New York Post, on Iran, 5 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Top US commander launches podcast joking about retirement --- as Trump weighs next Iran move

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.6 findings

WASHINGTON — Iran is reviewing US-backed proposals on the fate of its nuclear program, as the top American commander in charge of combat operations oddly launched a podcast on Thursday making jokes about eating French fries and retiring to play basketball. A US official told The Post that Qatari officials have been mediating fresh discussions with Tehran about its nuclear program. At least three meetings on “concrete proposals” have occurred in the past week, The New York Times first reported , with summits in Tehran and Doha.

Trump remained coy about his intentions, telling reporters in the Oval Office: “I would rather not destroy the rest of the country if possible, but maybe I’ll have to. You’ll know soon enough.” It’s unclear what details the documents may contain. Reuters reported later Thursday that Iran returned a copy of one nuclear proposal to the US via Qatari mediators. The news emerged as Adm. Brad Cooper, commander of US Central Command, launched the new podcast “ Inside CENTCOM ” on YouTube featuring light-hearted banter — as Cooper’s head is on the chopping block following Republican midterm election losses driven by the war. 4 Adm.

Brad Cooper, who supervises military operations in the Iran War, has emerged as a possible scapegoat for midterm election losses. X/CENTCOM Explore More 97-year-old dies at his own birthday party moments after dancing to ‘Stayin’ Alive’ Gavin Newsom lets all of California’s 548 death row inmates escape ultimate punishment Dad, 34, made desperate call to wife moments before he drowned in Florida flood: ‘I don’t know what to do’ “I never met a French fry I didn’t like, and thus the need to exercise frequently to balance that out,” Cooper confessed — as opponents and proponents of the war alike point to him as a possible fall guy for the longer-than-expected conflict, with focus also on Secretary of War Pete Hegseth .

“This is another fun fact: When I retire at some point, I am going to be a professional free throw shooter,” Cooper added. One source close to the White House blasted Cooper as “awful” and a “total neocon.” A Pentagon source conversely pointed to his past working under first lady Michelle Obama and then-second lady Jill Biden as executive director of the “Joining Forces” military family support program. “This explains why the war in Iran has been prosecuted like Obama would have prosecuted [it],” the second source said.

“It is nuts and explains why it’s gone so badly. Obama would do these pinprick strikes and Cooper essentially did the same thing early on.” The blame game within the administration has focused mostly on Hegseth, who advocated for launching the war and ultimately oversaw its conduct. 4 Secretary of War Pete Hegseth is himself on the chopping block. ZUMAPRESS.com A different administration source told The Post that President Trump, who has been asking allies what to do about the secretary of war, has “gone negative” on Hegseth, saying he overpromised a quick victory, which the president initially told journalists would wrap up in “four weeks or so.”

Left out here: Drops what it reported before

The Post reported a week earlier that the war was launched by Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Here Israel's part appears only inside Ghalibaf's "claimed" remark about an "Israel-First cliff", so a reader takes the war as a US-only venture and Israel's role as an Iranian assertion.

How we know

Hegseth’s top spokesman, Sean Parnell, said Wednesday that he intended to remain through the end of Trump’s term, ruling out an obvious off-ramp taking an appointment to fill the Senate seat of Tennessee Gov.-elect Marsha Blackburn. If he stays, Hegseth is likely to be impeached by the Democrat-controlled House and put on trial by the Democrat-led Senate for conducting the conflict without congressional authorization. Hegseth, , defended himself in a video posted to X Thursday, saying : “They attack me, they attack us, because we are effective.

It’s not going to work. We will not back down.” In a further twist sinking Hegseth’s standing within the administration, two social media influencers who worked for the Pentagon earlier this year tweeted Wednesday that Hegseth should run for president in 2028 — against Vice President JD Vance. Both influencers are no longer working for the Pentagon, a defense official said, with one leaving in July and the other in October. 4 Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said last Sunday that progress was being made in peace talks.

AFP via Getty Images The Pentagon and CENTCOM press offices did not immediately comment on the in-fighting. A possible new peace agreement with Iran would build on a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed by Trump and Vance in June. That deal collapsed over disagreements on shipping routes in the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian parliament speaker Mohammad Ghalibaf, one of the country’s leading negotiators, that Trump “is prepping the next war phase while America teeters on an Israel-First cliff,” despite talks being underway.

Vance has been a key figure in restarting talks with Iranian officials ahead of the 2026 midterms, even as Trump, suggested — until recently — that could escalate following Election Day. The vice president, who blamed the war for Republican election defeats, penned a letter to Iran’s Supreme National Security Council secretary Mohsen Rezaei in late October — with Trump’s blessing — in an effort to resume talks . 4 President Trump on Monday ruled out attacking Iran after the midterm elections.

