The Spectator opinion piece, on UK Politics, 23 October 2026

8.7out of 10Severe

The gross narcissism of teachers wearing Palestine badges

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

Leftie teachers are shocked that they might soon be prevented from wearing Palestine badges in the classroom. Spare a thought for the rest of us who are shocked that you were doing that in the first place. You taught kids, including Jewish kids, while just three years ago? What the hell is wrong with you? What a testament to the infantilisation of our institutions that teachers now demand the right to coat themselves in the accoutrements of the Current Thing The badge debate has been reignited by Sir David Bell’s review of soaring anti-Semitism in our schools.

Sir David doesn’t actually propose a ban on teachers draping themselves in the bourgeois must-have of Palestine paraphernalia. But he does say schools should ‘consider the appropriateness’ of such sartorial sanctimony. It is ‘entirely reasonable’, he says, for individual schools to outlaw Gaza chic. This was enough to get teachers blubbing on social media. They’re flattering themselves as the brave defenders of boutique liberty against our McCarthyite ruling class.

They’ve won the backing of moonbat MP Zarah Sultana who is outraged – outraged I tell you! – that teachers might soon be ‘threatened with disciplinary action’ just for wearing badges. God I feel old. I remember when you could be threatened with disciplinary action in school for having too much gel in your hair. I spent a whole day in school-issue plimsolls because my Doc Martens were considered inappropriate. Girls frequently had to surrender their hoop earrings to the school secretary.

And it went for teachers too, who were expected to look sharp and neat, not like geriatric edgelords festooned in the regalia of a foreign war. Most popular Ross Clark Who cares if Barclays lays off 5 per cent of its staff? Douglas Murray France is a warning – our civilisation is not immortal Lionel Shriver Can we be surprised that France has descended into nihilism? What a testament to the infantilisation of our institutions that teachers now demand the right to coat themselves in the accoutrements of the Current Thing.

You’re teaching chemistry, not saving the world. Grow up. It is so telling that these people are hell-bent on retaining their Palestine trinkets. They’re basically crying: ‘You will pry my keffiyeh from my cold, dead hands!’ You couldn’t ask for better proof that Gaza-wear has become the holy vestment of middle-class righteousness. I now audibly groan when I pass by a member of the keffiyeh classes. A regulation acrylic keffiyeh wrapped round their shoulders, enamel baubles of vanity on their lapels, very possibly a neatly folded Palestine flag in their Daunt Books tote bag in case of emergency protest – they are insufferable.

We get it! You are virtuous. You hate Israel. Thanks. Give it a rest now, please . That even our schools are falling to the keffiyeh cult is deeply troubling. It takes narcissism to dizzying new heights to turn the classroom from a place of instruction into an arena for competitive sanctimony. What industrial-grade vanity it must require to treat even schools as a stage for your moral preening.

Kids are there to learn, not to be a captive audience for your showy Israelophobia. Put it away. And, yes, the Palestine colours are particularly offensive to Jewish kids. Thanks to the left’s Cult of Palestine, their fawning over , it is easy to forget just what a benighted, backward ‘nation’ Palestine is.

Hamas is constitutionally committed to the mass murder of Jews, as evidenced by its Nazi-like atrocities on 7 October. Fatah isn’t much better: it gives generous pensions to the families of Jew-killers and its officials have spouted medieval-level anti-Semitism . Jewish kids have every right to feel unnerved and even intimidated by the sight of a teacher in a Palestine badge.

Have a heart. Or at least a brain. I presume a teacher wouldn’t wear the flag of the Iranian regime – though these days, who knows? – so why wear the flag of an equally regressive state-of-sorts that has fascist armies in it funded by Iran? It’s a no-brainer for me that teachers should not be allowed to wear Palestine badges. That’s not an attack on their free speech – it’s an attempt to restore the great, noble duty of a school, which is to teach, to enlighten, to ensure every child feels welcome.

