partly to blame, and Vice President JD Vance said the war was the reason Republicans lost.

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    The article never says that Trump acknowledged the war was partly to blame for the midterm losses, or that JD Vance said "the reason we lost is the war". Without this, a reader takes the link between the war and the defeat to be Iranian propaganda, when the US president and vice president made it themselves.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  4. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “the remnants of the rogue regime”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the outlet calls Iran's government a "rogue regime" and reduces it to "remnants".
    The impression it gives
    That Iran's government is an outlaw rump already on the verge of collapse.
    The context
    These are verdicts, not facts reported in the article. Iran's government is, per CNN, conducting negotiations through Qatari mediators.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “The radical Islamist clerical ruler’s braggadocio”

    Why this matters
    The outlet labels Mojtaba Khamenei a "radical Islamist" and calls his post "braggadocio" in narration, not in a quote.
    The impression it gives
    That the outlet has established Khamenei as an extremist whose words are empty boasting.
    The context
    The article reports one post on X. Nothing in it supports the label "radical Islamist". This is the outlet's own characterisation.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“boasted on X following the Republican defeat”

    Show it in the article

    “bellicose anti-American and anti-Western rhetoric and activities”

    Why this matters
    The outlet characterises Iran's statements as "bellicose" in its own voice before reporting them.
    The impression it gives
    That Iran is the aggressor in the confrontation.
    The context
    The same article reports that a joint US-Israel airstrike killed Iran's former Supreme Leader and members of his family. The verdict word sets that aside.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“a joint U.S.-Israel airstrike killed his father”

    Show it in the article

    “The ayatollahs did not restrict their jingoism”

    Why this matters
    The outlet uses "the ayatollahs" for Iran's government and "jingoism" for its warning to Europe, both in narration.
    The impression it gives
    That the warning is clerical chauvinism, not a stated threat tied to the war.
    The context
    The quoted video says Iran will target those in Europe "who assists America in harming our women and children". It is a conditional threat linked to the US war, not a general jingoistic outburst.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“who assists America in harming our women and children is our enemy”

    Show it in the article

    “the 47-year ironclad totalitarian rule of the Islamic Republic”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls Iran's system "ironclad totalitarian rule" in its own voice, in a sentence explaining a slogan for regime change.
    The impression it gives
    That toppling Iran's government is a settled aim that needs no argument.
    The context
    This is the outlet's verdict, unattributed to any source.

    Show it in the article

    “war against Iran’s regime”

    Why this matters
    The headline, in the outlet's voice, describes the US war as a war against "Iran’s regime".
    The impression it gives
    That the war targets only a government, not Iran.
    The context
    The body itself calls Operation Epic Fury a "campaign against Iran", and the US is maintaining a blockade of the country.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Operation Epic Fury campaign against Iran”

    Show it in the article

  5. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “was met with tough statements from the White House and leading Middle East experts”

    Why this matters
    The outlet presents the White House and a set of hawkish commentators as "leading Middle East experts". It then quotes only them: a former State Department analyst, a former Pentagon official, United Against Nuclear Iran and Ben Shapiro.
    The impression it gives
    That expert opinion is united in favour of further military action against Iran.
    The context
    Other analysts read the moment differently. The International Crisis Group's Hamidreza Azizi told CNN that ending the war requires nuclear concessions Iran now sees no reason to give. No Iranian official is quoted directly except through a video.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  6. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article does not mention that negotiations mediated by Qatar are under way between Iran and the US, aimed at ending the war. A reader is left with military action as the only live option.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Fox News

  1. 7 NovTop Gulf official offers glimmer of hope on Trump-Iran nuclear talks as threat of war hangs over region3.0
  2. 7 NovUS offers $20 million reward for information on Iran's nuclear program3.0
  3. 4 NovIran takes a victory lap over stunning US election results, claims 'collapse has accelerated'8.0
  4. 2 NovIranian ‘ghost fleet’ filmed evading US blockade en route to China, UANI says3.0
  5. 31 OctTrump admin threatens Iran with 'consequences' as allies convene amid threats of post-election escalation7.3

Everything we scored from Fox News

See how 23 outlets covered this story