JIM LO SCALZO/EPA/Shutterstock “The president and I both feel pretty good about the prospects for potentially coming to a negotiated settlement,” Vance said Monday, referencing both “kinetic” and “non-kinetic” options. The same day, Trump also batted down the prospect of renewing strikes in the aftermath of the midterm elections. Several times the president has suggested Pickaxe Mountain, a heavily fortified facility near the Natanz nuclear facility, as a possible target.

Trump has also demanded that Iran can’t achieve a nuclear weapon and must dispose of any “nuclear dust” remaining in its stockpiles. Meanwhile, Iranian leaders like Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei issued following the elections, with : “The process of the US’s collapse has accelerated.” US Central Command hasn’t telegraphed any immediate signs that a return to full-scale attacks on Iran are in the works.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article reports that Trump "ruled out attacking Iran" and that CENTCOM shows no sign of a return to full-scale attacks. It never says that the US military is still carrying out what it calls "defensive strikes" and is enforcing a naval blockade on Iranian oil. Without this, a reader believes US attacks on Iran have stopped and the only question is whether they resume.

How we know

Reps for the White House and Iran’s foreign ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Read the original article on nypost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (6)

The New York Post reports on Iran's review of US proposals and on the infighting over who to blame for the war. In its own voice it calls Iran's government "the mullahs", calls its leader a "gloating" theocrat, and has Iran's parliament speaker "claim" while US officials "say". It also states an unsourced charge against a named Pentagon official, and only briefly hints that US strikes and the blockade are still going on.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “US war against the mullahs”

    Why this matters
    The Post, in its own narration, calls the side the US is at war with "the mullahs".
    The impression it gives
    The US war is against a clique of clerics, not against Iran, its government and the people living under the bombing.
    The context
    "Mullahs" is a pejorative that carries a verdict. Elsewhere the article manages plain terms such as "Iran's foreign ministry" and "Iranian officials", so the slur is a choice in the outlet's voice.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Reps for the White House and Iran’s foreign ministry”

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “jeering statements”

    Why this matters
    The Post describes Iranian leaders' comments after the US election as "jeering" in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    Iran's leadership responded with mockery, not with a political statement.
    The context
    The only words quoted are "The process of the US’s collapse has accelerated", a political claim. The verdict that it was jeering is the outlet's own.

    Show it in the article

    “the in-hiding theocrat gloating”

    Why this matters
    The Post labels Mojtaba Khamenei "the in-hiding theocrat" and says he was "gloating", in narration, not in anyone's quotation.
    The impression it gives
    Iran's leader is a cowering, smug figure whose words need not be taken seriously.
    The context
    Nothing in the article supports "gloating" beyond the one sentence quoted. The label passes a verdict that the reporting does not show.

    Show it in the article

  3. Uneven attribution verbs

    Minor

    “claimed on X Thursday”

    Why this matters
    The Post says Iran's parliament speaker "claimed" that Trump is preparing the next war phase, and adds "despite talks being underway".
    The impression it gives
    Ghalibaf's statement is a doubtful assertion, while US officials' words are plain statements.
    The context
    Vance "said" and Trump "told reporters" elsewhere in the article. Trump himself is quoted saying "maybe I’ll have to" destroy the rest of the country, which gives Ghalibaf's reading some basis in the article's own reporting.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“I would rather not destroy the rest of the country if possible, but maybe I’ll have to.”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Vance said Monday”

    Show it in the article

  4. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “whose Biden-holdover chief of staff Ricky Buria has stoked constant in-fighting within the administration”

    Why this matters
    The Post states as its own fact that a named official, Ricky Buria, "has stoked constant in-fighting".
    The impression it gives
    It is established that Buria is the cause of the administration's infighting.
    The context
    The article gives no source for this charge. The Pentagon press office did not comment on the infighting.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“did not immediately comment on the in-fighting”

    Show it in the article

  5. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article reports that Trump "ruled out attacking Iran" and that CENTCOM shows no sign of a return to full-scale attacks. It never says that the US military is still carrying out what it calls "defensive strikes" and is enforcing a naval blockade on Iranian oil. Without this, a reader believes US attacks on Iran have stopped and the only question is whether they resume.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  6. Drops what it reported before

    Minor

    What is missing

    The Post reported a week earlier that the war was launched by Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Here Israel's part appears only inside Ghalibaf's "claimed" remark about an "Israel-First cliff", so a reader takes the war as a US-only venture and Israel's role as an Iranian assertion.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from New York Post

  1. 4 NovIran gloats over Trump's midterm blowout: 'US collapse has accelerated'6.0
  2. 3 NovIsrael privately warns US that Iran is considering use of chemical weapons: report3.0
  3. 3 NovWhy Trump only has a few weeks to restart Iran war — and what he could target with new strikes6.0
  4. 3 NovIran slams US response to negotiations, demands America 'fully and explicitly' address its 7 outlandish conditions3.0
  5. 3 NovUS forces hit Iran's Qeshm Island as part of a series of secret strikes: report3.0

Everything we scored from New York Post