New York Post, on Iran, 6 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

satellite images show construction near Iran missile bases: report

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

new satellite images suggest that Iran has been rapidly rebuilding its missile bases that were decimated by months of airstrikes by the US and Israeli military, according to a new report. Photos from November show evidence of construction and digging at two of Iran’s biggest military bases: Garmdareh base in Karaj, near Tehran, and the Shahroud base in the north, analysts with British intelligence company MAIAR, who reviewed the photos, told BBC Verify .

At least 12 other military sites, including missile complexes and airbases, show signs of repairs and construction, according to the images. The Islamic Republic, which has been barraged by US and Israeli attacks since February, has “a pattern of moving infrastructure underground to protect them from further strikes,” an MAIAR analyst told the outlet. Maxar satellite imagery shows tunnel entrances at the Isfahan Nuclear Technology Center in Isfahan, Iran. ©2025 Maxar Technologies Moving facilities underground makes it more difficult for Iran’s adversaries to determine the full extent of their operational capabilities, according to Mark Mellett, a defense analyst and former head of the Irish military.

Explore More Ukraine knocks out 15 Russian oil refineries, causing $23.2 billion in damage: officials Multiple grizzlies may have attacked mother and daughter found dead: Canadian authorities Terrifying moment woman intervenes in bush struggle between koala and python The apparent excavations near Shahroud could be tied to the production of missiles, Jim Lamson, a former CIA analyst and Iran expert, told the BBC. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps are likely attempting to move its production facilities underground after the nearby airbase has been repeatedly targeted for airstrikes, he said.

Volunteer fighters conduct military drills in Tajrish Square, Tehran, Iran, Monday, Nov. 2, 2026. Anadolu via Getty Images Both bases in Shahroud and Karaj appear to show significant excavations. Multiple vehicles could be seen in the satellite images as well as improvements in Karaj, the BBC reported. The images near Karaj seem to reveal the construction of “a new portal for an underground facility,” said Sam Lair, research analyst at the Foreign Policy Research Institute (FPRI).

Analysts from Janes Defense Intelligence also identified tunnel entrances at Karaj and structures indicative of a possible expansion of damaged or destroyed missile bases. The rapid construction is likely because Iran is preparing for further attacks from the US and Israel — which have slowed in recent weeks after Trump announced a pause on strikes before the midterm elections , said Mark Cancian, military analyst with the International Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).

comes after Sean Parnell, the Pentagon’s chief spokesman, told the Wall Street Journal that the US had “destroyed up to 90% of Iran’s drone, ballistic missile, and naval industrial base” and “significantly degraded Iran’s ability to launch missiles and drones.” However, Tehran claims it retains large stockpiles of missiles, according to state media. And despite setbacks, the Islamic Republic is back to producing liquid-propellant ballistic missiles , negating what the Trump administration has called a major accomplishment of Operation Epic Fury, the WSJ reported in September, citing US officials.

The president only has a small window after the midterm elections to renew his war on Iran before a new Democrat-dominated Congress is likely to rein in his war powers, experts told The Post . While Trump is pushing renewed negotiations with Iran, he has threatened that he would “finish the job” in Iran if the Islamic Republic fails to submit to his demands. Iran appears well-aware of this development and .

Left out here: Drops what it reported before

The article says Trump has only a small window after the midterms to renew his war on Iran and has threatened to 'finish the job'. It leaves out that the Post itself reported the previous day that Trump had on Monday ruled out attacking Iran after the midterm elections. Without it, a reader believes renewed US strikes are on the table right after the vote, which also colours the claim that Iran's diplomacy is a stalling tactic.

How we know

Read the original article on nypost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

The New York Post reports BBC Verify's satellite analysis of construction near Iranian missile bases and names the US and Israel as the forces that bombed them. It then adds its own verdicts: it calls the images 'alarming' and 'troubling', calls Iran's government 'the regime', and closes by stating as fact, with no source, that Iran is making threats and pursuing diplomacy only to 'run out the clock'. It also leaves out its own report from the day before that Trump had ruled out attacking Iran after the midterms.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “the regime continues to push for diplomacy — while also ramping up threats across the region in an attempt to run out the clock”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice, with no source attached, the Post says Iran is 'ramping up threats across the region' and that its diplomacy is 'an attempt to run out the clock'.
    The impression it gives
    That it is established fact that Iran's talks are a stalling tactic and that Iran is escalating threats across the region.
    The context
    No analyst, official or report in the article is given for either claim. They state an unseen motive of a government as fact. The Post's own reporting a day earlier described Iran reviewing US-backed nuclear proposals through Qatari mediators, with its foreign minister saying progress was being made.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Alarming”

    Why this matters
    The headline calls the satellite images 'Alarming' in the Post's own voice.
    The impression it gives
    That the construction is in itself a cause for alarm, as an established judgement.
    The context
    The BBC report the Post draws on describes the same images neutrally as major construction. No source in the article calls them alarming.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “Troubling”

    Why this matters
    The opening sentence repeats the verdict, calling the images 'Troubling' before giving any of the analysts' findings.
    The impression it gives
    That repairs to bombed bases are a threat, before any evidence has been set out.
    The context
    The analysts quoted describe repairs and moves underground to protect against further strikes, which the article itself reports as a response to months of US and Israeli bombing.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“a pattern of moving infrastructure underground to protect them from further strikes”

    Show it in the article

    “The alarming report”

    Why this matters
    The Post labels the BBC's analysis 'The alarming report' a third time, again in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    That the report's content has been judged alarming by someone other than the Post.
    The context
    The BBC frames its own report as satellite analysis of construction and repairs, not as an alarm.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “the regime”

    Why this matters
    The Post calls Iran's government 'the regime' in its own narration, with no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    That Iran's government is illegitimate as a matter of fact rather than someone's view.
    The context
    The source report refers to the Iranian armed forces and to Iran without the label. 'Regime' is a verdict, not a description.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  4. Drops what it reported before

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article says Trump has only a small window after the midterms to renew his war on Iran and has threatened to 'finish the job'. It leaves out that the Post itself reported the previous day that Trump had on Monday ruled out attacking Iran after the midterm elections. Without it, a reader believes renewed US strikes are on the table right after the vote, which also colours the claim that Iran's diplomacy is a stalling tactic.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from New York Post

  1. 5 NovTop US commander launches podcast joking about retirement --- as Trump weighs next Iran move3.0
  2. 4 NovIran gloats over Trump's midterm blowout: 'US collapse has accelerated'6.0
  3. 3 NovIsrael privately warns US that Iran is considering use of chemical weapons: report3.0
  4. 3 NovWhy Trump only has a few weeks to restart Iran war — and what he could target with new strikes6.0
  5. 3 NovIran slams US response to negotiations, demands America 'fully and explicitly' address its 7 outlandish conditions3.0

Everything we scored from New York Post