Al-Monitor, on UK Politics, 4 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

UK ban on Palestine Action is challenged at top court, some protesters arrested

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

By Sam Tobin LONDON, Nov 4 (Reuters) - A co-founder of Palestine Action challenged Britain's decision to ban the campaign group as a terrorist organisation at the UK Supreme Court on Wednesday, arguing that the move was disproportionate and undermined counter-terrorism laws. The British government proscribed Palestine Action last year after a series of high-profile incidents mostly targeting defence firms, culminating in a break-in at the Royal Air Force's Brize Norton air base in which two planes were damaged.

Britain's Home Office (interior ministry) argues that the group's escalating actions, causing serious property damage, particularly a 2024 raid targeting Israeli defence firm Elbit Systems, amounted to terrorism and justified the ban. But the move has drawn criticism from civil liberties groups and prominent supporters including Irish novelist Sally Rooney, whose books can no longer be sold in Britain over her plans to provide royalties to the group.

There have been more than 3,600 arrests linked to support for Palestine Action between proscription in July 2025 and this June, representing more than one-third of all terrorism arrests in Britain since 9/11, according to Home Office statistics. With the arrest of over 300 people last weekend outside the US embassy in London, plus two dozen or so outside the Supreme Court on Wednesday, the figure is now more than 4,000 – though any resulting charges could be dropped if the ban is overturned.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says what the more than 4,000 people were arrested for. Other outlets reported that the weekend arrests were for holding placards reading "I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action", and that those detained included pensioners, a priest, a military veteran and Holocaust survivors. Without this, a reader who sees the arrests counted as a third of all terrorism arrests since 9/11 may picture people suspected of violent acts.

How we know

LAWYER COMPARES GROUP TO SUFFRAGETTES Founded in 2020, Palestine Action carried out hundreds of "actions", many involving obstructing or occupying premises, or spraying graffiti and breaking windows of businesses they said were linked to providing arms to Israel. , Palestine Action's campaign escalated, the Home Office says, with the Elbit raid causing an estimated £1 million ($1.35 million) of damage.

Lawyers representing Huda Ammori, who co-founded Palestine Action, said that, at the time the group was proscribed, government officials had assessed that just three of 385 actions carried out over five years had met the definition of terrorism. London's High Court initially ruled that the ban was unlawful, but the Court of Appeal overturned that decision in June, rejecting comparisons with historical groups such as the suffragettes who campaigned for women's right to vote.

Ammori's lawyer Raza Husain, however, said on Wednesday that the suffragettes and other groups "used tactics similar or more extreme than Palestine Action", citing the suffragettes' early 20th-century bombing campaign. The Home Office, though, says the 2024 Elbit attack did involve the use of violence and weapons against security staff and police officers, one of whom suffered a spinal injury when she was hit with a sledgehammer. The United States in August also designated Palestine Action as a terrorist group.

President Donald Trump has described activists who targeted his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland last year as "terrorists". ($1 = 0.7433 pounds) (Reporting by Sam TobinEditing by Gareth Jones)

Read the original article on al-monitor.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

This Reuters report on the Supreme Court challenge to the Palestine Action ban sets the Home Office case against the co-founder's, attributes the government's claims, and reports officials' own finding that only three of 385 actions met the terrorism definition. Its weaknesses are minor. It describes Israel's assault on Gaza only as bombing "in response" to the Hamas attack and never mentions the genocide finding. It also never says that most arrests were for holding a placard reading "I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action".

  1. Uses one side's framing for Gaza

    Minor

    “After Israel began bombarding Gaza in response to a deadly attack by Hamas-led fighters in October 2023”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the article calls the Hamas attack "deadly" but describes Israel's assault on Gaza only as "bombarding" carried out "in response".
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away seeing Israel's assault on Gaza as a reaction to an attack, with no sense of its scale or of what international bodies have found.
    The context
    A UN Commission of Inquiry has found that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. The word genocide appears nowhere in the article, although it is in the slogan the protesters were arrested for. This is background to a story about a court case, so the gap is minor.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says what the more than 4,000 people were arrested for. Other outlets reported that the weekend arrests were for holding placards reading "I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action", and that those detained included pensioners, a priest, a military veteran and Holocaust survivors. Without this, a reader who sees the arrests counted as a third of all terrorism arrests since 9/11 may picture people suspected of violent acts.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “government officials had assessed that just three of 385 actions carried out over five years had met the definition of terrorism”

    It reports the government's own assessment, which cuts against the case for the ban, with exact figures.

  • “Britain's Home Office (interior ministry) argues that the group's escalating actions”

    It attributes the terrorism characterisation to the Home Office rather than stating it in the outlet's voice.

  • “though any resulting charges could be dropped if the ban is overturned”

    It tells the reader what is at stake for the thousands arrested, not only the arrest totals.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Al-Monitor

  1. 4 NovUK court weighs ban on pro-Palestinian group amid protests3.0
  2. 4 NovFight over pro-Palestinian group ban heads to UK's highest court0.0
  3. 31 OctUK police arrest Palestine Action supporters ahead of Supreme Court hearing3.0
  4. 30 OctBritain bars entry to Swedish academic ahead of appearance with Palestine Action founder0.0
  5. 27 OctTwo men charged in UK with helping Iran over RAF Fairford incident7.3

Everything we scored from Al-Monitor