The National, on Iran, 28 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Iran 'welcomes negotiations' after reported Qatari-mediated draft deal

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

<a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/mena/iran/" target="_blank" rel="" title="https://www.thenationalnews.com/mena/iran/">Iran</a> welcomes “any effort aimed at negotiations”, an official said on Wednesday, after <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/tags/qatar/" target="_blank" rel="" title="https://www.thenationalnews.com/tags/qatar/">Qatari</a> mediators reportedly presented Tehran with .

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says who began the war the deal is meant to end. It calls it only "the conflict with the US". Without this fact a reader cannot tell that the US and Israel launched the war in February.

How we know

The agreement was presented to Iran on Sunday, an official briefed on the negotiations told <i>Reuters</i>. They added that Tehran was considering it and was expected ​to respond by the end of the week. The draft deal sets a seven-day timeline that addresses both Tehran's and Washington's concerns, laying out daily <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/mena/2026/10/25/pakistan-anwaar-ul-haq-kakar-interview/" target="_blank" rel="" title="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/mena/2026/10/25/pakistan-anwaar-ul-haq-kakar-interview/">confidence-building steps</a> each side must take, the official said.

The timeline could begin early next week, with several countries acting as guarantors of the deal. Iran did not immediately comment publicly on the draft. However, an Iranian official told <i>The National </i>that his country “welcomes any efforts aimed at negotiations, talks or collective consultation”. The report follows a visit to Tehran by officials from the Makkah pact countries – Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Turkey – who flew to Iran as part of a push for diplomacy and to chart a path towards resolving conflicts in the region.

The delegation was led by <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/2026/10/26/saudi-minister-of-defence-heading-delegation-to-tehran-with-makkah-pact-countries/" target="_blank" rel="" title="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/2026/10/26/saudi-minister-of-defence-heading-delegation-to-tehran-with-makkah-pact-countries/">Saudi Defence Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman</a>, signalling Saudi urgency amid escalating attacks by Yemen's Houthi rebels against the kingdom's airports and .

Pakistan’s army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, and Ibrahim Kalin, director of Turkey’s intelligence service, also attended Monday’s meeting in Tehran, which ended with Iranian state media saying the parties <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/gulf/2026/10/27/exclusive-iran-saudi-arabia-inside-tehran-talks/" target="_blank" rel="" title="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/gulf/2026/10/27/exclusive-iran-saudi-arabia-inside-tehran-talks/">agreed to continue discussions</a>.

Regional sources briefed on the talks said they made no clear headway. Sources had told <i>The National</i> that representatives of Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Turkey asked the Iranians to urge the Houthis to halt their attacks on the kingdom. Iran claimed it lacked leverage over its Yemeni allies to do so, explained the sources. Instead, the Iranians asked their guests to use their close relations with the US to persuade Washington to accept Iran’s offer of a two-week pause in hostilities across the region, the sources added.

The pause would allow negotiations to resume in return for the gradual reopening of the <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/uk/2026/10/21/sultans-state-visit-king-charles-praises-omans-noble-efforts-to-keep-strait-of-hormuz-open/" target="_blank" rel="">Strait of Hormuz</a>. On Wednesday, the Iranian official said that despite the limited outcome of the visit, the talks were “a step in the right direction”. They added that “this is a first confidence-building step between these countries” and “we see it as necessary to have a security framework that tries to keep things under control in the region”.

Two of the main items discussed were the <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/gulf/2026/10/26/fighting-intensifies-as-houthis-and-saudi-led-coalition-in-yemen-report-attacks/" target="_blank" rel="" title="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/gulf/2026/10/26/fighting-intensifies-as-houthis-and-saudi-led-coalition-in-yemen-report-attacks/">Houthi escalation</a> and the Strait of Hormuz. The US military said on Wednesday that vessels that have no need to move between ports in the Gulf of Oman and the Strait of Hormuz should stay away, as tensions ratchet up in the region.

“Due to the current geopolitical situation, vessels which do not need to transit the area are advised to remain well clear to avoid unnecessary delays to their voyage,” the US Naval Forces Central Command said in an advisory notice. “Vessels transiting this area are advised to plan additional transit time to allow for increased traffic density and military blockade enforcement operations,” the notice said. It was unclear what prompted the <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/mena/2026/10/24/us-issues-travel-advisories-for-13-middle-east-countries-after-houthi-attacks/" target="_blank" rel="" title="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/mena/2026/10/24/us-issues-travel-advisories-for-13-middle-east-countries-after-houthi-attacks/">advisory</a>.

The US military last publicly issued a similar notice in mid-July, when it began its blockade of Iranian shipping. Back then, it said the blockade would not impede neutral passage through Hormuz, though ships should expect to be questioned on their intentions. In Yemen, the Houthis called for ​the <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/mena/2026/10/28/live-iran-war-qatar/" target="_blank" rel="" title="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/mena/2026/10/28/live-iran-war-qatar/">immediate evacuation of the airport</a> in Aden, ⁠the city where the internationally recognised government is ⁠based.

Read the original article on thenationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The National reports a Qatari-mediated draft deal and an Iranian official's welcome for talks, but it describes the war only as a conflict between Iran and the US. Israel appears nowhere in the article, although other reports of the same deal say it aims to end the war with the US and Israel, and that there were fears Israel could resume attacks. A reader comes away with the wrong idea of who the deal is meant to stop fighting.

  1. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    “a new draft deal that would help to end the conflict with the US”

    Why this matters
    The words "end the conflict with the US" name the US as Iran's only opponent in the war the draft deal is meant to end.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the Qatari draft is about a two-party confrontation between Iran and the US, with no other state at war with Iran.
    The context
    Reports of the same draft, drawn from the same Reuters source, say the deal is meant to end the war with the US and Israel. They also say the US and Israel launched that war in February. Israel is not mentioned anywhere in the article.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “fears of a new round of war between the US and Iran”

    Why this matters
    The phrase "a new round of war between the US and Iran" again names only the US as the party that could resume attacks.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the only danger of renewed fighting comes from Washington and Tehran.
    The context
    The same day's reporting says there were concerns that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu could resume attacks on Iran this week. It also says Iran's threats were framed around the US and Israel resuming attacks. The article drops Israel from the danger it describes.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Qatari mediators reportedly presented Tehran with a new draft deal to end the war that the US and Israel launched in February. The visit came amid fears that the US or Israel could resume strikes on Iran.

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says who began the war the deal is meant to end. It calls it only "the conflict with the US". Without this fact a reader cannot tell that the US and Israel launched the war in February.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The National

  1. 28 OctOman calls for economic and security pact between Iran and Gulf countries3.0
  2. 28 OctUAE's Gargash says 'wars only lead to further crises' amid concerns of Iran escalation3.0
  3. 28 OctIran war puts Republican foreign policy hawks under pressure before midterms0.0
  4. 27 OctIran-linked Handala hacking group sends bouquets and letters to Israel polling sites6.0
  5. 27 OctInside Tehran talks: Iranians link Houthi de-escalation to US approval of regional truce6.0

Everything we scored from The National