Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on West Bank, 9 November 2026

9.1out of 10Severe

"Historic achievement": in

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

First reported: The Interior Ministry granted an official locality code Monday to the community of Noa in northern Samaria, and . This is the 40th locality code issued recently as part of the policy promoted by Finance Minister and Minister in the Defense Ministry Bezalel Smotrich to establish new communities and regularize the status of young communities in Judea and Samaria.

The community of Noa, located within the jurisdiction of the Samaria Regional Council near the communities of Ganim and Kadim, was designated as a new community by a decision of the Security Cabinet in March 2026. Following that decision, and after preparatory work by the Civil Administration and the Settlement Administration in the Defense Ministry, IDF Central Command chief Maj. Gen. Avi Bluth signed an order establishing the community's jurisdictional boundaries.

Now, with the issuance of its official locality code, the community has completed the formal recognition stage. An official locality code represents a significant step in the regularization process, . These include an authorized position for a military security coordinator (Ravshatz), postal services, and a direct water connection through the Mekorot national water company.

Minister Smotrich welcomed the development, saying, "In less than a year, thank God, we have succeeded in obtaining 40 locality codes as part of the establishment of new communities and the regularization of young communities. This is a historic achievement and the fruit of the efforts of many dedicated partners who share our vision." He went on to address the political significance of the move. "Settlement in Judea and Samaria continues to expand and flourish at full strength.

And in the face of those who want to establish a government with supporters of terrorism, destroy the settlement enterprise, and establish a Palestinian state, ." Smotrich thanked the Interior Ministry, the head of IDF Central Command, the Civil Administration, and the Settlement Administration for advancing the regularization efforts.

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

Arutz Sheva reports the Israeli state's recognition of the settlement of Noa entirely in the language of the occupying power: northern Samaria, Judea and Samaria, a community being regularised. In its own voice it places the settlement inside the State of Israel and never tells the reader that the West Bank is occupied or that the ICJ has found the settlements illegal. It then gives Bezalel Smotrich the closing claim to an 'ancestral homeland' with nothing against it.

  1. Hedges the documented record

    Severe

    “officially recognizing it as a community in the State of Israel”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the outlet says Noa is now recognised "as a community in the State of Israel".
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes Noa lies within Israel and that its recognition settles its legal status.
    The context
    Noa is in the occupied West Bank, not in the State of Israel. The ICJ found the occupation unlawful and the settlements illegal under international law. The article, which turns entirely on the settlement's status, never mentions either finding.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “occupied”, “illegal”, “unlawful” and “international”.

    Show it in the article

    “enabling a community to be recognized by all government ministries and to receive services and infrastructure independently”

    Why this matters
    The outlet explains the locality code only as a route to ministry recognition, services and infrastructure.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes this is a neutral administrative upgrade for a town.
    The context
    The services described, including a direct Mekorot water connection and a military security coordinator, are the occupying state extending its own infrastructure to a settlement the ICJ found illegal. The article gives none of that status.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“a direct water connection through the Mekorot national water company”
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The code extends Israeli state services to Noa, a settlement in the occupied West Bank. The International Court of Justice found in July 2024 that Israel's occupation is unlawful and its settlements illegal under international law.

  2. Uses the occupation's words

    Serious

    “northern Samaria”

    Why this matters
    The headline places Noa in "northern Samaria", the Israeli state's name for the area, in the outlet's own voice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes Noa sits in an ordinary region with a neutral name, inside Israel.
    The context
    Noa is in the occupied West Bank. The ICJ found Israel's occupation of the West Bank unlawful in July 2024. The article never uses the words West Bank or occupied.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “West Bank” and “occupied”.

    Show it in the article

    “Another community officially recognized”

    Why this matters
    The headline calls Noa a "community", a word that hides what it is.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes a village or town has been given routine recognition.
    The context
    Noa is a settlement. Smotrich himself, quoted later in the article, calls it what it is: "Settlement in Judea and Samaria continues to expand and flourish". The ICJ found the settlements illegal.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Settlement in Judea and Samaria continues to expand and flourish”
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    “completing the process of regularizing its status”

    Why this matters
    The outlet describes the granting of a locality code as "regularizing its status", a paperwork word.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes Noa's legal standing has been put in order and the settlement is now lawful.
    The context
    An Israeli administrative code does not change the settlement's status under international law. The ICJ found Israel's settlements in the West Bank illegal.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

  3. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Serious

    “we are building, regularizing, and strengthening our hold on our ancestral homeland”

    Why this matters
    Smotrich's claim to be strengthening Israel's hold on an "ancestral homeland" closes the substance of the article. The only line after it is a list of thanks.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is left with the settlement presented as lawful building on land that belongs to Israel, with no other view.
    The context
    The ICJ found Israel's occupation of the West Bank unlawful and its settlements illegal. The article sets nothing against Smotrich's claim.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Smotrich said Israel was strengthening its hold on what he called its ancestral homeland. The International Court of Justice has found the occupation of the West Bank unlawful and the settlements illegal.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

  1. 9 Nov3,039 dunams: Major development project advances in Gush Etzion8.7
  2. 9 Nov'We were ready for any mission': Inside the Jewish return to Jericho8.7
  3. 8 NovIDF's 98th Division wraps up Judea and Samaria mission7.3
  4. 8 Nov14 foreign nationals suspected of provoking clashes for anti-Israel Content6.0
  5. 8 NovExcavator used by IDF confiscated in Gush Etzion6.0

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News