The Jerusalem Post, on Iran, 1 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Hezbollah unlikely to attack Israel in case of US-Iran war - report

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Hezbollah is not likely to join in if the United States and Iran renew military operations against each other unless Iran's leadership faces an existential threat, according to a Saturday report from United Arab Emirates state-owned news outlet, The National.Hezbollah would, according to a senior Lebanese official, join the fight despite its weakened military capacity .

The official said that an explicit red line was crossed in the previous bout, when the Khamenei was killed in a joint US-Israeli strike on February 28.“We knew earlier this year, when the war in the region first broke out, that Hezbollah would join the fighting if [late Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali] Khamenei were killed,” said the anonymous official. “We even informed the Americans about it.”KAN news reported last month that have maintained their presence in southern Lebanon's pilot zones, gathering intelligence and recuperating their fighting ability.Hezbollah rearming with Iranian fundsHezbollah has spent at least three months preparing for a resumption of hostilities with Israel, after receiving an infusion of cash from Iran, according to Lebanese security personnel briefed on its activities.

remains committed to attacking Israel and has used a lull in hostilities since June to rearm, with a focus on procuring explosives and producing drones that can be flown into the security zone, two Lebanese security sources told Reuters.One of the sources, and another close to Hezbollah, said the group had received tens of millions of dollars from Iran to help boost its military capabilities. That is in addition to around $200 million that previously received from Tehran, which Reuters reported earlier this month.

The group has been restoring command-and-control structures that broke down in key battles, according to one of those sources and three other security officials familiar with the group's operations.In response to questions from Reuters, Hezbollah's media office rejected the suggestion that its command-and-control systems had broken down.A US State Department spokesman said Washington would keep strangling Hezbollah's finances through sanctions and other measures.

A US Treasury spokesperson said Iran was running out of money and ways to move money.Trump pulling for Lebanese peace, Israeli withdrawalUS President Donald Trump pledged to secure a full Israeli withdrawal from southern Lebanon if Beirut agrees to join the Abraham Accords, a senior Gulf diplomatic source told the Lebanese newspaper Ad-Diyar.The claim was published in an article by Lebanese journalist Nour Naameh amid ongoing diplomatic efforts and concerns in Lebanon over the potential consequences of another military confrontation between the US and Iran.According to the report, the source described the American promises as official commitments.

However, the newspaper provided no documents supporting the claims, did not identify the diplomat or the country he represents, and offered no confirmation from the White House.The report also did not specify when the commitments were made, who they were communicated to, or whether a timetable had been set for their implementation.Senior Israeli officials responded to the report by insisting that Israel would not withdraw its forces before Hezbollah was disarmed.Anna Barsky and Reuters contributed to this report.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Jerusalem Post reports The National's story on when Hezbollah might join a renewed US-Iran war, then adds Reuters material on Hezbollah rearming with Iranian money. In its own voice it calls Hezbollah a terror group three times without attribution. In its headline and its paraphrase of the official it calls Iran's government a 'regime', where its own first sentence and The National speak of Iran's leadership.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Hezbollah terror operatives”

    Why this matters
    The Jerusalem Post turns KAN's report into its own description and calls Hezbollah members 'terror operatives' with no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as settled fact, in the paper's voice, that the people in southern Lebanon are terrorists.
    The context
    This is a verdict the article does not support with any fact in the sentence. The National reports the same group by name, as Hezbollah.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “The terror organization”

    Why this matters
    The paper replaces the group's name with 'The terror organization' in a sentence based on Reuters sources.
    The impression it gives
    A reader reads the label as part of what the sources reported, not as the paper's own word.
    The context
    Nothing in the sentence attributes the label to anyone. The National names the group and reports that it has refrained from fighting Israeli troops.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “the terror group”

    Why this matters
    The paper uses the label a third time, now for a funding figure that Reuters reported.
    The impression it gives
    Repeated in the paper's voice, the label reads as the established identity of the group.
    The context
    The label is the paper's own word and has no source attached. The funding claim comes from Reuters, which the sentence credits only for the figure.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“which Reuters reported earlier this month”

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “unless regime under threat”

    Why this matters
    The headline writes 'regime' in the paper's own voice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the Lebanese official's condition as being about an illegitimate 'regime'.
    The context
    The body's first sentence and The National both speak of Iran's leadership. The headline swaps in the paper's own loaded word.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “if the Iranian regime's survival was found to be at stake”

    Why this matters
    The paraphrase of the anonymous official calls Iran's government 'the Iranian regime' without quotation marks.
    The impression it gives
    A reader thinks this is the official's word or a neutral description.
    The context
    The National's account of the same official speaks of 'Iran and its ruling system', not a 'regime'.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 1 NovTrump says US ready to hit Iran's nuclear program 'in ten minutes' after speaking with Netanyahu3.0
  2. 31 OctTrump 'has not made a decision' on Iran, Rubio tells press6.0
  3. 31 OctAraghchi says Vance's letter 'positive step' toward opening dialogue between Iran, US3.0
  4. 31 OctIsrael prepares for possible Iran escalation as US delays military action until after midterms6.0
  5. 31 OctEgyptian foreign minister 'extremely worried' US-Iran escalation will have major impact on Mideast0.0

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post