The Scotsman opinion piece, on UK Politics, 7 November 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

The problem with threatened strike action by Scottish civil servants over working from home

No framing issues found.

Until the Covid pandemic hit, office working was the norm for many people, and the few who worked from home usually did so perhaps one or two days a week. But even new habits, it seems, can die hard. Civil servants working for the Scottish government and staff at four quangos – Social Security Scotland, Community Justice Scotland, Transport Scotland and Disclosure Scotland – are being balloted about potential strike action over efforts to persuade them to work in their offices on two days a week.

According to the PCS union, the government’s requirement that staff should be office-based 40 per cent of the time is “unacceptable”. READ MORE: SNP's top civil servant 'not scared' of unions despite not monitoring workers' return to office Ruby Gibson, the union’s national officer for Scotland, complained this was an “arbitrary target” and argued that “public services can be delivered effectively through flexible and hybrid working”. Home working enabled “better work-life balance, improved productivity and a more inclusive workforce, including for disabled workers...”, she said.

Gibson added that “rather than building on those gains, the Scottish government is... replacing trust with surveillance, flexibility with rigid targets and constructive employment relations with the threat of disciplinary action”. For those who buy such arguments, it may sound rather sinister. However, working in an office two days a week is hardly worthy of Orwellian rhetoric about surveillance. It’s not that long ago that virtually every office worker, well, worked in an office.

READ MORE: Anger as civil servants told: if you don't like it then you are free to leave Flexible working does have its place, and to a much greater degree than before the pandemic. The ability to do so has become part of the negotiations between employer and employee, alongside pay and other conditions. Many people regard it as a benefit in kind and a positive incentive to take a job. However, there are also considerable benefits from working together in the same place with colleagues – particularly the passing on of knowledge from seasoned veterans to younger, more inexperienced staff.

That kind of inherited knowledge is vital to most organisations and especially so for those charged with the smooth running of government. We hope civil servants remember who they serve and who pays their wages, and vote against strike action.

Read the original article on scotsman.com (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

The Scotsman argues in a leader comment that Scottish civil servants should vote against strike action over a rule that they work in the office 40 per cent of the time. It sets out the PCS union's case in the union's own words before arguing against it, and its figures and description of the ballot match other reporting. Nothing in it misleads the reader on the matters an opinion piece is judged on.

Opinion piece: read for false claims of fact and for fairness to the people it names, not for its opinions.

What it gets right

  • “Social Security Scotland, Community Justice Scotland, Transport Scotland and Disclosure Scotland”

    The Scotsman names exactly which bodies are being balloted, which matches the Daily Mail's report of the same ballot.

  • “According to the PCS union, the government’s requirement that staff should be office-based 40 per cent of the time is “unacceptable”.”

    The Scotsman attributes the union's position to the union and gives the correct figure for the requirement, so the reader knows what is being disputed.

  • “Home working enabled “better work-life balance, improved productivity and a more inclusive workforce, including for disabled workers...”, she said.”

    Before arguing against the union, The Scotsman quotes its national officer at length in her own words, including the point about disabled workers.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Scotsman

  1. 7 NovReaders' Letters: Don't wear poppies in October and they'll have more meaning8.7
  2. 7 NovSNP's ‘Choose Scotland’ slogan has some alarming connotations – Brian Wilson0.0
  3. 7 NovDouglas Alexander: SNP has short-changed Glasgow by £357 million0.0
  4. 7 NovRemembrance Day: Poppies do not glorify war yet every year brings more controversy – Stephen Jardine0.0
  5. 6 NovReaders' Letters: It's time to cap political donations in the UK0.0

Everything we scored from The Scotsman