Iran slams US response to negotiations, demands America 'fully and explicitly' address its 7 outlandish conditions

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.5 findings

Iran slammed America’s response to its latest peace proposal despite making the same seven outlandish demands President Trump rejected last month. “America’s response to Iran’s rights and demands was not convincing, and they must fully and explicitly address Iran’s seven conditions and act upon them,” Iranian Security Chief Mohsen Rezaei wrote on X. Iranians wave flags in front of an anti-US billboard of US President Donald Trump in Tehran’s Enghelab Square on Tuesday, Nov. 3, 2026.

AFP via Getty Images Mohsen Rezaei attends a ceremony at Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini’s shrine in southern Tehran, Iran, Thursday, June 4, 2026. NurPhoto via Getty Images “Only in this case will the Strait of Hormuz be reopened ,” he added. Iran has continued to push its seven-point deal as the only one on the table, which includes demands that the US pay for war damages, end its economic pressure campaign and free the regime’s ports from the naval blockade .

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article reports Iran's demand that the US pay war damages, and calls the demands outlandish, but never says the war was launched by the US and Israel against Iran on 28 February. Without this, a reader believes Iran is asking to be compensated for a war of unclear origin, rather than by the states that attacked it.

How we know

Anadolu Agency (English) reported“following the war launched by the US and Israel against Iran on Feb. 28”Iran delivers ‘firm, rational’ response to US, says ‘ball in America’s court to prevent war’ (opens in a new tab)

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article lists only war damages, ending economic pressure and the blockade among the seven conditions. It leaves out the reported demand for a ceasefire across the Middle East and the release of frozen assets, so a reader sees only the financial and pressure demands.

How we know

Anadolu Agency (English) reported“Tehran's reported seven conditions include a ceasefire across the Middle East, the release of Iranian assets frozen abroad”Iran says US response to its demands 'not convincing' (opens in a new tab)

Explore More US forces hit Iran’s Qeshm Island as part of a series of secret strikes: report Helicopters collide below Mount Everest base camp, killing 1 person and injuring 2 Sick details of Thomas Markle’s alleged child porn cache found in Philippines — as cops confirm FBI involvement The plan , notably, pushes aside any talks regarding Iran’s nuclear and missile program down the line.

Read the original article on nypost.com

What we found (5)

The New York Post calls Iran's seven conditions "outlandish" in its own voice, in both the headline and the opening line, and calls Iran's ports "the regime's" in its narration. It says Iran is making "the same" demands Trump rejected without noting that its own earlier reporting described the proposal as condensed. It lists only the financial and pressure demands, leaving out the reported call for a regional ceasefire and the release of frozen assets.

Uses a loaded word
Minor
“7 outlandish conditions”
Why this matters
The headline calls Iran's conditions "outlandish" in the Post's own voice, attached to a quoted demand.
The impression it gives
A reader takes it as settled fact that Iran's conditions are absurd before reading what any of them are.
The context
Nobody quoted in the article calls the conditions outlandish. The word is the Post's verdict. The conditions include ending a naval blockade and economic pressure, which other coverage reports as standard negotiating demands.
How we know
- Anadolu Agency (English) reported“progress toward restoring security in the Strait of Hormuz depended on Washington ending its naval blockade and addressing Iranian demands, including sanctions relief and the release of frozen assets”Iran delivers ‘firm, rational’ response to US, says ‘ball in America’s court to prevent war’ (opens in a new tab)
Show it in the article
“outlandish demands”
Why this matters
The opening sentence repeats "outlandish" as narration, so the verdict now frames the body of the report as well as the headline.
The impression it gives
A reader believes the Post's news report has established that Iran's position is unreasonable.
The context
The article gives no fact that shows the demands are outlandish. It lists them in S6 without assessing them, so the label rests on nothing but the Post's own word.
How we know
- Elsewhere in the article“demands that the US pay for war damages, end its economic pressure campaign”
Show it in the article
Drops what it reported before
Minor
“despite making the same seven outlandish demands President Trump rejected last month”
Why this matters
The Post says Iran is making "the same" demands Trump rejected, presenting Iran as having moved nothing.
The impression it gives
A reader believes Iran resubmitted an unchanged proposal and is simply refusing to budge.
The context
The Post reported the day before that Iran's proposal had been condensed so it could be implemented within two days. Anadolu describes it as a revised proposal. The claim that the demands are unchanged is contradicted by the Post's own earlier reporting.
How we know
- New York Post wrote earlier“Iran’s seven-step proposal, which is now condensed, making it possible to implement it within two days”US and Iran resume 'very intensive' peace talks on ending war — as Trump threatens new strikes (opens in a new tab)
- Anadolu Agency (English) reported“Iran’s revised seven-stage diplomatic proposal could be fully implemented within two days”Iran delivers ‘firm, rational’ response to US, says ‘ball in America’s court to prevent war’ (opens in a new tab)
Show it in the article
Uses a loaded word
Minor
“the regime’s ports”
Why this matters
The Post calls Iran's ports "the regime's" in its own narration.
The impression it gives
A reader takes the ports as belonging to an illegitimate ruling clique rather than to the country.
The context
These are Iran's ports, and the blockade affects the country as a whole. "Regime" is a verdict the article does not support with any fact, and it appears without attribution.
How we know
- Anadolu Agency (English) reported“depended on Washington ending its naval blockade”Iran delivers ‘firm, rational’ response to US, says ‘ball in America’s court to prevent war’ (opens in a new tab)
Show it in the article
Leaves out what changes the picture
Minor
What is missing
The article reports Iran's demand that the US pay war damages, and calls the demands outlandish, but never says the war was launched by the US and Israel against Iran on 28 February. Without this, a reader believes Iran is asking to be compensated for a war of unclear origin, rather than by the states that attacked it.
How we know
- Anadolu Agency (English) reported“following the war launched by the US and Israel against Iran on Feb. 28”Iran delivers ‘firm, rational’ response to US, says ‘ball in America’s court to prevent war’ (opens in a new tab)
Show where it belongs
Leaves out what changes the picture
Minor
What is missing
The article lists only war damages, ending economic pressure and the blockade among the seven conditions. It leaves out the reported demand for a ceasefire across the Middle East and the release of frozen assets, so a reader sees only the financial and pressure demands.
How we know
- Anadolu Agency (English) reported“Tehran's reported seven conditions include a ceasefire across the Middle East, the release of Iranian assets frozen abroad”Iran says US response to its demands 'not convincing' (opens in a new tab)
Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Anadolu Agency (English)Iran delivers ‘firm, rational’ response to US, says ‘ball in America’s court to prevent war’ (opens in a new tab)
Anadolu Agency (English)Iran says US response to its demands 'not convincing' (opens in a new tab)

Spot something we missed? Report this article

Iran slams US response to negotiations, demands America 'fully and explicitly' address its 7 outlandish conditions

Uses a loaded word

Drops what it reported before

Uses a loaded word

Leaves out what changes the picture

Leaves out what changes the picture

How other outlets reported it

More from New York Post