The Observer, on UK Politics, 1 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Labour could end council coalitions with Greens if ‘Zionism is racism’ motion stands

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Labour-Green council coalitions across the country could collapse this week over a Greens motion that labelled Zionism is racism . Some Greens groups have refused an ultimatum from Labour to disown the national party motion. There are 15 councils in England where the Greens and Labour are in some kind of power-sharing arrangement. The Labour National Executive Committee has assessed each Greens response and notified local Labour groups whether they were satisfied by the response.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says what the motion states. It reports a Labour official saying the Greens had not recognised 'the pain that that has caused Jews', but it never tells the reader that the motion defines Zionism as an ideology supporting an ethnonationalist Jewish state in historic Palestine to the exclusion or domination of the non-Jewish population. It does not name Palestinians or Palestine at all. Without this a reader can believe the motion is about Jewish people rather than a political ideology and a state's treatment of Palestinians.

How we know

In the case of Sheffield, where the Greens and Labour are in coalition, “the response has been lacking. Therefore there are consequences to that,” a Labour official in the city said, adding that the group would decide what happens to the coalition in the coming days. The Greens in Sheffield had released a statement acknowledging the motion had caused “concern” and saying they “believe Jewish people should not be persecuted”. But councillor Angela Argenzio followed that by saying: “If Labour chooses to destabilise Sheffield City Council over this, Labour owns the consequences.”

“They haven’t even recognised the pain that that has caused Jews in Britain or in Sheffield,” the official added, indicating that the break-up of the coalition was likely at a full meeting of the council on Wednesday. The NEC will make a formal announcement on Monday, the official said, after a deadline for Greens to respond to their request passed last Sunday. Reform UK, , have called for Labour to act on their threat.

Related articles: Government defends Palestine Action ban ahead of legal case Police commissioner demands answers over Luke Campbell ‘cyberflashing’ claims In Lewes, the power-sharing arrangement between Labour and Greens came to an end by mutual agreement, district council leader Zoe Nicholson, a Green, said on Friday. The Green group had written to Labour saying it did not agree with the national party’s Zionism motion. Despite this, Nicholson said in a Facebook post: “Given the national context, the unnecessary pressures from outside of the council, it was not possible to continue our very successful local partnership.”

The Labour leader in Lewes, Chris Collier, had resigned from the party to sit as an independent after Labour sent its letter to the Greens. Photograph by Alishia Abodunde/Getty Images Labour Politics Antisemitism Green Party Local government

Read the original article on observer.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Observer reports the Labour ultimatum to Green council groups fairly, attributing Labour's position to a named-role official and giving the Greens' replies in Sheffield and Lewes. It never says what the motion actually states, so a reader hears that it caused 'pain' to Jews but never learns that it defines Zionism as support for an ethnonationalist state in historic Palestine. In its own voice it also assigns Reform UK a motive it does not attribute to anyone.

  1. States a party's motive as fact

    Minor

    “sensing that the collapse of some coalitions may open some councils to their control”

    Why this matters
    The Observer says in its own voice that Reform UK was 'sensing' a chance to take control of councils.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes Reform's motive for urging Labour on as established fact.
    The context
    The article quotes no Reform figure and cites no source for this motive. It is the outlet's own reading of a party's unseen intent.

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says what the motion states. It reports a Labour official saying the Greens had not recognised 'the pain that that has caused Jews', but it never tells the reader that the motion defines Zionism as an ideology supporting an ethnonationalist Jewish state in historic Palestine to the exclusion or domination of the non-Jewish population. It does not name Palestinians or Palestine at all. Without this a reader can believe the motion is about Jewish people rather than a political ideology and a state's treatment of Palestinians.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “a Labour official in the city said”

    The Observer attributes Labour's verdict on the Greens' response to its source and does not adopt it in its own voice.

  • “The Green group had written to Labour saying it did not agree with the national party’s Zionism motion.”

    The Observer reports the Lewes Greens' position plainly and does not let the coalition's end read as a judgment on them.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Observer

  1. 1 NovVoters like Andy Burnham’s ‘everyday fixes’. The hard calls start now0.0
  2. 1 NovGovernment defends Palestine Action ban ahead of legal case3.0
  3. 1 NovAndy Burnham: ‘I will keep talking about hope until the people of Britain can feel it’0.0
  4. 31 OctPoliticians banned Palestine Action. Any decision to unban will be theirs too0.0
  5. 31 OctSwitch from crisis fire-fighting will save the country billions, says government0.0

Everything we scored from The Observer