Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on West Bank, 9 November 2026

8.7out of 10Severe

'We were ready for any mission':

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

"Maybe we're going to Gaza. Maybe another house in Hebron," the Gazit children, who are used to going with their parents to , tried to guess their next destination. Only when the families gathered in Mitzpe Yericho and were shown the photos of the houses did they learn that they were moving to Jericho. From there, they travelled to the houses on the outskirts of the ancient Biblical city, near the Hasmonean Palaces, : Dates.

Shmuel and Reshit Gazit, , tell Arutz Sheva-Israel National News that they were first contacted about three weeks before they entered the house. Approximately a week earlier, they received a list of what to prepare for the mission. "We are always prepared for any mission and happy to partake," Reshit says. "We have equipment ready for any mobilization." Zvi Elimelech Sharbaf, the chairman of the Nachala Movement, which oversaw the purchase of the houses, says that its details were kept secret to protect the Arab sellers from the Palestinian Authority's death penalty for anyone who sells property to Jews.

When it was learned that information about the sale reached others, the movement decided to move in sooner, fearing the PA would learn about it and other entities would take over the houses. Among the houses the families moved into was the Solomon House, named after the pioneer Yoel Moshe Solomon, who, before founding Petah Tikva, attempted and failed to purchase land in Jericho. "Today, we have the privilege of resettling in that murky valley."

During the first days, the families went from property to property to get to know their new homes. In one, they found an orchard full of fruit, while another property includes a freshwater spring. The homes were previously lavish vacation homes, and one of their swimming pools is already at work serving the community's children and visitors. "We're having fun, we're happy to be here," Reshit says. "We are waiting for a permanent nucleus of families to move in.

We're just a temporary nucleus." Shmuel, who came from Hebron, says that they entered the property without confrontations and that the military is protecting the families. and that they even offered help and brought them water. Binyamin Governor and Yesha Council chairman Yisrael Ganz said, "The return to Jericho connects our roots with the future we are building here." According to Ganz, approximately a year ago, antiquities looters broke into an ancient burial site near the Hasmonean palaces, where a shattered skull was discovered.

Ganz said the incident illustrates the danger of abandoning Jewish heritage sites and accused the Palestinian Authority of attempting to erase historical and archaeological evidence of the Jewish connection to the area. "Today, alongside the place where our ancestors lived more than 2,000 years ago, Jewish families are establishing their homes," Ganz said. "Our responsibility is to establish a community here and work to preserve and restore the site, so that the children who grow up here will know their history through the place where they live.

We have come home, and we are here to stay." Young Neta Gazit also has a wish for the new neighborhood. "I hope more and more houses will be purchased and that the entire Land of Israel will belong to the Jews."

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

Arutz Sheva tells a settler takeover of eight homes on the edge of Jericho as a "Jewish return" to a "neighborhood" in "the Land of Israel". It never tells its reader that this is the occupied West Bank or that the ICJ has found settlements there illegal. It states the disputed purchase as fact and gives the settlers and their movement every voice, while the Palestinians of Jericho appear only through a settler's account.

  1. Hedges the documented record

    Severe

    “Inside the Jewish return to Jericho”

    Why this matters
    The headline calls settlers moving into homes on the outskirts of Jericho a "return". No word in the article says where this happens under law.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes Jewish families have come home to a place inside their own country, and that nothing about the move is unlawful.
    The context
    Other coverage places these homes in the West Bank and calls the families Israeli settlers. The ICJ has found the occupation of the West Bank unlawful and the settlements illegal (R1, R2). The article never uses the words occupied, occupation or illegal, although the whole story turns on Israelis settling there.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli settlers from the Nachala movement have moved into eight homes on the outskirts of Jericho in the occupied West Bank, where the ICJ has found Israel's settlements illegal.

  2. Uses the occupation's words

    Serious

    “restore Jewish presence in various locations in the Land of Israel”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the outlet calls Hebron, Gaza and Jericho "the Land of Israel" and calls settling there restoring a presence.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes these places are part of Israel and that settlers moving into them are restoring something that belongs to them.
    The context
    Hebron and Jericho are in the occupied West Bank, and Gaza is under Israeli assault. The ICJ has found the occupation unlawful and the settlements illegal (R1, R2). Other coverage names these families as settlers.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “in a neighborhood named for the fruit most closely associated with the city”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls the group of homes the settlers took over a "neighborhood".
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes this is an ordinary residential district of a town, not a new settler foothold beside a Palestinian city.
    The context
    Other coverage of the same event calls it "a new outpost near Jericho" and describes a settlement organisation taking up residence. A settlement or outpost in occupied territory is illegal (R2).

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “two of the neighborhood's founders”

    Why this matters
    The outlet repeats the label and calls the settlers who moved in "founders".
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the Gazits founded a lawful community, and does not learn that they are settlers taking up homes in occupied territory.
    The context
    The coverage calls them settlers associated with Nachala, and the outpost is illegal under the ICJ's finding (R2).

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Settler families from the Nachala movement, who have taken part in settling Hebron and other places in the occupied West Bank, moved into a new outpost of eight homes on the outskirts of Jericho.

  3. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “purchased in secret”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the outlet states that the houses were bought, taking the Nachala movement's account as settled fact.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the settlers lawfully own the homes and that nobody questions the purchase.
    The context
    The Jerusalem Post reported two days earlier that Israeli military commanders were still examining the settlers' claims about the purchase, and that the purchase process remained unclear.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  4. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “He reveals that the Arab neighbors welcomed the newcomers”

    Why this matters
    The only account of how Jericho's residents received the settlers comes from a settler, and the outlet introduces it with "reveals", as if it were a disclosed fact.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the local population welcomed the move.
    The context
    No resident of Jericho and no Palestinian official is quoted anywhere in the article. Coverage of the same event reports that the Palestinian Authority treats such sales as a crime and suspended land transactions after the purchase.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

  1. 9 Nov3,039 dunams: Major development project advances in Gush Etzion8.7
  2. 9 Nov"Historic achievement": Another community officially recognized in northern Samaria9.1
  3. 8 NovIDF's 98th Division wraps up Judea and Samaria mission7.3
  4. 8 Nov14 foreign nationals suspected of provoking clashes for anti-Israel Content6.0
  5. 8 NovExcavator used by IDF confiscated in Gush Etzion6.0

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News