The Irish Times, on Gaza, 12 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Taoiseach but says action at summits ‘unlikely’

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findingsSee them marked on irishtimes.com

Taoiseach Micheál Martin has said is “absolutely unacceptable”, but acknowledged there was little prospect of action arising from the summits in Dublin . Martin said Ireland was seeking to persuade EU leaders to do more for Gaza by putting pressure on Israel , but added that everyone was waiting for a new government in Israel. He said the leaders would discuss Palestine. However, speaking on his way to the European Political Community summit, he said the “informal networking” nature of the event means there is no question of sanctions against Israel being on the agenda.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article reports that "everyone was waiting for a new government in Israel" with nothing set against it. It leaves out that the UN humanitarian chief, Tom Fletcher, said waiting for a new Israeli government was not an acceptable reason to hold up aid. Without this, a reader may take the wait as an agreed and reasonable position.

How we know

He said there was “divergence of opinion” among EU countries. “It has been very difficult on the trade and economic front to get a 27-member state position,” he said. “That’s the unfortunate reality on that.” On Russia , he said it remains to be determined whether Vladimir Putin is serious about Ukraine peace talks. “Maintaining channels of communication is very important,” he said, adding that Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner had a “channel to Moscow” which is “very important”.

Asked about the meeting between Kushner and Witkoff and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy in Dublin on Thursday evening, he said he hoped there would be progress. “I think the objective of tonight’s meeting is to debrief president Zelenskiy on the engagement by Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner with president Putin and so it’s a moving situation,” he added. Speaking earlier on RTÉ Radio, Martin said Ireland has neither the inclination nor the disposition to be involved in wars, as he defended moves to abolish the triple lock. [ Government wants to send Irish troops on ‘Israel-friendly mission’, Mary Lou McDonald claims Opens in new window ] “We don’t have the wherewithal to be frank, [to be] involved in wars,” he said.

“Nor do we have any inclination or disposition to be involved in wars.” Martin rejected the suggestion that Ireland was “drifting into military alliances”. “We’re pulling our peacekeepers out of Lebanon because the United States, under pressure from Israel, had no desire to see the continuation of the Unifil mandate,” he said. “And we’ve been there since 1970. So the security council, in our view, is dysfunctional. We can’t rely on the security council any more for mandating peacekeeping missions.

“The same applies to Russia. The idea that Russia, which violates the UN Charter in the manner that it has through the invasion of Ukraine, should be determining whether Ireland takes part in the peacekeeping mission or not is bizarre and absurd in this day and age.” The Taoiseach said the legislation was very clear that any involvement in an international conflict would be a peacekeeping role and in accordance with the United Nations Charter.

“For 50 years, I’ve listened to people telling me we’re going to be joining a European army,” he said. “For 50 years, I’ve listened to people saying that we’re going to be involved in wars and conflict, and none of that ever happened.” [ I learned first hand that neutrality that can’t be defended is not neutrality at all Opens in new window ] The Taoiseach also pointed out that there was a constitutional prohibition on joining a mutual defence pact in Europe that would require a referendum to be overturned.

“That’s a very strong protection.” “We’re not members of Nato. So we won’t be deploying troops on EU missions that could lead us to be involved in foreign wars.”

Read the original article on irishtimes.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Irish Times reports the Taoiseach condemning the blocking of EU aid for Gaza, but in its headline and opening line it never says who is blocking it. Same-day coverage shows dozens of states calling on Israel to lift its restrictions on aid. The rest of the article reports Martin's remarks on peacekeeping and neutrality fairly and with attribution.

  1. Hides who did it

    Serious

    “condemns blocking of aid to Gaza”

    Why this matters
    The headline says aid to Gaza is being blocked but names no one doing the blocking.
    The impression it gives
    A reader of the headline learns that aid is blocked but not by whom, as if the blockage simply exists.
    The context
    Same-day coverage reports a coalition of states calling on Israel to remove its restrictions on aid entering Gaza. Israel is the party restricting the aid.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “the blocking of EU humanitarian aid for Gaza”

    Why this matters
    The Irish Times opens the body with a nominalisation, "the blocking", that again leaves the actor out of the sentence.
    The impression it gives
    The reader must guess who stops EU aid reaching Gaza. The later mention of "putting pressure on Israel" hints at it but never says Israel is restricting aid.
    The context
    53 UN member states on the same day urged Israel's incoming government to open Gaza to unrestricted aid. Shortages of shelter and medical supplies were putting Palestinians at risk as winter sets in.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Taoiseach Micheál Martin has condemned the blocking of EU humanitarian aid for Gaza as "absolutely unacceptable". On the same day, 53 UN member states urged Israel to lift its restrictions on aid entering Gaza.

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article reports that "everyone was waiting for a new government in Israel" with nothing set against it. It leaves out that the UN humanitarian chief, Tom Fletcher, said waiting for a new Israeli government was not an acceptable reason to hold up aid. Without this, a reader may take the wait as an agreed and reasonable position.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Irish Times

  1. 12 NovIsraeli air strike on Nasser hospital in Gaza kills six0.0
  2. 10 NovIsraeli air strike kills father and son in Gaza, medics say0.0
  3. 10 NovDangerous times for democracy3.0
  4. 5 NovAlbanese urges Ireland to ‘show spine’ on Palestine during EU presidency0.0
  5. 29 OctPalestinian student visas and scholasticide0.0

Everything we scored from The Irish Times