The Scotsman opinion piece, on UK Politics, 7 November 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

Remembrance Day: Poppies do not glorify war yet every year brings more controversy – Stephen Jardine

No framing issues found.

Another year, another row about the poppy. Remember the time Fifa tried to ban them from football shirts on November 11? Or when an ITV newsreader faced a deluge of abuse for opting not to wear one? It wouldn’t be this time of year without some controversy about this little symbol of sacrifice. So a century after it was introduced, why do we still care so much? We care because it matters. Do what you do. If you want to wear a white poppy or a Palestinian poppy or no poppy at all, feel free.

But the freedom to make choices and behave as you wish was hard won and that is what the poppy commemorates. READ MORE: A 100-year-old WWII veteran's answer to the question 'How do you stop wars?' Remembrance emerged from the vast outpouring of grief that marked the end of the First World War. In 1921, Anna Guerin took her idea of using silk versions of the poppies that bloomed through the mud and death on the Western Front to raise funds to support veterans.

The newly formed Royal British Legion recognised the simple dignity of the idea and ordered a million for sale. In 1926, the Lady Haig Poppy Factory opened in Edinburgh, giving work to veterans. A century on it remains in the original premises at Warriston, producing five million poppies every year. If you’ve never paid a visit, I’d recommend taking part in one of their excellent tours. Looking at the old photos and mementos on the walls, something is clear.

The poppy doesn’t glorify war, instead it symbolises remembrance – the act of remembering and showing respect for someone who has died or a past event. READ MORE: Purple poppy coat unveiled at War Horse memorial to commemorate service animals for remembrance day Let’s remember those numbers. Close to 150,000 Scots died during the First World War. Their names are recorded on war memorials in every village, town and city in the land. My hometown Dumfries suffered the highest casualties of any place in Scotland during the Great War with nearly 5 per cent of the population losing their lives.

My grandfather narrowly survived and came home terribly injured. Then his son, my father, was called up to serve in the Second World War and saw kamikaze pilots slam into troop carriers in the Pacific. They made sacrifices we’ve never been asked to make. They fought global aggression – now life is all about the injustice of micro-aggressions. This year’s row has already blown over. Poppy-wearing pubgoers in Hampshire claim they were turned away from Wetherspoons, sparking calls for a boycott of the chain.

Only then did it turn out to be a big misunderstanding with Wetherspoons pointing out they are long-standing supporters of the poppy appeal and raised £55,000 for it last year. READ MORE: Young generation must not forget our WWII heroes and why they fought As the years pass and the old soldiers leave us, you might think these controversies would fade as remembrance flickers. Instead, it seems to go from strength to strength. More than 10,000 will march past the cenotaph on Whitehall tomorrow with millions more attending events all over the country.

In these turbulent times, with so much division, we should be proud of the role remembrance continues to play in our national life. Every poppy controversy shows we care. Every poppy sold shows we remember. We’ve not been required to fight. We are only expected to remember those less lucky than us. Surely that’s not too much to ask?

Read the original article on scotsman.com (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

Stephen Jardine's column argues that the poppy commemorates sacrifice rather than glorifying war, and that yearly rows over it show people still care. It is an argument about remembrance, and nothing in the material shows a false claim, misleading figure, smear or vilified community. Nothing in it misleads the reader.

Opinion piece: read for false claims of fact and for fairness to the people it names, not for its opinions.

What it gets right

  • “If you want to wear a white poppy or a Palestinian poppy or no poppy at all, feel free.”

    The columnist names the Palestinian poppy and the white poppy as legitimate choices. He does not cast those who wear them as disloyal.

  • “Only then did it turn out to be a big misunderstanding with Wetherspoons pointing out they are long-standing supporters of the poppy appeal and raised £55,000 for it last year.”

    The column reports how the Hampshire pub row was resolved and gives the chain's response. The boycott claim is not left standing unanswered.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Scotsman

  1. 7 NovReaders' Letters: Don't wear poppies in October and they'll have more meaning8.7
  2. 7 NovThe problem with threatened strike action by Scottish civil servants over working from home0.0
  3. 7 NovSNP's ‘Choose Scotland’ slogan has some alarming connotations – Brian Wilson0.0
  4. 7 NovDouglas Alexander: SNP has short-changed Glasgow by £357 million0.0
  5. 6 NovReaders' Letters: It's time to cap political donations in the UK0.0

Everything we scored from The Scotsman