The right of Jewish kids to learn without being reminded of a distant nation that hates them takes precedence over your own insatiable urge to advertise your moral rectitude – is that really so difficult to understand? All the talk of teachers being persecuted for their beliefs is nauseating given the Batley Grammar schoolteacher is still in hiding from Islamo-loons after he reportedly showed his pupils an ‘inappropriate’ image of Muhammd in a lesson about freedom of speech.

How about this: you can wear a Palestine badge to school if your fellow teachers can display an image of Muhammad with a bomb in his turban without being threatened with death – deal?

Read the original article on spectator.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

Brendan O’Neill’s column denies the documented record. It calls the genocide finding a dumb confusion of war and genocide and writes the occupation as merely supposed. It also brands Palestinians as a whole a backward people awash with Jew hatred, resting that charge on Hamas and Fatah, and ties teachers wearing Palestine badges to the 7 October massacre through the colours alone.

Opinion piece: read for false claims of fact and for fairness to the people it names, not for its opinions.

  1. Makes a false claim

    Severe

    “You’re so dumb you think war is genocide.”

    Why this matters
    O’Neill writes that anyone who calls what is happening in Gaza genocide is simply mistaking a war for genocide.
    The impression it gives
    The reader comes away believing that no genocide is taking place in Gaza and that the charge is an ignorant error.
    The context
    A UN Commission of Inquiry has found that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. Coverage of this same review describes it as Israel's genocide in Gaza. The column denies a documented finding.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “this sacred territory that is supposedly occupied by dastardly Jews”

    Why this matters
    The word "supposedly" turns the occupation into a doubtful claim. The phrase "dastardly Jews" puts Jews as a people in the place of the Israeli state.
    The impression it gives
    The reader is told the occupation of Palestinian land is a fiction of the left, and that those who oppose it are accusing Jews rather than a state.
    The context
    The ICJ's July 2024 advisory opinion holds Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful and the settlements illegal. The occupation is a legal finding against the State of Israel, not a supposition about Jews.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe ICJ's July 2024 advisory opinion holds Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful and the Israeli settlements illegal.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    A UN Commission of Inquiry has found that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, and the ICJ has held Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.

  2. Judges a whole people on a few

    Serious

    “It is awash, from Gaza to the West Bank, with the most rank Jew hatred.”

    Why this matters
    O’Neill says the whole of Palestine, Gaza and the West Bank alike, is awash with Jew hatred.
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes Palestinians in general are antisemites.
    The context
    The only support given is Hamas's charter and 7 October, and claims about Fatah pensions and officials. Two political and armed groups stand in for millions of people.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Hamas is constitutionally committed to the mass murder of Jews”
    • Elsewhere in the article“its officials have spouted medieval-level anti-Semitism”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Hamas carried out the 7 October attack and some Fatah officials have made antisemitic statements; that is a charge against those groups, not against Palestinians as a people.

  3. Guilt by association

    Minor

    “adorned in the colours under which more than a thousand Jews were massacred by Islamo-fascists”

    Why this matters
    O’Neill puts teachers wearing Palestine badges in the same colours as the 7 October killers.
    The impression it gives
    The reader is led to see a teacher's Palestine badge as a banner of the 7 October massacre.
    The context
    The badges at issue, including the watermelon symbol, are reported as signs of Palestinian solidarity. Nothing in the column ties any teacher to Hamas.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “Those colours are the last thing their co-religionists saw before being put to death by the anti-Semites of Hamas.”

    Why this matters
    The column repeats the tie and makes the Palestinian colours themselves the mark of Hamas's killers.
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes a Palestine badge in a classroom is a reminder of Hamas's killings, and that the teacher wearing it shares in them.
    The context
    The tie rests only on shared colours. The same coverage describes the badges as a sign of solidarity with Palestinians, not support for Hamas.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Spectator

  1. 24 OctWhy has the town of Dudley given up on itself?0.0
  2. 23 OctWhen police officers become desensitised to death0.0
  3. 23 OctWhy wasn’t Jonathan Powell vetted before starting his security role?0.0
  4. 23 OctWill Burnham’s war on small irritations pay off?0.0
  5. 22 OctHome Office spend thousands on ‘don’t rape women’ guide3.0

Everything we scored from The Spectator