New York Post, on Iran, 5 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Top US commander launches podcast joking about retirement --- as Trump weighs next Iran move

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

WASHINGTON — Iran is reviewing US-backed proposals on the fate of its nuclear program, as the top American commander in charge of combat operations oddly launched a podcast on Thursday making jokes about eating French fries and retiring to play basketball. A US official told The Post that Qatari officials have been mediating fresh discussions with Tehran about its nuclear program. At least three meetings on “concrete proposals” have occurred in the past week, The New York Times first reported , with summits in Tehran and Doha.

Trump remained coy about his intentions, telling reporters in the Oval Office: “I would rather not destroy the rest of the country if possible, but maybe I’ll have to. You’ll know soon enough.” It’s unclear what details the documents may contain. Reuters reported later Thursday that Iran returned a copy of one nuclear proposal to the US via Qatari mediators. The news emerged as Adm. Brad Cooper, commander of US Central Command, launched the new podcast “ Inside CENTCOM ” on YouTube featuring light-hearted banter — as Cooper’s head is on the chopping block following Republican midterm election losses driven by the war. 4 Adm.

Brad Cooper, who supervises military operations in the Iran War, has emerged as a possible scapegoat for midterm election losses. X/CENTCOM Explore More 97-year-old dies at his own birthday party moments after dancing to ‘Stayin’ Alive’ Gavin Newsom lets all of California’s 548 death row inmates escape ultimate punishment Dad, 34, made desperate call to wife moments before he drowned in Florida flood: ‘I don’t know what to do’ “I never met a French fry I didn’t like, and thus the need to exercise frequently to balance that out,” Cooper confessed — as opponents and proponents of the war alike point to him as a possible fall guy for the longer-than-expected conflict, with focus also on Secretary of War Pete Hegseth .

“This is another fun fact: When I retire at some point, I am going to be a professional free throw shooter,” Cooper added. One source close to the White House blasted Cooper as “awful” and a “total neocon.” A Pentagon source conversely pointed to his past working under first lady Michelle Obama and then-second lady Jill Biden as executive director of the “Joining Forces” military family support program. “This explains why the war in Iran has been prosecuted like Obama would have prosecuted [it],” the second source said.

“It is nuts and explains why it’s gone so badly. Obama would do these pinprick strikes and Cooper essentially did the same thing early on.” The blame game within the administration has focused mostly on Hegseth, who advocated for launching the war and ultimately oversaw its conduct. 4 Secretary of War Pete Hegseth is himself on the chopping block. ZUMAPRESS.com A different administration source told The Post that President Trump, who has been asking allies what to do about the secretary of war, has “gone negative” on Hegseth, saying he overpromised a quick victory, which the president initially told journalists would wrap up in “four weeks or so.”

Left out here: Drops what it reported before

The article names only Hegseth and the US administration as launching the war. It never says that Israel launched it alongside the US in late February, a fact the Post itself reported a week earlier and other outlets carried. Without it, a reader believes the war is a US-only campaign, and Ghalibaf's "Israel-First" remark reads as having no basis in the events.

How we know

Hegseth’s top spokesman, Sean Parnell, said Wednesday that he intended to remain through the end of Trump’s term, ruling out an obvious off-ramp taking an appointment to fill the Senate seat of Tennessee Gov.-elect Marsha Blackburn. If he stays, Hegseth is likely to be impeached by the Democrat-controlled House and put on trial by the Democrat-led Senate for conducting the conflict without congressional authorization. Hegseth, whose Biden-holdover chief of staff Ricky Buria has stoked constant in-fighting within the administration, defended himself in a video posted to X Thursday, saying : “They attack me, they attack us, because we are effective.

It’s not going to work. We will not back down.” In a further twist sinking Hegseth’s standing within the administration, two social media influencers who worked for the Pentagon earlier this year tweeted Wednesday that Hegseth should run for president in 2028 — against Vice President JD Vance. Both influencers are no longer working for the Pentagon, a defense official said, with one leaving in July and the other in October. 4 Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said last Sunday that progress was being made in peace talks.

AFP via Getty Images The Pentagon and CENTCOM press offices did not immediately comment on the in-fighting. A possible new peace agreement with Iran would build on a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed by Trump and Vance in June. That deal collapsed over disagreements on shipping routes in the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian parliament speaker Mohammad Ghalibaf, one of the country’s leading negotiators, .

