City AM, by Maurício Alencar, on UK Politics, 5 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

New Mandelson files to be released ‘by Christmas’

Findings are available in the analysis below.2 findings

New files relating to Lord Peter Mandelson’s appointment as US ambassador are expected to be published by Christmas, City AM can reveal. The senior civil servant Cat Little has written to MPs, saying the Metropolitan Police has allowed the government to publish new files which were previously held back by the Metropolitan Police pending an ongoing investigation into Mandelson. Little said the Met had previously asked the government not to publish a series of documents so that a criminal investigation on the former Labour grandee’s alleged leaks of sensitive information to the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who died in prison in 2019.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article says the Met has allowed the government to publish files it previously held back, but never says that some documents will continue to be held back at the Met's request. A reader may think the police hold has been lifted entirely.

How we know

It is unclear what the new files will show or which part of his appointment they will relate to. MPs on a security committee will now redact any information which may prejudice national security or international relations. Documents in Epstein files at the beginning of the year appeared to show that Mandelson passed on confidential information about bailouts and Treasury assets to Epstein at around the time of the 2008 financial crisis.

Mandelson was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office and released on bail. It was reported in the summer that an investigation was at risk of collapsing. Mandelson files to return to Westminster Sir Keir Starmer, who resigned as Prime Minister in the summer, came under considerable pressure over his handling of Mandelson’s appointment as US ambassador in 2024 and what security concerns were raised during a vetting process.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article reports Mandelson's arrest on suspicion of misconduct in public office and documents that appeared to show he passed confidential information to Epstein. It never says he has repeatedly denied criminal wrongdoing, so a reader may think the allegation stands uncontested.

How we know

Starmer’s former chief of staff Morgan McSweeney resigned over his involvement in Mandelson’s appointment. Kemi Badenoch introduced a ‘humble address motion’, a mechanism which compels the government to release internal documents. In the first batch of files released in March, exchanges showed security concerns over vetting were highlighted by Whitehall officials and national security adviser Jonathan Powell. The saga over vetting concerns led to the sacking of Sir Olly Robbins, who was then the Foreign Office’s top civil servant.

A second release in June revealed discussions held between ministers and Mandelson at the time he was serving in Washington DC. Documents featured some embarrassing remarks made by ministers, including the work and pensions secretary Pat McFadden . In one message, McFadden wrote about meetings with Labour MPs: “Every meeting I have is ‘who can we tax in order to pay benefits to others’. They’re asking the wrong questions.” The Metropolitan Police and Cabinet Office have been approached for comment.

Read the original article on cityam.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

City AM reports that more files on Lord Mandelson's appointment as US ambassador are expected before Christmas after the Met lifted its request to hold some back. It keeps the allegations against Mandelson hedged and attributed. It leaves out that some documents will still be withheld at the Met's request and that Mandelson denies criminal wrongdoing, but neither gap changes the picture much.

  1. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article says the Met has allowed the government to publish files it previously held back, but never says that some documents will continue to be held back at the Met's request. A reader may think the police hold has been lifted entirely.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article reports Mandelson's arrest on suspicion of misconduct in public office and documents that appeared to show he passed confidential information to Epstein. It never says he has repeatedly denied criminal wrongdoing, so a reader may think the allegation stands uncontested.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “alleged leaks of sensitive information”

    City AM keeps the allegation against Mandelson as an allegation while a criminal investigation is under way. It does not state it as fact.

  • “appeared to show that Mandelson passed on confidential information”

    City AM hedges what the Epstein documents show rather than presenting them as proof of the allegation.

  • “arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office and released on bail”

    City AM states the legal stage precisely: an arrest on suspicion and bail. It does not imply a charge or a conviction.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from City AM

  1. 6 NovBurnham urges firms to publish pay in job adverts ahead of new law3.0
  2. 6 NovHMRC bank account raid powers spark concern over burden of proof0.0
  3. 6 NovFestus Akinbusoye: I’m more fun than Cleverly 3.0
  4. 5 NovConsultancies vulnerable as government plots non-compete axe3.0
  5. 5 NovBurnham’s Ten Year Plan: a Poundland in every postcode?0.0

Everything we scored from City AM