Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on Iran, 23 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Trump signals more strikes on Iran: We may do it a little bit further

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

US President Donald Trump suggested Thursday that the United States could carry out additional military strikes against Iran, reiterating his determination to prevent the Islamic Republic from obtaining nuclear weapons. Speaking to reporters outside the White House before departing for a campaign rally in Iowa ahead of the November 3 midterm elections, Trump defended his administration's military campaign against Tehran and argued that previous presidents should have confronted the Iranian nuclear threat.

He said he is "doing what should have been done by other presidents. There's a price to pay, which I knew immediately when I did it." Trump acknowledged that his decision to launch the war had generated differing reactions but maintained that preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons remained essential. "But we can't let Iran have a nuclear weapon. I mean, in one way, people probably don't love it. But many people, many great patriots really love it."

The President then indicated that further military action remained a possibility. "This should have been done a long time ago by other presidents, the Iran war. And we've knocked the hell out of them. And we may do it a little bit further." Thursday's remarks followed Trump's statements at a campaign rally in South Carolina on Wednesday, where he expressed confidence that the conflict with Iran was nearing its conclusion. However, the President suggested that Washington wanted to ensure that the results of its military operations would be lasting before bringing the campaign to an end.

The war, he stated, will "end very soon. We could leave now, but we want to make sure it lasts for a long time. Now, if you look at that, it's amazing what we did. Our military is unbelievable." Trump's latest comments come amid continuing discussions within his administration over whether another round of military strikes would be necessary to achieve American objectives in Iran. On Wednesday, The New York Times reported that American and Israeli military officials had developed detailed plans for renewed attacks against Iran.

According to the report, a new military campaign could begin after the November 3 congressional midterm elections, although Trump has not authorized an operation. The preparations are reportedly part of the administration's broader deliberations over . Asked about the newspaper's findings, a White House official declined to confirm whether additional strikes were under consideration, saying the administration does not comment on military plans “that may or may not exist."

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Arutz Sheva reports Trump's remarks on possible further strikes on Iran and the New York Times report of US and Israeli plans for renewed attacks. It presents those plans only as part of an effort to stop Iran getting nuclear weapons. It leaves out that the reported plans include energy infrastructure and aim to force concessions by weakening Iran's economy. No Iranian voice appears, and the article closes on a White House official's framing.

  1. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    “how to conclude the war while ensuring that Tehran cannot develop nuclear weapons”

    Why this matters
    Arutz Sheva describes the reported US and Israeli strike plans only as a way to end the war while ensuring Tehran cannot develop nuclear weapons.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the renewed strikes being planned are aimed only at Iran's nuclear capacity.
    The context
    Other coverage of the same New York Times report says the targets include energy infrastructure and Iran's missile and drone arsenal. One official said the goal was to force diplomatic concessions by further weakening Iran's economy. The article never mentions energy targets or the economic aim.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “The official added that Trump continues to keep all options available as Washington seeks to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.”

    Why this matters
    Arutz Sheva closes on a White House official's statement after an article made up entirely of Trump's words and a US official's comment.
    The impression it gives
    A reader hears only Washington's account of the threatened strikes and their purpose.
    The context
    Iranian officials responded to the same reports, saying they are prepared for another attack and would hit back at US bases and Gulf energy facilities. The article gives Iran no voice at all.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

  1. 24 OctIran reportedly ready to target submarine cables if war resumes3.0
  2. 24 OctUS intelligence warns of advanced Iranian assassination plots6.0
  3. 23 OctUS Ambassador to Turkey: Could there be an Iran strike this weekend? Absolutely6.0
  4. 23 OctIranian lawmaker calls for nuclear response if US launches new attack3.0
  5. 23 OctReport: Trump eyes multi-day Iran offensive after midterms3.0

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News