Vance has been a key figure in restarting talks with Iranian officials ahead of the 2026 midterms, even as Trump, suggested — until recently — that could escalate following Election Day. The vice president, who blamed the war for Republican election defeats, penned a letter to Iran’s Supreme National Security Council secretary Mohsen Rezaei in late October — with Trump’s blessing — in an effort to resume talks . 4 President Trump on Monday ruled out attacking Iran after the midterm elections.

JIM LO SCALZO/EPA/Shutterstock “The president and I both feel pretty good about the prospects for potentially coming to a negotiated settlement,” Vance said Monday, referencing both “kinetic” and “non-kinetic” options. The same day, Trump also batted down the prospect of renewing strikes in the aftermath of the midterm elections. Several times the president has suggested Pickaxe Mountain, a heavily fortified facility near the Natanz nuclear facility, as a possible target.

Trump has also demanded that Iran can’t achieve a nuclear weapon and must dispose of any “nuclear dust” remaining in its stockpiles. Meanwhile, Iranian leaders like Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei : “The process of the US’s collapse has accelerated.” US Central Command hasn’t telegraphed any immediate signs that a return to full-scale attacks on Iran are in the works.

Reps for the White House and Iran’s foreign ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Read the original article on nypost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The New York Post reports Iran's review of US proposals alongside infighting over the war's conduct, attributing most claims to named or unnamed sources. In its own voice it calls Iran's government "the mullahs" and its leader a "gloating" theocrat, and it frames the Iranian speaker's warning as a mere claim made "despite" talks. It also never says that Israel launched the war with the US, a fact the Post itself reported a week earlier.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “US war against the mullahs”

    Why this matters
    The Post calls Iran's government "the mullahs" in its own narration, with no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes in a dismissive, religiously coded label for the Iranian state as neutral description.
    The context
    Elsewhere the Post itself uses neutral terms such as Tehran and Iranian officials. "Mullahs" is a verdict word that belongs inside quotation marks, attributed to whoever used it.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“mediating fresh discussions with Tehran”

    Show it in the article

    “issued jeering statements following the elections, with the in-hiding theocrat gloating”

    Why this matters
    The Post describes Mojtaba Khamenei's statement with "jeering", "gloating" and "in-hiding theocrat", all in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the leader's quoted remark as mockery from a cowardly cleric, not as a political statement.
    The context
    The quoted words, "The process of the US's collapse has accelerated", are a claim the Post could simply report as said. The Post never explains why he is in hiding. Other coverage reports that US and Israeli strikes killed his predecessor on February 28.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “claimed on X Thursday that Trump “is prepping the next war phase while America teeters on an Israel-First cliff,” despite talks being underway”

    Why this matters
    The Post introduces the Iranian speaker with "claimed" and adds, in its own voice, "despite talks being underway". US officials elsewhere simply "said" or "told".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes Ghalibaf's warning as baseless, contradicted by the talks.
    The context
    The Post's own article reports Trump threatening to destroy "the rest of the country" and repeatedly naming Pickaxe Mountain as a target. That makes Ghalibaf's warning a contested view, not one that the talks disprove.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“I would rather not destroy the rest of the country if possible”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Several times the president has suggested Pickaxe Mountain”

    Show it in the article

  2. Drops what it reported before

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article names only Hegseth and the US administration as launching the war. It never says that Israel launched it alongside the US in late February, a fact the Post itself reported a week earlier and other outlets carried. Without it, a reader believes the war is a US-only campaign, and Ghalibaf's "Israel-First" remark reads as having no basis in the events.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “Hegseth, who advocated for launching the war and ultimately oversaw its conduct”

    The Post names a US official as responsible for starting and running the war, not presenting it as something that simply happened.

  • “Reps for the White House and Iran’s foreign ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment”

    The Post records that it sought comment from both the US and Iranian governments.

  • “Reuters reported later Thursday that Iran returned a copy of one nuclear proposal to the US via Qatari mediators”

    The Post attributes the development on the talks to its source instead of stating it as its own fact.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from New York Post

  1. 7 NovTrump confirms fresh US strikes on Iran defenses as talks turn to nuke inspectors3.0
  2. 7 NovHow Iranians are fighting despotic Islamist regime with personal acts of defiance6.0
  3. 7 NovState Dept. offers $20 million reward for information about Iran’s nuke program 3.0
  4. 6 NovAlarming satellite images show construction near Iran missile bases: report6.0
  5. 4 NovIran gloats over Trump's midterm blowout: 'US collapse has accelerated'6.0

Everything we scored from New York Post