The Jerusalem Post, on UK Politics, 12 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Save the Children UK decides not to adopt IHRA antisemitism definition despite review’s advice

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 findingSee it marked on jpost.com

Save the Children UK has decided to not adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism, despite its recommendation in the independent review commissioned by the charity.Save the Children UK is a respected British charity, established in 1919. It operates across more than 100 countries and territories, with a focus on emergency and disaster relief, child protection, health and nutrition, and education.

More recently, , and has also campaigned against the government's licensing of arms sales to Israel.In August 2024, Save the Children UK commissioned a report on anti-Muslim hate and antisemitism in response to feedback from colleagues following internal meetings stemming from the Israel-Palestinian conflict.Among other recommendations, the review called for the charity to "agree on an antisemitism definition that the organization recognizes, and it is suggested this is the IHRA definition."In response, the charity said, "We will carefully consider appropriate definitions for all faith- and race-related hate, including anti-Muslim hate and antisemitism, by December 2025 at the latest."However, George Graham, Director of Global Impact at Save the Children UK, told The Jerusalem Post on Thursday that a decision was made not to adopt the definition.Why Save the Children chose the Equality Act insteadHe told the Post that the charity "carefully considered different approaches to definitions and how they would work in practice" and also sought input from staff equality networks as part of that process.

Following this consideration, Graham said the Executive Leadership Team decided to use the Equality Act and ACAS guidance on race and religion or belief discrimination instead of the IHRA. "This is a unifying framework to support our work to be an inclusive workplace and provides a clear, inclusive and legally grounded basis for addressing religious and racial discrimination," he added.However, Graham said the charity "agreed" with the review's recommendation that staff avoid Nazi and Holocaust comparisons when discussing the Israel-Hamas War, and use the term "Zionist" carefully.

He also told the Post that Save the Children is "deeply sad and sorry" about the experiences of antisemitism and anti-Muslim hatred identified through the independent reviews we commissioned in 2024. and remains committed to tackling all forms of discrimination, including antisemitism. UK envoy calls decision a 'failure of leadership'Jon Pearce, a Labour MP and the UK's special envoy for post-Holocaust issues, told The Telegraph: “The IHRA definition is the internationally recognized benchmark for identifying antisemitism.“You cannot tackle a problem you are unwilling to identify, and Save the Children's failure so far to adopt it is a deeply troubling indication of a wider cultural problem and a serious failure of leadership."

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Jerusalem Post reports that Save the Children UK chose the Equality Act and ACAS guidance instead of a particular definition of antisemitism, and it quotes the charity's reasons. In its own voice the Post calls the charity's work in Gaza and the West Bank an "avid interest". The article's own account of the charity's humanitarian mandate does not support that phrase.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “it has taken an avid interest in Gaza and the West Bank”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Post calls the charity's work in Gaza and the West Bank an "avid interest" and places it beside its campaign on arms sales, in an article about antisemitism.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is nudged to see the charity's Palestinian work as a partisan fixation connected to the antisemitism complaints, rather than humanitarian work.
    The context
    The Post itself says the charity's focus is emergency relief, child protection, health and education across more than 100 countries. Work for children in Gaza and the West Bank falls inside that mandate. The article gives no fact that makes it an unusual or partisan interest.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“with a focus on emergency and disaster relief, child protection, health and nutrition, and education”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 10 NovBritain would prefer additional communication channels with Russia, Streeting says0.0
  2. 9 NovAround 78% of Britons view Israel as a serious threat to world peace, survey finds3.0
  3. 8 NovPro-Palestine activists spread pamphlets condemning Mann antisemitism review for NHS - report0.0
  4. 7 NovBritain’s colonial legacy undermines its moral lectures against Israel - opinion6.0
  5. 5 NovUK bans Palestinian-American activist flagged by antisemitism watchdog0.0

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post