The Observer, on UK Politics, 3 November 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

Can Labour finally break gas’s grip on your bills?

No framing issues found.

John Healey’s budget contained signs of a shift in the government’s broader energy strategy, with the promise of substantial reforms in the prime minister’s forthcoming 10-year plan . This includes a new approach towards the levies and policy costs added to energy bills. Since around 2010, the cost of things such as support for low-carbon electricity generation and home retrofits has been passed on to energy users in the form of additional levies on their bills .

This has pushed up energy prices for households and businesses. Having already stopped some of these levies appearing on bills, the government has now announced it will add no new costs and introduce a new “cost control framework”. This thinking was on show in the budget: the cost of a new “gas-shipper obligation” that was due to be added to gas bills to fund new hydrogen projects will now be met from general taxation instead. Adam Bell, a partner and energy expert at consultancy PF Global, described this as a “genuine shift [and a] very, very positive sign that they want to move away from a system whereby you essentially use a stealth tax on the energy system to pay for other goals”.

The chancellor also announced that the government would take further steps to “break the grip of international gas prices on our bills”. One long-running frustration among policymakers is that despite the UK having expanded its renewable power generation, the market price for electricity is set by the most expensive generator required to meet demand at that moment, and quite a lot of the time that means gas-fired power plants. That leaves consumers exposed to volatility in international gas markets .

In addition, some older renewable generators are paid those higher gas-linked prices, even though their wind, solar or nuclear power is no more expensive to produce. The government is now consulting on proposals for a Wholesale Contracts for Difference (WCfD) scheme, which would enable – or encourage – those generators instead to switch to a fixed-price arrangement, as part of efforts to “de-link” electricity and gas prices. This is best thought of as a “price stabilisation” tool, said Callum MacIver, a research fellow at the University of Strathclyde, and as something that would “insulate electricity prices further from the impact of future gas price shocks”.

Removing some of the other subsidies provided to these legacy renewable generators would have greater potential to bring down bills, he added, but such efforts would come with legal risk and technical complications. Related articles: Trump boasts of boom, but voters may deliver a reckoning Labour cannot out-Farage Farage. Right to remain shouldn’t depend on your salary MacIver doesn’t think the budget marks a “massive change of direction”, but rather reemphasises a shift that was already taking place: towards “clean power, but not at any cost” .

Photograph by Andrew Aitchison / In Pictures via Getty Images Politics Energy Energy bills Renewable energy Gas

Read the original article on observer.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

The Observer explains the budget's energy measures: moving some policy costs off bills, paying for a hydrogen levy from general taxation, and consulting on a scheme to cut the link between electricity and gas prices. It attributes its evaluative language to named experts and sets out the limits and risks of the reforms. Nothing in it misleads the reader.

What it gets right

  • “Adam Bell, a partner and energy expert at consultancy PF Global, described this as”

    The article gives the loaded phrase "stealth tax" to a named expert in quotation marks rather than adopting it in its own voice.

  • “the market price for electricity is set by the most expensive generator required to meet demand at that moment”

    The article explains plainly why gas prices drive electricity bills, so the reader can judge the proposed reform for themselves.

  • “such efforts would come with legal risk and technical complications”

    The article reports the expert's caveats alongside the potential savings, so the reader does not come away with an inflated view of what the reform can do.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Observer

  1. 3 NovThere’s a way to ease the slavery reparations headache, and it isn’t cash0.0
  2. 3 NovBritain’s slavery debt can’t be wished away – no matter how hard the new right tries0.0
  3. 3 NovLabour cannot out-Farage Farage. Right to remain shouldn’t depend on your salary0.0
  4. 1 NovLabour could end council coalitions with Greens if ‘Zionism is racism’ motion stands3.0
  5. 1 NovVoters like Andy Burnham’s ‘everyday fixes’. The hard calls start now0.0

Everything we scored from The Observer