Daily Mirror, on UK Politics, 1 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

John Healey rejects slavery reparations calls as

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Brits should not have to fund reparations for the slave trade “in which they had no role”, the Chancellor has said. John Healey said discussions of an apology from the UK for its role in the transatlantic trade in enslaved people did not mean taxpayers should be left on the hook centuries later. It comes after Andy Burnham opened the door to a formal apology for slavery as he prepares to travel to the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in Antigua this week.

The row over reparations has already dominated King Charles 's tour of the Caribbean ahead of the summit. Mr Healey told the BBC 's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme: “The Prime Minister has said, look, we are open to a discussion about an apology. He feels that that’s the right thing, particularly ahead of the Commonwealth leaders’ conference. "But he doesn’t believe that reparations are the right approach, and considering a formal apology doesn’t mean accepting that British people now should accept the financial liability for any part in things that happened hundreds of years ago, in which they had no role.”

The Prime Minister broke with the Government's longstanding position this weekend to say he is open to discussions on the UK formally apologising for its role in the transatlantic slave trade. He described the sale of enslaved Africans to the Americas, as a "brutal and barbaric violation" and said Britain must "face up to the past". Going further than his predecessors, Mr Burnham said: “Having these difficult conversations to safeguard the Commonwealth for the future is the right thing to do.

It is also the patriotic thing to do. “Not just because it is in our interests, but because the Britain I believe in is confident, decent and brave. We led the world in abolishing slavery – and we can show leadership again today. "So we are offering a structured dialogue with those affected by the transatlantic slave trade. Listening to calls for a formal apology on behalf of the British state will form an important part of this process, and I am open to them."

But he rejected the idea of paying reparations, saying it was not right for British people to be liable for "historical wrongs, however heinous, that happened in a different age under different laws and in which they played no personal part". Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey backed the PM's stance, telling TimesRadio: "I don't think we should pay reparations at all, but I do have some sympathy with the idea that an apology makes sense. I'd like to see what the Government's going to say about that, but it's good that they're considering it."

But he criticised the Government for slashing the foreign aid budget, which he said had caused misery and poverty in many countries affected by the slave trade. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch dismissed the idea of an apology, and said she was concerned CHOGM will be . Mrs Badenoch told Sky News: “We need to start looking at how we can bring the Commonwealth together – start looking forwards, not backwards.

I don’t think we should be giving any money to compensate people for the slave trade, and I don’t think that Andy Burnham needs to be apologising because it is a lever to wedge open the door to ask for cash." The King will speak about the issue of slavery with “unflinching honesty” and “sincere sorrow” in a speech to open the meeting on Tuesday - but is not expected to offer an apology.

Read the original article on mirror.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Mirror reports the Chancellor, the Prime Minister, Ed Davey and Kemi Badenoch on a slavery apology and reparations, and attributes each position clearly to the person who holds it. Its headline says the row threatens the King's tour when the body says only that it has dominated it. The people calling for reparations, whom the headline says Healey rejects, never speak and appear only through Badenoch's description of them as asking Britain for money.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “row threatens King's Commonwealth tour”

    Why this matters
    The word "threatens" in the headline tells the reader the reparations row puts the King's tour at risk.
    The impression it gives
    The King's Commonwealth tour is in jeopardy because of the reparations row.
    The context
    The body says only that the row has "already dominated" the tour, and that the King will still open the summit with a speech on slavery. Other coverage reports the tour going ahead on its final leg with no sign of a threat to it.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. One side gets the space

    Minor

    ““yet another opportunity for people to start asking Britain for money””

    Why this matters
    The only description in the article of those who call for reparations is Kemi Badenoch's line that they want to ask Britain for money.
    The impression it gives
    Reparations calls come from unnamed people who simply want cash, with no case of their own.
    The context
    The headline is about Healey rejecting "reparations calls", yet no one making those calls is named or quoted. Reuters reports that the Prime Minister is likely to face demands for reparations at the summit, so those making the demands are part of this story. Every voice in the article is a British politician.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “He described the sale of enslaved Africans to the Americas, as a "brutal and barbaric violation"”

    It reports plainly what the trade was and quotes the Prime Minister's own words for it, rather than softening it to "history" or "the past".

  • “but is not expected to offer an apology”

    It sets the King's promised "unflinching honesty" against the fact that no apology is expected. This matches the Palace briefing reported elsewhere and does not overstate what the King will say.

  • “The Prime Minister broke with the Government's longstanding position this weekend”

    It tells the reader plainly that the apology offer is a change in government policy, which gives the reader the context for the row.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Mirror

  1. 1 NovRachel Reeves backs rejoining EU and blasts Brexit for making UK 'poorer, weaker and less secure'3.0
  2. 31 OctBBC £180 TV Licence rules to get refund - full list of those entitled0.0
  3. 31 Oct'Doing nothing on welfare costs lives and will see another generation failed'0.0
  4. 31 OctAlan Milburn warns failing to act on Neets crisis will 'cost lives'3.0
  5. 31 OctDWP update on 'accuracy' rules over new audio recordings at health assessments0.0

Everything we scored from Daily Mirror