Daily Mirror, on UK Politics, 1 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Rachel Reeves backs rejoining EU and blasts Brexit for making UK 'poorer, weaker and less secure'

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Rachel Reeves has blamed Brexit for making the UK "poorer, weaker and less secure" - and said our future must be in the EU. The former Chancellor backed Andy Burnham's push for a rethink on the relationship with the bloc, . The Prime Minister has said he wants an "open conversation" on the EU, and has left the door open to fighting the next election on a promise to take Britain back into the bloc. In her first major intervention since she was sacked in July, Ms Reeves wrote in the Sunday Times: “I am proud of the progress we have already made in strengthening our relationship with the European Union.

“Brexit has made us poorer, weaker and less secure. There is a debate to be had about our future relationship with Europe, and I welcome Andy Burnham’s leadership in facing up to this. No one in the Treasury ever doubted where my instincts were.” She added: "I do believe Britain’s future lies in the European Union. However, it is incumbent on supporters of our re-entry to make the argument, demonstrate tangible benefits and to get the next steps right — especially ahead of the UK-EU summit later this month, where at a minimum we should be looking for confirmation of the ambitious youth mobility scheme negotiated earlier this year, and — I hope — progress towards entry into the SAFE defence partnership."

Her comments came after ex PM Keir Starmer said the UK and Europe must work closer together as the US becomes a less reliable ally. Speaking in Ireland on Friday, Mr Starmer warned “things will not go back to the way they were” and said the US would no longer “bankroll” its allies. He argued Europe needed a “common security framework as much as a common market”, with the UK at its centre. Mr Burnham wants to lock in deals on food and drink, emissions trading and a youth mobility scheme at a long-awaited UK-EU summit in Brussels this month.

But he has is also planning to “explore options” for the long-term relationship after the summit. The PM has committed to abiding by Labour's Brexit "red lines", a commitment in the 2024 manifesto that there would be no return to freedom of movement, the customs union or the single market. But he has signalled that a much closer relationship could be on the table at the next election. Mr Burnham fuelled speculation he supported a return to freedom of movement last weekend, until No10 stepped in to clarify he is not proposing any particular option.

“He is saying that it’s time for us to discuss what kind of long-term relationship with Europe is best for Britain and he is referring to the types of areas that that agreement and long-term future could cover,” the PM's deputy spokeswoman said. “He is crucially not leaning either way, and that will be for the British public to decide. Mr Burnham has warned ministers not to "advocate for specific options or opine on the likely outcome of the process”.

In a letter to his Cabinet, Mr Burnham said any “fundamental change” to post-Brexit arrangements would be “for the public to decide” and left to the next Parliament.

Read the original article on mirror.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Mirror reports Rachel Reeves's Sunday Times article saying Brexit made the UK poorer, weaker and less secure and that Britain's future lies in the EU. It attributes her words clearly and gives the Prime Minister's caveats. Its one lapse is a loaded word, "omerta", in its own voice.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “which has ended Labour's Brexit omerta”

    Why this matters
    The Mirror calls Labour's earlier stance on Brexit an "omerta", the Mafia's code of silence, in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes Labour's past position as an enforced code of silence that has now been broken.
    The context
    The article's own facts describe a manifesto commitment on red lines and a Prime Minister who still tells ministers not to advocate specific options. That is a stated policy and a cabinet instruction, not a Mafia code. The word carries a verdict the reporting does not.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“a commitment in the 2024 manifesto”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Mr Burnham has warned ministers not to "advocate for specific options”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “In her first major intervention since she was sacked in July, Ms Reeves wrote in the Sunday Times”

    It names the source of the remarks and gives her position plainly, so the reader knows the claims about Brexit are hers.

  • “any “fundamental change” to post-Brexit arrangements would be “for the public to decide” and left to the next Parliament”

    It gives the Prime Minister's own limit on the process, so the reader does not take Reeves's view as government policy.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Mirror

  1. 1 NovJohn Healey rejects slavery reparations calls as row threatens King's Commonwealth tour3.0
  2. 31 OctBBC £180 TV Licence rules to get refund - full list of those entitled0.0
  3. 31 Oct'Doing nothing on welfare costs lives and will see another generation failed'0.0
  4. 31 OctAlan Milburn warns failing to act on Neets crisis will 'cost lives'3.0
  5. 31 OctDWP update on 'accuracy' rules over new audio recordings at health assessments0.0

Everything we scored from Daily Mirror