The National, on Lebanon, 12 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Israel's war on Lebanon threatens climate goals, minister says

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findingsSee them marked on thenationalnews.com

Lebanon’s climate targets are being threatened by the environmental destruction wrought by Israel's military campaigns and occupation of the south, Tamara El Zein, Lebanon's Environment Minister, has said.

“If we don't take environmental recovery into consideration, some of our targets will not be reached,” Ms El Zein told The National in an interview at the Cop31 climate summit in Turkey.

Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam is to address the talks on Thursday.

Years of Israeli warfare have left farmland unusable, destroyed crops, forests and marine life, contaminated soil with phosphorus, and released toxins into the air over wide areas, said a report this year by Lebanon’s National Council for Scientific Research. In its foreword, Ms El Zein said the damage was an “act of ecocide”.

While some tree cover might be lost to forest fires in any year, the losses have multiplied as a result of Israeli attacks since 2023, Ms El Zein told The National in the Mediterranean city of Antalya, as heads of state gathered for the annual climate summit.

“From October 2023 until September 2026, we have already lost 16,000 hectares – completely burnt because of phosphorus bombardment or traditional munitions,” she said. Ms El Zein said a loss of 1,500ha a year would be more typical.

Alongside the burning of forest cover, which acts as a natural carbon sink and can help to reduce emissions, Ms El Zein said the uprooting of trees in Israeli operations and the spraying of glyphosate, a controversial herbicide, over areas of southern Lebanon were causing great damage to the environment.

The Israeli occupation also makes it difficult to monitor and fix environmental damage. “We cannot reach all the areas because it is still occupied by the Israeli army,” said Ms El Zein, a physical chemist by training.

In aiming to meet its climate commitments, “Lebanon is not going from the baseline zero,” but from “minus, minus, minus", she added.

and continued throughout 2024 before a ceasefire was reached. Fighting broke out again in Lebanon in March 2026 after the US and Israel began a war with Iran.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article says the 2024 phase ended when 'a ceasefire was reached' but never says that Israel kept attacking Lebanon after it. Without this, a reader assumes the destruction paused until March 2026. The minister's own figure for burnt forest runs continuously from October 2023 to September 2026.

How we know

Climate targets

Lebanon is a full signatory to Paris Agreement, a 2015 treaty to limit global warming, and has put forward targets to reduce carbon emissions to net zero by 2050, as well as to increase renewable energy generation.

As its nationally determined contribution – commitments made by countries to limit climate change under the Paris Agreement – it aims to reduce carbon emissions by at least 22 per cent and obtain a quarter of its electricity from renewable sources by 2035.

Ms El Zein said that the war had added “another layer” to existing environmental challenges but that Lebanon is “fully committed” to its climate goals. Nonetheless, its leaders face huge challenges in deciding how to spend their budget after the Israel-Hezbollah war.

Lebanon’s national adaptation plan to face the challenges of climate change needs $11 billion to the year 2035, but damage and losses from conflict since 2023 are estimated at more than $20 billion, Ms El Zein said.

“So priorities are, as you can see, shifting,” she said. It may be possible to link Lebanon’s adaptation to climate change with post-conflict reconstruction, but that will still need funding.

“We can somehow link between the two priorities, as we can consider that even reconstruction might be within a kind of concept of ‘build back better’ where environmental and climate resilience are included,” she said. “But still, as long as we don't have enough investment to move forward, it will be very, very difficult to implement.”

Postwar needs

Another challenge is the balance between environmental protection, tackling climate change, and the immediate realities of war-affected Lebanese struggling to get by every day. More than 300,000 people remain displaced, the UN said at the end of last month, and .

since 2023 and villagers wanting to go home “will not be waiting 'til you are doing sustainable rubble management", Ms El Zein said.

Lebanon is trying to approach the issue of rebuilding while being “environmentally and climatically compliant", she added. “It will be complicated because also it requires additional funding. It requires maybe more time. So we need to find the good balance between all these factors.”

Lebanon’s delegation at the Cop31 conference will highlight in negotiations the need for what Ms El Zein described as “special treatment” in climate financing funds for countries made fragile by war, whose situation can change drastically in the time it takes for applications to be approved.

“For all these multilateral funds, there must be a specific treatment for fragile countries like Lebanon, mainly after wars,” she said. “They should put also some kind of accelerated track, because our priorities are shifting from year to another, while any application will take at least two to three years to be approved.”

Read the original article on thenationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The National names Israel as the cause of Lebanon's environmental destruction in its headline and opening, and gives the environment minister space to describe phosphorus bombardment, tree uprooting and glyphosate spraying. Its short background passage then says the war 'broke out' between Israel and Hezbollah and ends the 2024 phase with a ceasefire, without saying Israel kept attacking. Later it reports destroyed homes in the passive voice and puts the rubble down to 'the conflict', with no actor.

  1. Tells the event as something else

    Minor

    “Conflict broke out in Lebanon between Israel and the militant group Hezbollah in 2023”

    Why this matters
    The phrase 'Conflict broke out ... between Israel and the militant group Hezbollah' casts the destruction the article describes as the product of an even contest between two forces.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away thinking the damage came from a two-sided war rather than from Israeli attacks on Lebanon.
    The context
    The article's own sentences attribute the destruction to Israel alone, and Al Jazeera describes Israel attacking large swaths of southern Lebanon since 2023.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Hides who did it

    Minor

    “tens of thousands of homes have been damaged or destroyed”

    Why this matters
    The passive 'have been damaged or destroyed' gives the destroyed homes no actor.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is not told in this passage who destroyed the homes.
    The context
    The record shows Israeli strikes destroyed more than 40,000 homes in Lebanon. The article's own headline and opening name Israel, which limits the harm.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “The conflict has produced an estimated 26 million tonnes of rubble”

    Why this matters
    The words 'The conflict has produced' make an abstraction the source of the rubble.
    The impression it gives
    A reader sees the rubble as a by-product of a shared conflict rather than of Israeli demolition and bombardment.
    The context
    Al Jazeera reports Israeli troops detonating homes and infrastructure in the south, and the record attributes the destruction of homes to Israeli strikes.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article says the 2024 phase ended when 'a ceasefire was reached' but never says that Israel kept attacking Lebanon after it. Without this, a reader assumes the destruction paused until March 2026. The minister's own figure for burnt forest runs continuously from October 2023 to September 2026.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “the environmental destruction wrought by Israel's military campaigns and occupation of the south”

    The opening names Israel as the actor and calls its presence in the south an occupation.

  • “completely burnt because of phosphorus bombardment or traditional munitions”

    The minister's quote names the concrete weapons, including phosphorus, that burnt 16,000 hectares.

  • “the uprooting of trees in Israeli operations and the spraying of glyphosate”

    The article attributes specific environmental harms directly to Israeli operations rather than to an agentless war.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The National

  1. 8 NovLebanese envoy in Detroit 'has no place' in US, State Department says 0.0
  2. 6 NovIsraeli forces abduct Lebanese olive picker as restrictions cut off more than half of village farmland0.0
  3. 6 NovCould French judges bring Israeli officials to justice over Lebanon attacks?3.0
  4. 3 NovHezbollah is betting its future on Iran as Lebanon becomes a proxy battlefield0.0
  5. 3 NovGermany to maintain presence in Lebanon after Unifil ends, deputy defence minister says3.0

Everything we scored from The National

See how 6 outlets covered this story